Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05LIMA4228
2005-09-28 20:23:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Lima
Cable title:  

ANOTHER ATPDEA DISPUTE RESOLVED

Tags:  EINV ECON ETRD PGOV PE 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS LIMA 004228 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR WHA/AND, WHA/EPSC, EB/IFD/OFD, EB/CBA, EB/IFD/OIA
TREASURY FOR OASIA/INL, DO/GCHRISTOPOLUS
COMMERCE FOR 4331/MAC/WH/MCAMERON
USTR FOR BHARMAN/DWEINER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV ECON ETRD PGOV PE
SUBJECT: ANOTHER ATPDEA DISPUTE RESOLVED

REF: A) LIMA 4033 B)LIMA 2017 C) LIMA 995

UNCLAS LIMA 004228

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR WHA/AND, WHA/EPSC, EB/IFD/OFD, EB/CBA, EB/IFD/OIA
TREASURY FOR OASIA/INL, DO/GCHRISTOPOLUS
COMMERCE FOR 4331/MAC/WH/MCAMERON
USTR FOR BHARMAN/DWEINER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV ECON ETRD PGOV PE
SUBJECT: ANOTHER ATPDEA DISPUTE RESOLVED

REF: A) LIMA 4033 B)LIMA 2017 C) LIMA 995


1. (SBU) Summary. The General Manager of Luz del Sur (owned
by New Jersey-based PSEG and Californian Sempra Energy)
informed us that the company's dispute with Peru's tax
authority, SUNAT, is fully resolved. SUNAT determined that
Luz del Sur owed 929,000 soles (approximately $282,000) in
back taxes and interest through 1999. The company gladly
accepted the figure in light of the earlier $73 million tax
liability. SUNAT also agreed not to appeal the Tax Court
decision that prevented the agency from reopening the 1996-
97 tax years. Only three of the original nine ATPDEA
disputes -- Engelhard, Princeton Dover and LeTourneau --
remain. End Summary.

Luz del Sur Pleased With Result
--------------


2. (SBU) In 2001, Peru's tax agency, SUNAT, disputed Luz
del Sur's use of accelerated depreciation to determine tax
liability and argued that the company overvalued its assets
to reduce its tax burden. The issue initially went to both
arbitration and a parallel Tax Court proceeding. Luz del
Sur won in both instances, but SUNAT was permitted to
revisit the case. In July 2003, SUNAT assessed Luz del Sur
with $56 million in back taxes due in 1999 (a figure that
grew to $73 million). Luz del Sur again appealed the SUNAT
assessment to the Tax Court, which ruled in February 2004
that the company had a right to revalue its assets. The Tax
Court directed SUNAT to employ GOP agency CONATA (state-
owned valuation firm) to conduct a new appraisal of Luz del
Sur's assets.


3. (SBU) The Tax Court issued a ruling on July 26 that
accepted the CONATA appraisal of the U.S. company's assets
(Ref B). The Tax Court then instructed SUNAT to use that
valuation to determine any back taxes that Luz del Sur owed.
Mile Cacic, General Manager of Luz del Sur, told EconCouns
on September 26 that SUNAT issued its final assessment of
back taxes owed by the company: 929,000 soles (approximately
$282,000) of which 552,000 soles covered interest and
penalties. On a related issue, Peru's Commercial Dispute
Coordinator Aurelio Loret de Mola informed us that SUNAT
would not appeal a Tax Court ruling that prevented the tax
agency from revisiting the 1996-97 tax years.

Comment
--------------


4. (SBU) With the resolution of the Luz del Sur case, Peru
now has three of the original nine ATPDEA cases to contend
with -- Engelhard, Princeton Dover and LeTourneau. In a
positive development, the GOP prosecutor recommended
dropping the two local Engelhard executives from the large
criminal case involving gold suppliers and exporters. To
his disappointment, Princeton Dover's executive is likely to
be included in the criminal case. The Ambassador plans on
meeting with Loret de Mola shortly to discuss strategies for
resolving the remaining disputes.

STRUBLE