Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05QUITO2440
2005-10-26 19:29:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Quito
Cable title:  

CONGRESS OFFERS, AND PALACIO RESISTS, ASSEMBLY

Tags:  PGOV PINS EC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 002440 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

PASS TO WHA OAS

E.O. 12958: DECL: TEN YEARS
TAGS: PGOV PINS EC
SUBJECT: CONGRESS OFFERS, AND PALACIO RESISTS, ASSEMBLY
COMPROMISE

REF: QUITO 2409

Classified By: PolChief Erik Hall for reason 1.4 (b&d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 002440

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

PASS TO WHA OAS

E.O. 12958: DECL: TEN YEARS
TAGS: PGOV PINS EC
SUBJECT: CONGRESS OFFERS, AND PALACIO RESISTS, ASSEMBLY
COMPROMISE

REF: QUITO 2409

Classified By: PolChief Erik Hall for reason 1.4 (b&d).


1. (C) Summary: President of Congress Wilfredo Lucero met
with President Alfredo Palacio October 24 to relay lawmakers'
support for a constitutional assembly, but not a more
powerful constituent assembly as favored by Palacio. The
constituent assembly -- intended for times of complete
governmental breakdown -- could not only rewrite the
constitution, but dismiss the Congress. Palacio has publicly
resisted the compromise, insisting instead on his preferred
assembly over Congressional and electoral court opposition.
This may be a tactic to gain leverage over Congress, or could
signal more dangerous intentions which could affect stability
and U.S. interests. End Summary.

Constituent Assembly: All or nothing?
--------------


2. (U) As proposed by Lucero, with the backing of more than
2/3 of Congress including the PSC, ID, PRE, PRIAN and DP
parties, A constitutional assembly approved by referendum
would be limited to drafting amendments to agreed upon parts
of the constitution. Congress proposes that the assembly's
members be selected by universal vote. Palacio's earlier
plan, which he submitted directly to the Supreme Electoral
Tribunal (TSE) in an effort to bypass Congress, called for
the body to be 50 percent members of civil society and 50
percent party representatives. The TSE ruled that Palacio's
proposal required the approval of Congress (RefTel).


3. (U) Since the TSE rejected Palacio's proposed
referendum, Palacio has appealed for public support and
courted civil society groups, running TV spots promoting the
assembly idea. On October 25 Palacio told a group of 25
civil society groups that he continued to support a
constituent, and not a constitutional, assembly. Civil
society groups organized pro-assembly rallies in Quito and
Guayaquil on October 21, attracting several thousand, and are
expected to take to the streets again shortly. Most are
calling for the constituent assembly and the immediate
resignation of congress members. Some have threatened to
remove parliamentarians by force.

Political Class United Against Palacio
--------------


4. (C) PSC Congressmen (and brothers) Luis Fernando and
Carlos Torres told PolOffs October 26 that Palacio risked his
presidency by continuing to challenge Congress over the
dueling assembly models. They alleged that Palacio intends
to bypass Congress by issuing a decree authorizing a
constituent assembly. His ultimate goal is to postpone 2006
national elections and extend his mandate. Palacio is
influenced by outsiders, they alleged further, including
Central American political consultant Julio Ligorria, who has
been advising Palacio, and "elements loyal to Chavez,"
including former minister of social welfare Patricio Acosta.


5. (C) According to the Torres brothers, Palacio's assembly
proposal is a Chavez-like constitutional reform, which must
be stopped. Opposition discussions with the military
leadership have already begun, they alleged, and an
impeachment attempt was also under discussion between
political parties, should Palacio refuse to compromise.
Palacio's whole strategy, they believed, grew out of his need
to seize the political initiative to distract from the recent
return of ex-President Gutierrez.

Comment
--------------


6. (C) The Torres brothers are transparently trying to
manipulate us by alleging a Chavez influence over Palacio,
but we see real danger to USG interests should Palacio choose
to subvert what few constitutional checks still exist here by
attempting to put his constituent assembly proposal directly
to the people. In addition to risking his government's
stability, an unbounded assembly would put other democratic
institutions (e.g. Congress and the new Supreme Court,
assuming it exists) at risk and could be used to block an FTA
or disavow the Manta accords. Activating street protests to
push for an assembly is a very risky tactic, since once begun
Palacio will likely not be able to control this agitation.
Indigenous and leftist civil society groups could see the
assembly as an opportunity to advance their agendas, and may
be ready to take to the streets.


7. (C) Palacio still has another, more palatable,
opportunity to accept a more limited reform agenda by
negotiating with Congress over its counter-proposal. We will
encourage him to take it.
JEWELL