Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05PARAMARIBO828
2005-12-20 18:27:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Paramaribo
Cable title:  

PROPOSED ARTICLE 98 SIGNING STIRS CRITICAL

Tags:  PREL PGOV MARR NS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS PARAMARIBO 000828 

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR: LLUFTIG
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR NS
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ARTICLE 98 SIGNING STIRS CRITICAL
REACTIONS

REF: PARAMARIBO 811

UNCLAS PARAMARIBO 000828

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR: LLUFTIG
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR NS
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ARTICLE 98 SIGNING STIRS CRITICAL
REACTIONS

REF: PARAMARIBO 811


1. (U) Summary. President Venetiaan's December 6 statement
that Suriname plans to join the International Criminal
Court (ICC) and sign a bilateral non-surrender (Article 98)
agreement with the United States continues to reverberate
in the press. It has been given new life by an Amnesty
International (AI) statement of December 15 urging that
Suriname's parliamentarians refuse to ratify an Article 98
agreement. The United States is widely condemned in the
press. End Summary.


2. (U) President Venetiaan's December 6 statement in
parliament (see reftel) prompted an Amnesty International
statement on December 15 praising his decision to become
party to the Court, while expressing concern about his
decision to enter into an Article 98. Stating incorrectly
that the United States has been actively campaigning
against the Court, AI labels Article 98 agreements
"impunity agreements" which it describes as illegal and in
violation of other international conventions. (A copy of
the statement is available on AI website.) The statement
goes on to urge parliamentarians to "declare that they will
not ratify any such unlawful agreement if it is signed." In
this current round of discussions, the only
parliamentarians to speak out against an Article 98
agreement are two members of the governing New Front Plus
coalition, Sharmila Mangal and Ruth Wijdenbosch. Ms.
Wijdenbosch is a member of the President's party and former
deputy Speaker of Parliament. Wijdenbosch is quoted as
saying the U.S. doesn't provide that much military
assistance, so losing it for a matter of principle
shouldn't be an issue.


3. (U) The media has been busy with the story. A local
radio station used excerpts from an earlier interview with
the Ambassador to provide a rejoinder to the AI statement
on Friday morning, leaving the impression that the Embassy
was remarkably quick off the mark in responding.
Displaying the penchant for wild association which
characterizes much of its work, some in the press
speculated that USSOUTHCOM General Craddock's quick visit
on Friday, December 16 was linked to controversy over a
possible Article 98 agreement. A weekend piece in
Keerpunt, a widely read political column, condemns the Bush
Administration for the War in Iraq which it says was
undertaken under false pretenses and tests, on a daily
basis, international law. It chastises the U.S. for the
abuses in Iraqi prisons and in Guantanamo and asks what
happened to the American way of life and respect for other
nations. The article concludes that someone accused of war
crimes or crimes against humanity must be surrendered to
the ICC. Monday's Times of Suriname had a nasty cartoon
showing the U.S. trampling Iraq for oil and ignoring
prisoners in Guantanamo, while a tiny President Venetiaan
eagerly approaches with an agreement and American flag. An
accompanying editorial accused the U.S. of creating too
many victims as it pursued its goals and said it was in
fact the cause of much of today's terrorism. It also stated
that most of the civilized world had concluded that those
guilty of crimes against humanity needed to be punished.
While applauding the opposition of Ms. Wijdenbosch, the
paper concluded that she couldn't be taken seriously as
members of the coalition lacked the gumption to cross the
leadership of the President.


4. (SBU) In a meeting with General Craddock on Friday,
President Venetiaan reaffirmed his intent to conclude an
Article 98, but noted this would take time; it would need
to be ratified by the Parliament, but the politics wouldn't
be easy, even though the government has a majority.


5. (SBU) Comment: The President's announcement and the AI
reaction have unleashed a flood of criticism of the U.S.,
much of it visceral and uninformed. This very reaction
will, we believe, cause a government not known for moving
with alacrity to let the ICC/Article 98 issues simmer on
the back burner for some considerable time. President
Venetiaan has indicated an appreciation for the challenges
the U.S. faces as the sole superpower which distinguishes
it from every other nation. This has not, we believe, been
the sole calculus in his decision. The military has pressed
the civilian leadership on this issue, having a more
realistic assessment of the value of American military
assistance than Ms. Wijdenbosch. We will continue to urge
the government to sign an agreement sooner, rather than
later. In spite of the good state of civil-military
relations, many in the current government, from the


President on down, remain wary of an institution that twice
staged successful coups. Our challenge will be to ensure
that an Article 98 does not become a source of friction in
civilmilitary relations.

BARNES


NNNN