Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05PARIS3156
2005-05-10 16:39:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Paris
Cable title:  

USUNESCO: FRANCE PULLS OUT THE STOPS ON

Tags:  SCUL ETRD UNESCO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 003156 

SIPDIS


FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/09/2015
TAGS: SCUL ETRD UNESCO
SUBJECT: USUNESCO: FRANCE PULLS OUT THE STOPS ON
CULTURAL DIVERSITY

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 003156

SIPDIS


FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/09/2015
TAGS: SCUL ETRD UNESCO
SUBJECT: USUNESCO: FRANCE PULLS OUT THE STOPS ON
CULTURAL DIVERSITY


1. (C) Classified by Andrew C. Koss, Deputy Chief of
Mission, U.S. Mission to UNESCO in Paris, REASON-1.4D.


2. (C) Summary: France has made it clear that
passage of a cultural diversity convention at this
fall's UNESCO General Conference is a top foreign
policy priority. The push for increased EU
participation at the just completed Executive Board is
but one part of a broader strategy to get the
convention passed no matter what it takes. With the
last round of negotiations in February unable to reach
agreement on key topics, such as the convention's
relationship to other (namely trade) agreements, much
hangs on the results of the next round scheduled May 25
to June 4 in Paris. The French badly need for that
round to succeed if the convention is to be adopted by
the next General Conference in October. End Summary.



3. (U) The May 3 edition of Le Monde carries a short
article about President Chirac's remarks to a large
cultural meeting in Paris the previous day. Le Monde
notes that "without mentioning Hollywood nor speaking
about American hegemony, Mr. Chirac warned about the
immense danger of uniformity..." The article also
quotes Chirac as saying, "France will push with all its
weight to ensure that an international convention on
cultural diversity is signed at UNESCO this fall." We
have seen the complete remarks and they are strong on
the need for Europe to stand for the cultural exception
and against a free market in "cultural goods."



4. (C) The Mission also interprets the clash during
UNESCO's recent Executive Board over the European
Union's attempt to expand its participation in the
cultural diversity negotiations as one more sign of
French determination to push for the convention. It
was clear that the French had lobbied member states
(especially the Francophonie) hard, and successfully to
support their resolution. We were informed by members
of other EU delegations that France was so confident of
its success that it resisted the consensus resolution
and was determined to push for a vote. (Note: UNESCO
prides itself on being a consensus organization and
seldom relies on votes.)


5. (SBU) At a Group I (WEOG) meeting on April 13,

the United States and France both presented candidates
for the chairmanship of the General Conference Legal
Committee. This is an important position because this
committee will need to make the decision to waive
UNESCO's rule that stipulates that in order for the
General Conference to adopt a convention, it must be
ready seven months before the start of the Conference
in October. In an unusual secret ballot, a strong
majority selected the French candidate. (Comment:
clearly most EU countries were unwilling to vote
against another EU member, though we do know that the
UK, Italy, and the Netherlands supported us. Other
support came from Canada, Turkey and Switzerland.)


6. (C) The importance France placed on that vote
became clear earlier that week when French Ambassador
to UNESCO, Jean Guigenou, made a transparent suggestion
to Ambassador Oliver that the US consider seeking
positions on other bureaus or as a vice chair of the
Executive Board rather than the chair of the General
Conference legal committee. After the April 13 Group
One meeting, Guigenou told Ambassador Oliver that "we
had made a mistake." Note: We understand that
Guigenou, a former Ambassador to the UK and one of
France's highest ranking diplomats, was personally
chosen by Chirac to push the cultural diversity agenda
at UNESCO.)


7. (C) Comment: Much UNESCO business is now being
looked at through the prism of the cultural diversity
negotiations. We interpret the French desire to have
the EU take over negotiations on cultural diversity as
a way to keep wayward states in line. Our Greek, UK,
Czech and Polish counterparts tell us privately that
they are not pleased with the way France is steering
the process. Of course, we never do get a straight
answer why the EU has to be at the negotiations. The
Commission's cultural types are the ones sitting at the
table, when the competence the Commission claims is
over trade.


8. (C) Comment continued: We are disappointed with
the outcome of the vote on the chairmanship of the
legal committee. While we still have a seat on the
committee, the chairman will be key in setting the
agenda for the General Conference and could conceivably
push a flawed convention forward for consideration. We
also take the strength of support for France as a sign
that certain countries do not want to cross France.
Portugal, which has been actively seeking US support
for a seat on the Executive Board, still chose to vote
against our candidate despite our heavy lobbying. We
also had hoped to pick up votes among the Nordic
countries.


9. (C) Comment continued: We have been at pains not
to depict our presence at UNESCO as a battle between
French and US influence. Though the tensions have been
clear in the cultural diversity negotiations, we have
publicly sought to downplay them. Recent events are
bringing these tensions into the open. In a sense,
UNESCO has been France's playground for many years, and
it enjoys huge influence in the organization. We
cannot avoid the reality that French influence is
enhanced because UNESCO is in Paris where the French
can draw on almost unlimited resources, including the
frequent appearance of President Chirac to push their
agenda. France is also skillfully using the EU and
other groups like the Francophonie to thwart US
interests. We expect that France will continue to see
UNESCO as the "soft underbelly" of the UN system to
push an agenda counter to US interests and we will push
back firmly. End Comment.

OLIVER