Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05PARIS3245
2005-05-12 14:37:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Paris
Cable title:  

USUNESCO: 171st EXECUTIVE BOARD ITEM 65:

Tags:  AORC KIPR UNESCO WIPO WSIS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

121437Z May 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 003245 

SIPDIS

FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS
FOR IO/T - ROBERTS AND COWLEY, EB - PAUL ACETO
PLEASE PASS TO USPTO - M KLEPINGER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC KIPR UNESCO WIPO WSIS
SUBJECT: USUNESCO: 171st EXECUTIVE BOARD ITEM 65:
PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF BROADCAST ORGANIZATIONS -
PROPOSED BY INDIA


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 003245

SIPDIS

FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS
FOR IO/T - ROBERTS AND COWLEY, EB - PAUL ACETO
PLEASE PASS TO USPTO - M KLEPINGER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC KIPR UNESCO WIPO WSIS
SUBJECT: USUNESCO: 171st EXECUTIVE BOARD ITEM 65:
PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF BROADCAST ORGANIZATIONS -
PROPOSED BY INDIA



1. Summary. India's proposal to place a new UNESCO
convention on broadcasting on the agenda of the next General
Conference (GC) in October 2005 was derailed during the
recent Executive Board meeting. The U.S. Mission
successfully intervened to have the feasibility of such a
convention considered first at a scheduled meeting of the
Intergovernmental Council of the Rome Convention at UNESCO
headquarters on June 27-28, 2005. This step makes it
difficult to have the convention considered at the upcoming
GC.


2. India's proposal was an attempt to derail work on a
related treaty, supported by the US and currently underway
at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). A
U.S. observer delegation, expected to include
representatives from the U.S. Mission to UNESCO, USPTO and
the Library of Congress, will work with 12 UNESCO Member
States represented on the Intergovernmental Council to
obtain a recommendation from the Council that development of
a broadcasting convention by UNESCO is not appropriate. End
Summary


3. During UNESCO's 171st Executive Board, the Indian
delegation offered a draft resolution proposing that UNESCO
begin work on a convention "on broadcasting and emerging
technologies to protect and enhance access and sharing of
knowledge and information." The proposal sought to place
this item on the agenda of UNESCO's next General Conference
in October.


4. The draft proposal refers to a World Intellectual
Property Organization (WIPO) treaty already in progress that
will update the Rome Convention for the Protection of
Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting
Organizations (Rome Convention, 1961). While the U.S.
supports the WIPO process and has submitted its own proposed
text, India, with the support of Brazil, has unsuccessfully
attempted to block any progress on the WIPO treaty. The
proposal to have UNESCO take up a broadcasting convention
could be viewed as another attempt by India to derail the
proposed WIPO treaty on broadcasting by shifting
negotiations to a new forum. This attempt runs counter to
recent USG efforts to limit the number of new conventions at
UNESCO.


5. During discussion at UNESCO's last Executive Board,
USDEL initially sought an opportunity to have the proposal
withdrawn. When that proved not possible, USDEL managed to
get the convention proposal modified so that it would not
come before the Executive Board for consideration. The
final decision asked that the proposal be referred for
consideration at a scheduled meeting of the
Intergovernmental Council of the Rome Convention at UNESCO
headquarters on June 27-28, 2005. (Note: India tried
unsuccessfully to change the final language. The Indian
delegation, however, continues to maintain that a decision
was made to go forward at UNESCO with a convention on
broadcasting. In separate conversations, the Australian,
Canadian and French delegations strongly agreed with our
position that this was definitely not the case.)


6. Countries supporting the U.S. position were Russia,
Australia, Indonesia, Iceland, Ecuador, Canada and France.
India was supported by Venezuela, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.
Brazil did not intervene in support of India though Brazil
had supported India's efforts at WIPO.


7. Member states of UNESCO's Intergovernmental Council of
the Rome Convention are:

Belgium
Burkina Faso
Colombia
Denmark
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Latvia
Mexico
Poland
United Kingdom


8. Comment: Along with the cultural diversity convention,
this could be viewed as one more attempt by countries to
venue shop for their pet project. USDel worked hard during
the last Executive Board to stop new proposals like this and
to make it more costly for states to push their projects by
insisting that signatories pay for new conventions and the
meetings to draft conventions be paid out of UNESCO's core
budget. We are pleased that plans are evolving for an U.S.
Observer Delegation to take part in the upcoming
Intergovernmental Meeting at UNESCO. We see possible
additional actions to accomplish our objective as follows:
--engagement with the 12 UNESCO Member States on the
Intergovernmental Council to the Rome Convention to build
support for a decision that will keep the proposal by India
from going forward to the Executive Board;
--demarches to the 12 Council members and other like-minded
states before the meeting to seek support for our position;
and
--stopping/delaying development of a preliminary study of
the legal and technical aspects of the problem for
consideration by the UNESCO Executive Board. End Comment.

OLIVER