Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05NAIROBI2571
2005-06-22 12:01:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Nairobi
Cable title:  

KENYA ARTICLE 98: ANTI-U.S. CENSURE MOTION MAY

Tags:  PREL ECON SOCI SENV PGOV EAGR PINS MASS KE 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L NAIROBI 002571 

SIPDIS

LONDON AND PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHERS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/12/2025
TAGS: PREL ECON SOCI SENV PGOV EAGR PINS MASS KE
SUBJECT: KENYA ARTICLE 98: ANTI-U.S. CENSURE MOTION MAY
HAVE LITTLE TRACTION

REF: A: NAIROBI 02446

Classified By: ACTING POL/C LISA PETERSON, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L NAIROBI 002571

SIPDIS

LONDON AND PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHERS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/12/2025
TAGS: PREL ECON SOCI SENV PGOV EAGR PINS MASS KE
SUBJECT: KENYA ARTICLE 98: ANTI-U.S. CENSURE MOTION MAY
HAVE LITTLE TRACTION

REF: A: NAIROBI 02446

Classified By: ACTING POL/C LISA PETERSON, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (C) SUMMARY. Kenyan newspapers reported during the week
of June 13 that MP Paul Muite had filed a motion in
Parliament to censure the U.S. for attempting to arm-twist
Kenya into signing an Article 98 agreement. A reliable
source in Parliament reported, however, that, as of June 21,
no such motion had been received. Given more pressing
Parliamentary priorities, the motion would not likely be
debated any time soon even if it is filed. Muite may have
been currying political favor by threatening to file the
motion (thus adding Parliamentary cover to the Article 98
opposition) without ever intending to follow through. END
SUMMARY.


2. (U) A June 13 Nation article (reftel) followed by a longer
article in the June 16 Kenya Times reported that Paul Muite,
a Member of Parliament from a small party (SAFINA) that is
part of the NARC coalition, filed a motion of censure against
the U.S. for attempting to coerce an Article 98 agreement in
Kenya. The Times article said the motion read, in part,
"This House expresses its abhorrence to the conduct of the
United States of America in refusing to ratify the
International Criminal Court (The Rome Treaty) and its
attempts to coerce countries to sign the Non-Surrender
Agreement (Article 98) at the risk of curtailment of military
and other economic assistance and calls on the government NOT
to sign the Non-Surrender bilateral Agreement and further
expresses its solidarity with the government and the people
of Kenya on the stand that Kenya's sovereignty and dignity
must come first ahead of military support and aid from any
quarters."


3. (U) The Sunday Standard devoted nearly two pages to three
articles June 19 under the overall caption "Kenya-U.S.
relations on trial." The first sentence of the lead article
said that, by virtue of the Muite motion, relations between
the U.S. and Kenya were headed for "their lowest point since
independence."


4. (C) The Muite motion may, however, be more chimerical than
real. Fred Matiangi, deputy director of a U.S.-funded
Parliamentary strengthening project, told poloff June 21 that
the motion had not yet been filed. He added that, even if it
is filed soon, the House Business Committee, which controls
Parliament's agenda, is not likely to schedule debate on the
motion in the near future because the Committee will give
precedence to government-sponsored legislation over private
members' motions.


5. (C) Some opposition to the motion, moreover, has already
been voiced in Parliament. Nominated KANU MP Mutula Kilonzo
said he opposes the motion because the issue belongs with
government, not Parliament. Kilonzo was quoted in the June
19 Sunday Standard as saying, "I don't agree with the
pressure America is putting on us. But I also don't agree
that Parliament can be used to censure a friendly foreign
country pursuing her right to protect her citizens." Joseph
Nkaissery, a retired general and now a KANU MP and the
party's shadow defense minister, was quoted in the same paper
as saying, "We need America. It controls the World Bank and
the IMF and has weight on other countries. We cannot be
populist on this. Let's leave this to foreign affairs."


6. (C) COMMENT. While the Muite motion may never actually be
filed or debated in Parliament, it has already had the effect
of dragging Parliament, which had hitherto been silent, into
the Article 98 debate. Muite may also have had political and
personal reasons for filing the motion. Muite, who maintains
a private law practice, has been charged in a lawsuit with
stealing money from clients; he may be looking for government
assistance in making these charges disappear. END COMMENT.
ROWE