Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05PRAGUE514
2005-04-11 16:43:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Prague
Cable title:  

CZECH ENTER DEBATE ON EU CHINA ARMS EMBARGO

Tags:  PREL PHUM MASS CH EZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 PRAGUE 000514 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/11/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM MASS CH EZ
SUBJECT: CZECH ENTER DEBATE ON EU CHINA ARMS EMBARGO


Classified By: Political Officer Kimberly C. Krhounek, for reasons 1.4(
b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 PRAGUE 000514

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/11/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM MASS CH EZ
SUBJECT: CZECH ENTER DEBATE ON EU CHINA ARMS EMBARGO


Classified By: Political Officer Kimberly C. Krhounek, for reasons 1.4(
b) and (d).


1. (C) Summary. The Czech Republic is beginning to speak out
against the immediate removal of the EU China arms embargo.
Growing European debate over the timing and modalities of any
removal of the embargo is allowing the Czechs to play a more
active role in the debate and, the Czechs believe,
strengthening the hand of countries such as the Czech
Republic which are reluctant to lift the embargo now. MFA
officials report the Czechs will insist on improvements in
China's human rights record and a "strategic dialogue" with
other countries before a decision is made. They also state
that even if the embargo were lifted, the scale of Chinese
human rights abuses would prevent the Czech Republic from
exporting any weapons to China. On the other hand, MFA
officials, citing divisions within the government, remain
wary of standing alone against an EU consensus to lift the
embargo. The future Czech stance will depend in part on the
composition of the next Czech government. End summary.


2. (C) Jana Hybaskova, Czech MEP and a staunch supporter of
USG foreign policies, told Poloff April 4 that she was very
pleased with the two EP resolutions recently passed opposing
EU plans to lift the embargo, stating that it was a signal to
many EU governments that their publics do not support this
step. The EPP-ED party grouping in the EP has been at the
forefront of these efforts, but it has its own internal
divisions. Hybaskova said that the large German CDU party
remains in favor of the lift, and her fellow Czech MEPs from
the ODS party refuse to play an active role in the debate,
although MEP Jan Zahradil claims that they are in favor of
maintaining the current embargo. The attitude of the ODS
MEPs reflects the broader, more cautious Czech approach to
this issue within the EU, where we are repeatedly assured
that they are in agreement with US policy, but are unwilling
to take a strong stance in opposition to other members.


3. (C) In an April 6 meeting with Acting Assistant Secretary
of Defense Mira Ricardel, Czech Deputy Foreign Minister for

Security Policy Jan Winkler said that whatever decision the
EU makes about the China arms embargo, "we have no intention
of supplying China with arms." Winkler added that he had been
in Japan recently where he encouraged his hosts to speak out
in Brussels. Winkler argued that the issue is "too often
seen in the EU as one of concern only to the Americans."


4. (C) Czech MFA Political Director Martin Povejsil, in an
April 8 meeting with DCM, said that the consensus is that the
embargo will not be lifted during the Luxembourg presidency.
He said this new breathing space has permitted the Czech
Republic and others with concerns about the embargo to become
more active. He laid out the markers that the CR would like
to see before any decision is taken; namely improvement in
the Chinese human rights record and a "strategic dialogue"
with other interested countries, to include discussion about
the actual mechanisms that would regulate EU exports absent
the embargo. According to Povejsil, the Czechs believe this
dialogue should take place within existing EU mechanisms
(Solana's office and the EU Presidency) rather than through
some special purpose multilateral forum, and should be
conducted at a minimum with the U.S., Japan, Australia and
South Korea; within the USG context, the Czechs would like to
see it encompass both Congress and the Administration.
Povejsil claimed that several other EU countries were
prepared to join the GOCR in holding the EU to these
criteria, but did not identify them. Having other countries
shore up the Czech position will be determinative and allow
the Czech Republic to be more pro-active on this issue in EU
fora. He described the Czech government to date as being
divided on the question of the arms embargo, meaning there
was no chance that the CR would have had the authority to
take a view contrary to EU consensus (as they did, for
instance, earlier this year on EU Cuba policy). Finally,
Povejsil stated that, absent significant improvements in
China's human rights record, the CR would not permit any
weapons exports regardless of the status of the embargo.


5. (C) In a still unpublished editorial on the arms embargo,
written as his name rose to the top of the list of candidates
to replace current Prime Minister Stanislav Gross, Czech EU
Ambassador Jan Kohout states that the Czechs will insist on
the release of political prisoners from Tiananmen Square and
Chinese ratification of the convention on civil and political
rights as prerequisites for the embargo to be lifted. He
also argues that allies must be consulted.


6. (C) Comment. The message we are hearing from the Czechs
is consistent: while there are divisions within the
government on the question, the GOCR does not support lifting
the embargo; but nor do they have the will or, they believe,
the ability to stop it; that said, they will take full
advantage of the lull in movement towards lifting the embargo
to argue for steps that promote their traditional emphasis on
human rights and preserving transatlantic ties. The latter
sentiments are clearly most powerful at the MFA. The ongoing
efforts to create a new cabinet will have an impact: the
choice of a career diplomat like Jan Kohout as Prime Minister
will reinforce these trends; however if a hardliner like Jan
Kavan (who studied in Beijing in the 1970s) took over the
Foreign Ministry, the Czech position could shift. For now,
we expect the Czechs will try to speak out ever more loudly
in favor of a process that leads to lifting of the embargo
only when the conditions are right. End Comment.
HILLAS