Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05NEWDELHI5912
2005-07-29 13:12:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:  

BHUTANESE DRAFT CONSTITUTION: A STEP IN THE RIGHT

Tags:  PGOV PHUM PREF PREL ECON KDEM KIRF SENV IN NP BT 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 08 NEW DELHI 005912 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/27/2015
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREF PREL ECON KDEM KIRF SENV IN NP BT
SUBJECT: BHUTANESE DRAFT CONSTITUTION: A STEP IN THE RIGHT
DIRECTION

Classified By: Charge Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 08 NEW DELHI 005912

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/27/2015
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREF PREL ECON KDEM KIRF SENV IN NP BT
SUBJECT: BHUTANESE DRAFT CONSTITUTION: A STEP IN THE RIGHT
DIRECTION

Classified By: Charge Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)


1. (C) Summary: The RGOB released a draft constitution on
March 26, continuing the process of democratic reform started
when the King abdicated power to a council of ministers in

1998. The draft, if approved, would create a constitutional
monarchy with a Parliament consisting of an upper and lower
house, as well as executive and legislative branches. King
Wangchuck's decision to implement the constitution advances
his own interests in preserving his role and protecting
Bhutanese sovereignty, but it also constitutes a remarkable
concession of power that will help usher Bhutan into the
modern world. Human rights activists and Bhutanese refugee
leaders were critical, stating that the constitution does not
adequately protect human rights, solidifies the power of the
monarchy and allows the king to maintain de facto control
over the government. Their comments reflect the fact that
the constitution has serious imperfections and will not
result in an instant transition to liberal democracy.
Bhutan's King is determined to avoid the pitfalls found by
the hereditary leaders of neighboring Nepal and Sikkim. Many
Bhutanese citizens need convincing democracy is the best way
forward, due to the many problems in governance they see in
the democracies in the region. End Summary.

Background: A Step Forward a Long Time Coming
--------------


2. (C) On March 26 the Royal Government of Bhutan (RGOB)
released a draft constitution to the public, bringing the
country a step closer to fulfilling King Wangchuck's promise
to transform the isolated Himalayan kingdom into a
constitutional monarchy. The process began in 1998, when the
King formally devolved executive powers to a Council of
Ministers elected by secret ballot in the National Assembly.
Although an important step at the time, the King maintains a

large amount of control by personally selecting a sizable
portion of the 150-member National Assembly. Under the
current system, the general population elects 105
representatives, the king appoints 35 and the Buddhist clergy
selects 10. The members appointed by the King and the clergy
vote in a solid bank with the Monarchy, requiring that King
Wangchuck only garner 31 of the remaining 105 votes to
prevail on any given issue. This allows the King effectively
to control appointments to the Council of Ministers and the
judiciary. With the Council of Ministers acting as the
country's Executive Branch, the King retains considerable
control over the day-to-day operations of the government.


3. (U) The draft constitution was written by a 39-member
committee, chaired by the Chief Justice of the High Court and
comprised of the Speaker of the National Assembly, two
Buddhist monks, one elected member from each of Bhutan's 20
dzongkhags (districts),the Royal Advisory Council (a
nine-member board consisting of six members chosen from the
National Assembly, two by the clergy and one appointed by the
King),five representatives from the civil service and three
High Court lawyers. The document was reviewed by the
National Assembly and has now been distributed to the people
of Bhutan for their examination. During the review period,
King Wangchuck plans personally to discuss the document with
the populace, before it goes to a national referendum, which
the RGOB has yet to schedule. Bhutanese Ambassador to India
Tshering told Poloff on July 13 that monsoon rains would

SIPDIS
likely hold up the King's consultations with the people until
the end of the summer. A copy of the constitution is
available on line at www.constitution.bt.

Overview of the Constitution: Looks Decent on Paper
-------------- --------------


4. (C) The constitution would create a constitutional
monarchy with a Parliament consisting of an upper and lower
house, along with executive and judicial branches. The
constitution prescribes a two-party system, with the majority
party selecting a Prime Minister. The electorate will select
Members of Parliament through two rounds of elections. The
first round will be open to any registered party. The two
parties that receive the most votes in the first round will
then face off in a second round to determine which will form
the government. The constitution specifies that no political
party can be based on region, sex, language, religion or
place of origin, must promote national unity and must "strive
to ensure the well-being of the nation." The constitution
would also outlaw political parties banned by the current
government, and obligate the opposition party to play a
"constructive role" and promote national integrity, unity and
harmony among all sections of society.


