Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05LILONGWE338
2005-04-20 13:03:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Lilongwe
Cable title:
MUTHARIKA DEFIANT ON JOURNALISTS' ARREST
how-toThis record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS LILONGWE 000338
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM KPAO MI
SUBJECT: MUTHARIKA DEFIANT ON JOURNALISTS' ARREST
REF: A) Lilongwe 259 B) Lilongwe 333
UNCLAS LILONGWE 000338
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM KPAO MI
SUBJECT: MUTHARIKA DEFIANT ON JOURNALISTS' ARREST
REF: A) Lilongwe 259 B) Lilongwe 333
1. Summary: President Mutharika has defended the recent
arrest of two journalists for publishing stories about
ghosts in the presidential mansion. Although the two were
released on bail after two days, charges of ridiculing the
president have not been dropped and the case remains in the
judicial system. End summary.
2. At a media availability during the April 14 launch of
Mutharika's new political party (ref B),the president told
reporters and the large crowd of supporters that he has not
forgiven journalists Raphael Tenthani and Mabvuto Banda for
publishing stories about ghosts in the presidential mansion
(ref A). The reports were carried on the BBC and wire
services worldwide. Despite earlier accounts that zealous
presidential advisors had ordered the arrests without
specific orders from the president, Mutharika's statements
confirmed that he had agreed with the detentions. A visibly
agitated Mutharika declared that "these people published
lies" that embarrassed the president, and that "they stood
by their lies" even after the story was denied. Mutharika
appears intent on seeing the case to a conclusion, stating
"the matter is now with the courts." He went on to admonish
the journalists present, as he has on previous occasions,
saying that they are not professional and need training that
his government could provide.
3. Comment: While Mutharika frequently claims that he favors
a free press and is open to criticism, this episode
demonstrates that there are limits to press freedom in
Malawi. The print press is generally quite free and the
president is a regular target of critique. In this case,
however, the president clearly was personally offended by
the story, and it appears that these two writers crossed an
indeterminate invisible line that invoked his wrath. The
arrests do not yet constitute a pattern, but they have
certainly caused bitter feelings among journalists here.
For Mutharika, the episode will do nothing to earn the
positive media coverage that he is desperately seeking for
his reform program.
GILMOUR
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM KPAO MI
SUBJECT: MUTHARIKA DEFIANT ON JOURNALISTS' ARREST
REF: A) Lilongwe 259 B) Lilongwe 333
1. Summary: President Mutharika has defended the recent
arrest of two journalists for publishing stories about
ghosts in the presidential mansion. Although the two were
released on bail after two days, charges of ridiculing the
president have not been dropped and the case remains in the
judicial system. End summary.
2. At a media availability during the April 14 launch of
Mutharika's new political party (ref B),the president told
reporters and the large crowd of supporters that he has not
forgiven journalists Raphael Tenthani and Mabvuto Banda for
publishing stories about ghosts in the presidential mansion
(ref A). The reports were carried on the BBC and wire
services worldwide. Despite earlier accounts that zealous
presidential advisors had ordered the arrests without
specific orders from the president, Mutharika's statements
confirmed that he had agreed with the detentions. A visibly
agitated Mutharika declared that "these people published
lies" that embarrassed the president, and that "they stood
by their lies" even after the story was denied. Mutharika
appears intent on seeing the case to a conclusion, stating
"the matter is now with the courts." He went on to admonish
the journalists present, as he has on previous occasions,
saying that they are not professional and need training that
his government could provide.
3. Comment: While Mutharika frequently claims that he favors
a free press and is open to criticism, this episode
demonstrates that there are limits to press freedom in
Malawi. The print press is generally quite free and the
president is a regular target of critique. In this case,
however, the president clearly was personally offended by
the story, and it appears that these two writers crossed an
indeterminate invisible line that invoked his wrath. The
arrests do not yet constitute a pattern, but they have
certainly caused bitter feelings among journalists here.
For Mutharika, the episode will do nothing to earn the
positive media coverage that he is desperately seeking for
his reform program.
GILMOUR