Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05PANAMA2260
2005-11-18 13:45:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Panama
Cable title:  

CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT REPORT

Tags:  ETRD ECON EFIN ECONOMIC AFFAIRS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PANAMA 002260 

SIPDIS

FOR EB/TPP
ALSO FOR WHA/CEN - G. SCHIFFER
STATE PASS USTR/K. RICHARDSON AND R. SMITH

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON EFIN ECONOMIC AFFAIRS
SUBJECT: CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT REPORT

REF: (A) STATE 188288
(B) PANAMA 1539

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PANAMA 002260

SIPDIS

FOR EB/TPP
ALSO FOR WHA/CEN - G. SCHIFFER
STATE PASS USTR/K. RICHARDSON AND R. SMITH

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON EFIN ECONOMIC AFFAIRS
SUBJECT: CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT REPORT

REF: (A) STATE 188288
(B) PANAMA 1539


1. Per ref A, post has emailed the below text to USTR for
inclusion in the Sixth Report to Congress on the Operation
of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (CBERA). As
noted ref B, the CBERA and Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership
Act have boosted Panama's exports to the U.S., particularly
non-traditional agricultural products such as pineapple and
watermelon. Post's survey of private firms earlier in 2005
indicated that most new agricultural projects would not have
been initiated absent the CBERA/CBTPA program.

Begin text of input for CBERA report:


2. Country Reports: Compliance with Eligibility Criteria

The country reports contained in this section focus
particular attention on current performance of CBI countries
with respect to the eligibility criteria reflected in the
CBTPA, as the most recent expression of U.S. policy
objectives linked to the extension of CBI benefits. The pre-
existing eligibility conditions of the CBERA are also
reflected in the country reports, where relevant. Population
statistics are drawn from the Panamanian government's July
2005 estimate. Per capita income figures reflect gross
national income statistics published in the World Bank's
2004 World Development Report.



3. Economic Review

Approximately 80% of Panama's economy is services-based, led
by maritime transportation, banking, commerce, financial
services, and tourism. Industry and agriculture represent
about 14% and 6%, respectively, of Panama's economy. Trade
and financial ties with the United States are close. Panama
attracted major investments in the latter half of the 1990s
through privatization efforts in the energy,
telecommunications, and transportation sectors. Foreign
direct investment fell dramatically from $1.2 billion in
1998 to only $99 million in 2002 due largely to the winding
up of privatization projects, but has since rebounded to
just over $1 billion in 2004.

Panama's GDP posted its strongest growth in six years in
2004, growing by 7.6%. The Ministry of Economy and Finance
(MEF) expects GDP to grow by about 5% in 2005. The
Torrijos Administration inherited a fiscal defict equal to
about 5% of GDP upon taking office in September 2004, which

exceeded the 2% limit set by Panama's 2002 fiscal
responsibility law. The government of Panama is working
bring its deficit to about 3.6% of GDP in 2005 through
increased tax revenues and reduced growth in spending.

Panama's healthy GDP growth has yet to translate into widely
shared prosperity, as some 40% of Panamanians remain mired
in poverty (topping 80% in rural indigenous communities).
The country also has the second-worst income distribution in
Latin America, as the richest 20% hold about two-thirds of
Panama's wealth, while the poorest 20% hold only about 1.5%
of national wealth. Moreover, unemployment in Panama has
remained at 12-16% in recent years. In November 2005, the
government reported a drop in unemployment from 11.8% to
9.6%, attributed largely to growth in informal employment.
Approximately 20-25% of the workforce is underemployed.

Panama's dollarized economy has typically enjoyed low rates
of inflation (hovering around 1% per year). However, annual
inflation reached 3.5% by late 2005 - the highest rate the
country has seen in some 23 years -- owing to an upward
spiral of global oil prices. (As Panama has no domestic oil
or gas reserves, it is completely dependent upon imports for
fossil fuels.)


4. Commitment to WTO and FTAA

Panama completed its accession to the WTO in 1997. As part
of the accession process, Panama's government initiated a
number of significant trade policy reforms, including
reduced tariffs and non-tariff barriers, elimination of
production subsidies, greater disciplines in the area of
competition policy, and strengthened protection of
intellectual property. Some of this progress was reversed
after late 1999, particularly with increased tariffs and non-
tariff barriers to agricultural and food products. Frequent
problems in the GOP's non-science-based use of sanitary and
phytosanitary restrictions have been of particular concern
to U.S. exporters, typified by the Ministry of Agriculture's
freeze on import permits for U.S. beef for much of 2005,
ostensibly over concerns about a second case of "mad cow"
disease found in the United States. Despite these concerns,
however, Panama is generally more open to imports of goods
and services than was the case prior to its WTO accession.
At 8%, Panama's average tariff is one of the lowest in Latin
America, although it retains high tariffs on some
agricultural products, e.g., 273% for chicken, 63-159% for
dairy products, 83% for potatoes and tomatoes, 74% for pork,
and 55% for rice.