5. (C) The new constitution won endorsement from at least
one important RGOB critic. Vice President Kesang Lhendup of
the Druk National Congress (DNC),a political party
representing eastern Bhutanese expelled from the country in
the mid 1990's, opined that a government formed under the
constitution would allow his group to return. "Democracy is
what we have been asking for," stated Lhendup "and those
wishes would be answered by this constitution." He
acknowledged that the constitution is not perfect and
predicted it would "evolve and improve over time." The
constitution defines the role of the monarchy as well as its
powers and benefits. It sets Buddhism as the spiritual
heritage of the country, while granting freedom of religion
as a fundamental right. The document also guarantees the
right to life, liberty, security, freedom of speech and
press, freedom of movement, and the due process of law. The
constitution allows for national referendums, and describes
how the RGOB can declare a state of emergency, remove the
king from power, and replace him with the crown prince.

Reasons for Change: It Suits the King
--------------


6. (C) Delhi-based analysts shared differing opinions on
King Wangchuck's reasons for seeking the creation of
democracy in Bhutan. Some believe he genuinely wants
political reform, while others believe he is merely using the
process to solidify his control over the country. South
Asian Studies Foundation Director Dr. Parmanand maintained
that the King is dedicated to true democratic reforms and saw
the constitution as one more step in that direction.
Parmanand acknowledged that the King maintains a large degree
of power under the constitution, but indicated that political
change moves slowly in Bhutan and was confident that the
system will continue to evolve into a truly representational
democracy. DNC's Lhendup told us that while the King is a
forward thinking man and understands Bhutan's need for
democracy, he would remain in control of the government if
the constitution were formalized in its current iteration.
Lhendup reiterated that the DNC, which currently is not
allowed to operate in Bhutan, hoped to return after the
constitution is accepted. Interlocutors also asserted that
most Bhutanese currently do not want the system of government
in the Kingdom to change, because of shortcomings they see in
the democracies around them. Due to severe governance issues
and opaque decision making processes in India, Nepal and
Bangladesh, Bhutanese will need convincing that democracy is
the best way forward.

The Long-Term Plan: Avoid Being Swallowed By India
-------------- --------------


7. (C) South Asian Human Rights Documentation Center
(SAHRDC) Director Ravi Nair agreed that the constitution is a
step forward, but commented that King Wangchuck's true motive
is to solidify and legitimize his power. He argued that the
King understands that he must shed the antiquated monarchical
system and embrace modern government to be taken seriously in
the international arena. Nair argued that the King was
strongly influenced by the experiences of Nepal and Sikkim,
and is determined not to repeat their mistakes. The King,
according to Nair, believes that Nepal's numerous regional
and ethnic political parties do not work for the national
interest and is determined to limit this possible source of
friction in Bhutan. Nair also theorized that Wangchuck is
determined that Bhutan does not follow Sikkim's example and
be absorbed by India. Noting that a steady migration of
Nepalese preceded Sikkim's 1975 annexation by India, Nair
theorized that King Wangchuck sees a close parallel to Bhutan
and designed this constitution to pre-empt more radical
change and make certain this will not happen to his country.


8. (C) Nair suggested that King Wangchuck could be using the
constitution to legitimize his control over the country,
noting that the Bhutan populace has yet to consent officially
to the rule of the Wangchuck monarchy. Until 1907, Bhutan
was governed by a feudal system, with each dzongkhag
(district) ruled by a different family. During the Raj, the
British hoped to negotiate a route through Bhutan to Tibet,
but found it difficult to deal with so many disparate power
centers. In order to simplify negotiations, the British
signed an agreement with the Baron of the Trongsa dzongkhag,
Ugyen Wangchuck, naming him king of Bhutan. Nair argued that
the acceptance of the constitution would, for the first time,
truly legitimize Wangchuck rule in Bhutan.


