Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05QUITO263
2005-02-02 16:06:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Quito
Cable title:  

BANANA EXPORTERS CONTEST PROPOSED EU TARIFF

Tags:  ECON ETRD EAGR PGOV KDEM EC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 000263 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: PREL,
TAGS: ECON ETRD EAGR PGOV KDEM EC
SUBJECT: BANANA EXPORTERS CONTEST PROPOSED EU TARIFF


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 000263

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: PREL,
TAGS: ECON ETRD EAGR PGOV KDEM EC
SUBJECT: BANANA EXPORTERS CONTEST PROPOSED EU TARIFF



1. Summary. On January 26, Quito hosted a meeting of
representatives from seven Latin American banana-
exporting countries who oppose a recent European Union
decision to impose a 230 Euro (US$ 300) per metric ton
tariff on banana imports beginning in January 2006.
The presidents of Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panama,
Colombia, and Ecuador attended the summit, as did the
Honduran foreign minister and a delegation from
Nicaragua. The final declaration included a call for a
follow-on technical meeting February 14-15 in Colombia,
at which officials will consider next steps. EU
officials said they intend to "carefully study" the
summit's results but go forward nonetheless with plans
to impose the tariff in 2006; the EU formally notified
its new levy to the WTO on January 31. Local leaders
believe the EU decision threatens Latin American
interests considerably. End summary.

Banana Summit
--------------


2. The EU has proposed charging 230 Euro per ton for bananas
imported from Latin America, to go into effect in January

2006. Besides generating revenues, the tariff is intended to
protect fruit production in EU members' former colonies in
Africa, the Caribbean and Southeast Asia. Former Spanish
colonies in Latin America are not provided such protection.
Latin American producing nations claim that a tariff greater
than 75 Euro, the current within quota rate, is unfair.


3. Ecuadorian FM Patricio Zuquilanda, allegedly speaking for
the Latin Americans January 18, called for the complete
elimination of the banana tax. Subsequently, ministers of
trade, agriculture, and foreign affairs from the seven Latin
producers gathered in Panama City January 25, a day before the
Quito summit, to craft a joint declaration in opposition to
the levy. The ministers claim that the high tariff proposed
by the EU violates the EU's World Trade Organization (WTO)
obligations. Their draft declaration called on the EU to
respect its Doha Round commitments on market access for
tropics-grown agricultural products.


5. Presidents and country representatives signed the document
in Quito January 26. The statement formalizes their intention
to conduct joint banana export negotiations with the EU,
though there is no agreement on a specific negotiating
position. Leaders committed to evaluating the progress of
their discussions before the end of March. At a February 14-
15 technical meeting in Colombia, Latin producers plan to
analyze various counter-proposals to the EU measure.
According to an aide to Ecuadorian Trade Minister Baki, when
the EU officially notified the 230 Euro tariff on January 31
it effectively started the 60-day clock for WTO arbitration,
making the extension of the current quota system much less
likely. Prospects were also not good for resolving the
dispute outside of arbitration, in his opinion.


6. Delegations in Quito also agreed to convey the Quito
Declaration points to EU authorities via their missions in
Brussels. In comments to the press January 26, Ecuadorian
Minister of Agriculture Leonardo Escobar "leaked" another next
step: issuing a joint presidential statement seeking a
reduced EU tariff that guaranteed Latin American access to the
European banana market.


7. European Union representatives were present in Quito as
observers. They later told media they would closely study the
declaration and future Latin American requests, but asserted
the EU remained committed to implementing the tariff regime in

2006.

U.S. Banana Company Comments
--------------


8. Ecuadorian representatives from Del Monte, Chiquita and
Dole told Embassy officials that they favored a tariff of 75
Euros. If the tariff were set much higher, Chiquita would
prefer to keep the current quota system. (Chiquita has
licenses it would like to retain to protect its European
market.) Del Monte, on the other hand, described the quota
and license system as a "disaster." Dole, while opposed to
the 230 Euro tariff was willing to consider a tariff higher
than 75 Euros.

COMMENT
--------------


9. The EU tariff decision will impact banana exporters of
the region, many of which are U.S.-based companies. Press
accounts estimate adverse economic impact to the seven Latin
American countries as some $4.4 billion per year. There are
social costs as well, mainly associated with increased
unemployment the European tax could bring. For example,
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, in remarks in Quito, claimed
that "ten thousand Colombians (former illegal combatants) have
been demobilized and need to find jobs, but where are they
going to find them if this crisis is not solved?"

KENNEY