Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05LILONGWE914
2005-10-19 15:31:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Lilongwe
Cable title:  

PARLIAMENT ADOPTS IMPEACHMENT PROCEDURES

Tags:  KDEM PREL PGOV MI 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LILONGWE 000914 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AF/S MELINDA TABLER-STONE
STATE FOR INR/AA
PARIS FOR D'ELIA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/18/2010
TAGS: KDEM PREL PGOV MI
SUBJECT: PARLIAMENT ADOPTS IMPEACHMENT PROCEDURES

REF: A. LILONGWE 634


B. LILONGWE 614

Classified By: PolOff Tyler Sparks for reasons 1.4 b and d.

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LILONGWE 000914

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AF/S MELINDA TABLER-STONE
STATE FOR INR/AA
PARIS FOR D'ELIA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/18/2010
TAGS: KDEM PREL PGOV MI
SUBJECT: PARLIAMENT ADOPTS IMPEACHMENT PROCEDURES

REF: A. LILONGWE 634


B. LILONGWE 614

Classified By: PolOff Tyler Sparks for reasons 1.4 b and d.


1. (SBU) Summary: On October 18, Malawi,s Parliament adopted
procedures which provide the framework for the possible
impeachment of President Mutharika. The opposition's next
step will be to propose a constitutional amendment to
establish a National Governing Council, which would make a
major change in the succession scenario should the
impeachment attempt be successful. That would require a 2/3
majority in parliament and the first true test of the
opposition's strength on the impeachment issue. The
impeachment attempt seems likely to continue to distract
Parliament, even as Malawi moves towards the worst hunger
crisis in the last ten years. Heads of mission discussed a
possible strategy for a quiet effort to encourage the
Malawian parties to reconcile (see para 6). End summary.


2. (C) The adopted impeachment procedures put in place the
framework for impeaching any sitting President or
Vice-President, and only required a simple majority to pass.
From here, however, the task becomes more difficult for the
two opposition parties, the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) and
United Democratic Front (UDF). While the UDF is the main
driver of the impeachment attempt, the MCP is insisting that
a National Governing Council follow any impeachment. In
their minds, this would pave the way for MCP president and
leader of the opposition John Tembo to take over as
President, instead of the Vice-President Cassim Chilumpha, a
member of the UDF. (Note: According to the current
constitutional provisions for impeachment, the vice-president
would serve out the remainder of the term, in this case until

2009. End note.)


3. (C) However, a constitutional amendment establishing a
National Governing Council (NGC) will require a 2/3 majority,
which will not be easy. The MCP has 59 seats and the UDF
roughly 45 seats in the 187 member parliament, which still
puts them over 20 votes short of 2/3. The NGC vote will be
the first real test of the MCP and UDF's combined strength.
An MCP parliamentarian told PolOff that he doesn't think they

will have enough votes to pass the NGC or an impeachment
motion.


4. (SBU) The impeachment motion has been intensely debated in
the press in recent weeks, and civil society organizations
have begun to speak out strongly on the issue. All sides
seem to agree that impeachment procedures should be put in
place as called for by the constitution. However, the Malawi
Law Commission and some civil society organizations have come
out against the procedures adopted by Parliament. They favor
the establishment of an independent tribunal to judge the
merit of charges put forward by Parliament, rather than
Parliament acting as both prosecutor (in bringing an
indictment by a two-thirds vote) and the ultimate "judge" of
an impeachment trial. The opposition has so far ignored
outside advice and has pressed ahead to put in place
procedures that would allow the impeachment of Mutharika
before the end of the year.


5. (C) Comment: There are a good many things wrong with this
picture. First, the political class here has lost sight of
whatever misdeeds Mutharika might have committed, if any, to
deserve impeachment. Thus this discussion is to this point
entirely theoretical and political. Second, the National
Governing Council proposal makes a major change in the
constitutional schema, which at present is an orderly
succession to a single elected official. Should the NGC
proposal be adopted, it would guarantee a succession to an
interim governing body, negotiated behind closed doors
without public debate and composed of a coalition of
opposition figures who are unlikely to be able to govern
effectively, a thoroughly bad idea. Third, it would open the
door to an unbudgeted and expensive election within the
current fiscal year and within the current food crisis,
something that neither we nor the IMF should be excited
about. Finally, we are about to see Malawi politics get as
nasty as we have seen it in the eleven years and some months
since the departure of the Banda dictatorship.


6. (C) Donor heads of mission discussed a possible joint
intervention in their regular monthly meeting October 19. It
was agreed that the UK mission would draft a set of points
with an eye to issuing a statement of concern about the
impact of this fight on Malawi, and the investment the donors
have made in the country in recent years. Prior to issuing
such a statement, however, the donors would deploy it in
draft to key leaders (the government, Tembo, Muluzi, others)
to attempt to get the effect without necessarily intervening
publicly in the debate. The group agreed that it would be
far preferable to encourage a Malawian reconciliation effort
to emerge, noting that the Public Affairs Committee (PAC)
which has played this role in the past, has taken itself out
of the running for mediator in this current crisis. The
South African High Commissioner agreed to raise the question
in the AU group here whether the AU might consider a
political mission or statement of concern, and the European
and US heads of mission urged her to re-visit whether South
Africa might find itself able to urge restraint, reflection,
and reconciliation on the Malawian poltical actors.


7. (C) The saving grace is that while it might be close, it
will be difficult for the opposition parties to get the 2/3
majority they need for either the NGC or impeachment. It
would take surprise defections from the dwindling government
camp to enable a two-thirds majority. And a combined effort
on their part was not enough to get a 2/3 majority on a
separate issue this past July (reftel B). However, while
Parliament focuses on the push for impeachment they
effectively ignore other pressing business, such as the
looming food crisis (in any sense other than slamming the
government for nonfeasance) or a long-delayed anti-money
laundering bill. For its part, government seems to have
little strategy other than to stall the impeachment process
as long as possible. Their hope is that the momentum behind
impeachment will fade with time, and they are very mindful
that Parliament,s current session only has another week and
a half to run. Unfortunately, they were unable to stall the
procedures voted yesterday, and even stalling takes the
government,s full time and effort, to the detriment of other
pressing business.

EASTHAM