9. (C) Dr. Parmanand, who is also the author of a book on
Bhutanese politics, agreed with Nair's historical assessment
of the Wangchuck Dynasty's rise to power, but argued that its
legitimacy is not in question. Parmanand asserted that the
Bhutanese people, including other noble families, recognize
the Wangchucks as the legitimate monarchs and the King does
not need a constitution to legitimize his reign. Parmanand
stated the king has kept the other feudal lords (Dashos)
content by providing them numerous benefits, such as greater
access to business licenses and government jobs. Parmanand
noted that the Dashos, who are small in number, would
continue to receive preferential treatment under the proposed
government and would not oppose the constitution.

Concerns and Praise: On the Whole, A Good Start
-------------- --


10. (C) Our interlocutors warned that the constitution
contains many contradictions and ensures that much authority
will continue to rest with the King, while mentioning a
number of positive aspects. They listed the following issues
as significant:

-- Article 1 (Kingdom of Bhutan) states that "Bhutan is a
sovereign kingdom and sovereign power belongs to the people
of Bhutan," however, other sections grant the king extensive
powers and immunity. The king has veto power over laws
passed by parliament, can reverse executive council
decisions, sack the executive council, and remains supreme
commander of the armed forces. The king is also above the
law and cannot by tried in court for any reason, although
provision does exist for his removal from office.

-- Article 2 (The Institution of the Monarchy) solidifies the
Wangchuck line as the hereditary rulers of Bhutan and
stipulates that this article cannot be amended or changed in
any way. This section gives control of all "Royal Projects"
to the King, but does not define them. DNC Secretary Karma
Dupthop stated that numerous work and construction ventures
fall under the purview of "Royal Projects," giving the King
control over large capital programs. This section also
allows the King to demand that bills of his choosing be
introduced in Parliament while reserving all power not
otherwise listed in the constitution for himself. He would
also have the authority to appoint the Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court without consulting with others in government.
SAHRDC's Nair noted that since the judiciary is responsible
for many of the checks enshrined in the constitution, the
King's ability to choose the Chief Justice calls the validity
of those checks into question.

Constitutional Checks
--------------

11. (C) The constitution does limit the King's authority by
forcing him to step down at age 65 and relinquish the thrown
to the crown prince. Most notably, it stipulates that a
joint sitting of Parliament can call for the King to abdicate
his thrown for willfully violating the constitution or
permanent mental disability. The King must also abdicate,
again to the crown prince, if three-fourths of Parliament
pass a vote of no confidence in a joint sitting, followed by
a national referendum in which a simple majority of the
electorate votes for his removal. Our interlocutors agreed
that the ability of the National Assembly to call for the
King's removal is a very important and positive aspect of the
constitution.

-- Article 3 (Spiritual Heritage) stipulates that Buddhism is
the "spiritual heritage of Bhutan," promoting the values of
peace, non-violence, compassion and tolerance. This section
also states that religion shall remain separate from
politics. Interlocutors questioned how this was possible,
considering the numerous references to Buddhism throughout
the document.

-- Article 4 (Culture) had no provisions deemed problematic.

-- Article 5 (Environment) was hailed as significant for
creating constitutional safeguards to protect the fragile
high-altitude ecosystem of Bhutan. Dr. Parmanand emphasized
that this Article would prevent the type of deforestation and
environmental degradation found in Nepal. Notably, it calls
for 60 percent forest cover nationwide at all times, and
environmentally sustainable economic development. However,
the DNC questioned Bhutan's environmental record, stating
that the RGOB has "failed miserably" in protecting the
environment and that "deforestation and land degradation
takes place continuously," due to tree harvesting and mining
projects.

-- Article 6 (Citizenship) does not alter the status quo.
This section states that questions concerning citizenship
shall be, "subject to the provisions of this Article and the
Citizenship Act," and that Parliament may regulate the issue.
Dr. Parmanand commented that this article could make it
difficult for Bhutanese refugees in Nepal to regain their
citizenship, because it contains a number of hurdles that
they must overcome. It mentions that any person applying for
citizenship must have "no record of having spoken or acted
against the King, the Country and the People of Bhutan," and
must be able to read and write Dzongkha, which many people in
the camps do not speak.