Panama has been a strong supporter of the FTAA process and
played a constructive role in trying to advance FTAA
progress at the November 2005 Summit of the Americas.
Panama previously hosted the Administrative Secretariat of
the FTAA and served as the site for FTAA negotiations during
the March 2001 - February 2003 period.
Panama has actively pursued bilateral free trade agreements
in recent years, having signed FTAs with El Salvador (2002),
Taiwan, (2003),and Singapore (2005). The U.S. and Panama
have held eight rounds of FTA negotiations over the past two
years. In November 2005, Presidents Bush and Torrijos each
expressed their desire to conclude an FTA as soon as
possible. Panama has also sought an FTA with Chile and is
in exploratory discussions for FTAs with Mexico, Mercosur,
the Andean Community, and CARICOM.


5. Protection of Intellectual Property:

Intellectual property protection has improved greatly since
the mid-1990s when the country passed several strong new
laws and began enforcing them vigorously. By virtue of
acceding to the WTO as a developed country, Panama was
obliged to have TRIPs-compliant legislation in force
immediately upon its accession in 1997. Industry
representatives and legal experts are in broad agreement
that Panama has made progress in setting intellectual
property rights standards above the minimum afforded under
TRIPs.




6. Provision of Internationally Recognized Worker Rights:

The law protects the right of private sector workers to
organize and join unions, though unions must be registered
by the government. About 13 percent of the workforce is
organized. Most civil servants may join unions and bargain
with their respective agencies. Workers employed by the
Panama Canal Authority may join unions and bargain
collectively but are prohibited from striking.

Collective bargaining is protected by law for private sector
workers and is widely practiced. In the public sector, only
a small proportion of civil servants may bargain
collectively and strike. The minimum wage law does apply in
export processing zones, and the Government issued Law 3 of
1997 that might limit effective union organization in the
zones, including the restriction of strikes and negotiations
with workers who are not represented by a union. Unions
assert that this latter practice results in negotiations
with employee groups that are dominated by employers.

The employment of children under age 14 is prohibited by
law. Children under age fifteen may work only if they have
completed primary school. In 2003, the National Child Labor
Survey results estimated that 57,524 children ages 5 to 17
years in Panama were working (7 percent of this age group).
It is estimated that 11 percent of children between the ages
of 10 and 17 work. This is particularly problematic in the
agricultural sector among indigenous populations. Education
is compulsory through the equivalent of the ninth grade, but
enforcement and compliance are uneven. (It should be noted,
however, that these figures are from a survey done in 2000
and published in 2003. In June 2005, the GOP created a
committee of 27 government and non-governmental
organizations that expects to produce updated figures
through a new survey.)

The Labor Code establishes minimum wages by regions and
industries. Most urban workers employed in the formal
sector are paid the legal minimum or more. It also
establishes a standard workweek of forty-eight hours and
provides for at least one 24-hour rest period weekly. The
Ministry of Labor enforces workplace health and safety laws,
though the emphasis is more on safety rather than long-term
health. The Labor Code also prohibits forced or bonded
labor by adults and children.


7. Commitments to Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child Labor

On October 31, 2000, Panama ratified ILO Convention 182.
Panama has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the ILO
International Program for the Elimination of Child Labor and
is working with the ILO on various programs aimed at phasing
out exploitative child labor. Panama has developed a strong
legal framework to combat the worst forms of child labor,
including a prohibition on employment of minors under the
age of 18 in hazardous labor. Panama has also established a
special office within the Ministry of Labor to oversee child
labor issues. However, some concerns exist with respect to
involvement of children in rural coffee and sugar
plantations and in the informal sector of the urban economy.
Institutional mechanisms to investigate child labor and
provide prevention services are slowly being strengthened.


8. Counter-Narcotics Cooperation

The United States and Panama have a long and productive
relationship in the counter-narcotics area. Panama has
received unconditional certification as cooperating with the
United States on counter-narcotics efforts.


9. Implementation of the Inter-American Convention Against
Corruption

Panama is a party to the IACAC, but has not yet fully
implemented or enforced several of the convention's
provisions. Allegations of official corruption have been
featured in local media, often prompting libel actions
against reporters and publishers, which have a chilling
effect on media and reporting. Legal processes are in place
to allow investigation of citizen complaints about alleged
corruption, but few investigations have resulted in criminal
charges. Documented delays in judicial resolution of high
profile cases reinforce the belief that while individuals
who engage in acts of petty corruption are often punished,
high-ranking public officials act with impunity and have
little interest in allowing public scrutiny of government
expenditures.


10. Transparency in Government Procurement

Procurement practices of government ministries and
institutions vary widely. Lack of transparency, excessive
delays, and bureaucratic machinations have caused problems
for the United States and other bidders on important
contracts in the past. Panama submitted an initial offer to
accede to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement in 1997
and made a revised offer in early 1999. Accession
negotiations had not been concluded as of late 2005.

EATON