-- Article 7 (Fundamental Rights) lists numerous rights
bestowed to the Bhutanese people, including freedom of
speech, assembly, press, movement, from arbitrary arrest, and
the right to property, work, and a fair trial. However, this
article also allows the state to create, "reasonable
restrictions" in the interests of "peace and stability and
the well being of the nation" and "friendly relations with
foreign states." Nair and DNC's Dupthop asserted that these
clauses give the government wide latitude to control other
freedoms listed in this article. Dupthop commented that if
the government decides a person's comments offend an allied
nation, it could censure or arrest him or her. Nair also
warned that the RGOB could declare a demonstration against
government policies to be against the "well-being of the
nation" and take action against the protesters.

-- Article 8 (Fundamental Duties) lists responsibilities of
the citizenry and did not raise concerns.

-- Article 9 (Principles of State Policy) was not deemed
problematic, and mentions the country's commitment to the
pursuit of "Gross National Happiness (GNH)." Interlocutors
postulated that the RGOB's decision to strive for GNH as
opposed to other indicators of success fits with Buddhist
ideals and could be the right avenue for the country, but
wondered how it would be measured.

-- Article 10 (Parliament) lists the powers vested in the
National Council and the National Assembly. The DNC noted
that this section grants the King the ability to send
messages to the assembly, and convene extraordinary sessions.

-- Article 11 (The National Council) allows the king to
appoint five of the 25 members of the upper house of
Parliament. Dupthop observed that this would give the king a
"considerable head start," with 20 percent of the votes on a
given issue. This section also states that candidates for
the council "shall neither belong to nor have affiliation to
any political party." Dupthop noted that it was not clear
whether prior affiliation to a party would disqualify a
candidate from office.

-- Article 12 (The National Assembly) specifies the size and
terms of the lower house. The DNC claimed the constitution
is not fully democratic because it does not provide for
"one-man-one-vote" (sic). It would create a federalist
structure in which each dzongkhag would have between 2 and 7
seats in the National Assembly. The DNC argued that this
would be inherently unfair, as it would give districts with a
smaller electorate greater legislative power than more
populous ones.

-- Article 13 (Passing of Bills) grants full veto power over
all legislation to the King. Nair argued that this is a
major deviation from "modern" constitutional monarchies in
which royals are generally figureheads rather than actual
heads of state. He proffered that Bhutan should have
followed the British or Dutch models in allocating powers to
the monarchy. Parmanand noted that most Bhutanese would be
pleased that the King retains final authority over
legislation, because they are still relatively uncomfortable
with democracy and see him as an important safeguard against
the unknown.

-- Article 14 (Finance, Trade and Commerce) was not
controversial according to our sources.

-- Article 15 (Political Parties),our interlocutors argued,
sets serious limits on political freedoms in Bhutan. This
section states that "political parties shall ensure that
national interests prevail over all other interests" and that
they shall "promote national unity," ensuring the well being
of the nation. Dupthop and Nair commented that these
statements are very open-ended and leave much room for
interpretation. "The government can use this article as the
basis to crack down on political parties that do not agree
with the administration," argued Dupthop. This section
allows the Supreme Court to dissolve a party it deems
contravenes the constitution. Lhendup warned that this
section, along with the other vague sections dealing with
individuals' rights, leaves opposition parties vulnerable,
especially since the Chief Justice is beholden to the King.

Political Rational
--------------


12. (C) King Wangchuck told Poloff during an October 2004
meeting that one goal of the constitution would be to limit
regional, ethnic and religious tensions in the political
system. The constitution states that these issues cannot be
used for electoral gain and sets a two-tiered election system
to limit their influence. The first round of elections would
be open to all political parties, with the top two vote
getters squaring off in a second round. Dr. Parmanand
commented that this system would successfully limit the
influence of numerous regional parties and ensure that the
two parties elected to parliament have a wider support base.

-- Article 16 (Public Campaign Financing) attempts to limit
monetary inequities by creating an Election Commission to
allocate resources evenly to all political parties and fix
campaign expenditures.

-- Article 17 (Formation of Government) states that the
majority party would chose the Prime Minister and sets a
two-term limit for him or her, states that ministers must be
members of the National Assembly and that only two ministers
may be chosen from any given dzongkhag. The DNC warned that
Article 17 gives the King the authority to appoint ministers
only on the "recommendation" of the Prime Minister, therefore
giving him full control over executive branch appointments.

-- Article 18 (The Opposition Party) specifies that the party
in opposition act as a check against the ruling party and
"shall promote national integrity, unity and harmony and
co-operation among all sections of society." It also states
"the opposition party shall not allow party interests to
prevail over the national interest. Its aim must be to make
the Government responsible, accountable and transparent."
DNC's Dupthop questioned who would decide whether the
opposition was performing this role and the penalties for
failure.

-- Article 19 (Interim Government) was not seen as
problematic by our interlocutors.
-- Article 20 (The Executive) determines the powers of the
executive branch and creates the Council of Ministers, headed
by the Prime Minister. Pundits noted that this article
clearly confers last word on many issues to the monarchy in
that it states that the Prime Minister shall advise the king
in the exercise of his functions, but that the king my
"require the Council of Ministers to reconsider such advice."
The Article continues that the council "shall be
collectively responsible to the king and Parliament," and the
DNC argued this indicates the king can dismiss the body.

-- Article 21 (The Judiciary) creates the court system and
sets term limits for judges. Terms for Supreme Court judges
are 10 years, or the age of 65 and the Chief Justice must
step down after five years. This section also calls for a
High Court and a National Judicial Committee consisting of
the Chief Justice, the senior-most Supreme Court judge, the
chairperson of the legislative committee of the National
Assembly and the Attorney General. Local pundits expressed
concern over royal control over the judiciary, because the
article states the king can appoint the Chief Justice upon
"consultation" with the National Judicial Committee. Dupthop
noted that while the King must discuss his choice with the
legal body, he does not need its approval.

-- Article 22 (Local Governments) sets rules for formation of
district, town and village administration. SAHRDC's Nair
commented that this section does not adequately specify the
power of local governments.

-- Article 23 (Elections) determines voter and candidate
qualifications, as well as election regulations. This
section states that no person under "foreign protection" can
run for office. The DNC noted that this statement ensures
that no refugees can be elected. This article also
disqualifies candidates who have been terminated from public
office or convicted of any criminal offense that included a
prison sentence. (Comment: The RGOB forced many Bhutanese of
Nepali origin into "compulsory retirement" during the
mid-1990's. It is possible that these people would be
considered "terminated from government service" and unable to
run for public office. End Comment.)

-- Article 24 (The Royal Audit Authority),Article 25 (The
Royal Civil Service Commission),and Article 26 (The
Anti-Corruption Commission) were viewed by our interlocutors
as beneficial and would facilitate the development of an
accountable and transparent bureaucracy.

-- Article 27 (Defense) stipulates that the King is the
supreme commander of the armed forces. It allows for a draft
in times of crisis and states that the military may only be
used for self-defense.

-- Article 28 (The Attorney General),Article 29 (The Pay
Commission) and Article 30 (Holders of Constitutional
Offices),Article 31 (Impeachment) were not commented on by
our interlocutors.

-- Article 32 (National Referendum) allows the electorate to
pass a referendum by a simple majority. However, it
stipulates that a referendum cannot be held on questions
relating to taxation.

-- Article 33 (Emergency) allows the king to call a national
emergency in times of crises. The National Assembly, with
only 1/4th of the members voting against the measure, can
overturn the state of emergency. Dupthop praised this
provision, arguing it will prevent abuse.

-- Article 34 (Amendment and Authoritative Text) states an
amendment to the constitution may initiated by simple
majority and passed by no less than 3/4th of the vote, and
must be approved by the king.

Comment: A Constitutional Monarchy with a Capital "M"
-------------- --------------


13. (C) Although it reserves numerous and extensive powers
for the King, the draft constitution is an important step
towards democracy. Should it be implemented in its present
form, the constitution would allow the Monarchy to maintain
effective control over the government, while appearing to be
uninvolved. The Constitution also contains loopholes the
could inhibit fundamental and political rights. However,
most Bhutanese will favor a constitution allowing the
monarchy to remain a central player and will likely endorse
the charter with few changes. Many Bhutanese are still not
convinced that democracy is the best form of government, but
will agree to the transformation due to the King's support
for the constitution and his assertion that "a country cannot
rely on a bloodline to provide the best leaders." Despite
the constitution's many shortcomings, it is a step forward by
King Wangchuck is clearly acting to preserve Bhutan's
sovereignty, but also is committed to granting his people
more prerogatives. Although, the constitution would not
instantly create a modern liberal democracy, it shows the
King is willing to relinquish power in a way that few
politicians are inclined to do.
BLAKE