Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05KINSHASA764
2005-05-05 14:49:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kinshasa
Cable title:  

FDLR PRES. PLANNING VISIT TO SOUTH KIVU

Tags:  PGOV PREL KPKO CG 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L KINSHASA 000764 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2015
TAGS: PGOV PREL KPKO CG
SUBJECT: FDLR PRES. PLANNING VISIT TO SOUTH KIVU

REF: KINSHASA 735

Classified By: Poloff Meghan Moore for Reasons 1.4 B and D

C O N F I D E N T I A L KINSHASA 000764

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2015
TAGS: PGOV PREL KPKO CG
SUBJECT: FDLR PRES. PLANNING VISIT TO SOUTH KIVU

REF: KINSHASA 735

Classified By: Poloff Meghan Moore for Reasons 1.4 B and D


1. (C) SUMMARY. FDLR President Dr. Ignace Murwanashyaka is
scheduled to leave Kinshasa for the Kivus in the next few
days to meet with field commanders. Although he called on the
international community to establish a 'Follow Up Committee,'
he did not provide concrete 'next steps' to implement the
San'Egidio brokered plan for the return of FDLR members and
their families to Rwanda, and seemed out of touch with
realities both in eastern Congo and Western capitals. END
SUMMARY.


2. (SBU) During MONUC's weekly press briefing May 4, FDLR
President Dr. Ignace Murwanashyaka called on the
international community, San'Egidio and the governments of
Rwanda and the DRC to help facilitate the FDLR's return to
Rwanda, requested the establishment of a formal 'Follow Up
Committee,' and said the FDLR would not be intimidated by
attempts to 'torpedo' the process. He also condemned
'terrorists' operating in Walungu, called for an
investigation into their behavior, and suggested MONUC attack
them. Journalists did not ask Ambassador Antoine Ghonda, who
sat next to Murwanashyaka throughout the event, any
questions.

Progress?
--------------


3. (SBU) Murwanashyaka defined the FDLR as a
political/military movement established in May 2000 whose
members were too young (25-27) to have participated in the
genocide. He said the FDLR was 'demonized' by 'liars' who
said its members were Interahamwe or ex-FAR or confused them
with other 'terrorist' elements, like Rastas. Murwanashyaka
refused to provide any troop number estimates, and insisted
that the vast majority of FDLR soldiers were
well-disciplined, co-existed peacefully with their Congolese
neighbors, and did not kill or rape. (Note. Although the FDLR
contains many members who did not participate in the
genocide, it also contains a significant number of ex-FAR,
Interahamwe, and is widely considered to be a re-configured
ALIR. The FDLR regularly commits human rights violations. End
note.)


4. (C) The FDLR President said the FDLR's return to Rwanda
had been delayed because a 'Follow Up Committee' had not been
established and it was taking time to contact field
commanders. He planned to travel to the Kivus to meet with
FDLR commanders, and ask troops to remain disciplined.
Murwanashyaka was unable to answer how he would convince FDLR
members to return to Rwanda. After the press conference,
MONUC DDRRR Chief Peter Swarbrick told poloff he would
accompany Murwanashyaka to the Kivus. When pressed, Swarbrick
admitted that although Murwanashyaka may not be a very
credible interlocutor, he was the only option. Swarbrick
added he was being sent with the FDLR President to get a real
sense of whether the San'Egidio brokered plan could get FDLR
members and their families to return to Rwanda before MONUC
starts military action against the FDLR.

Conditions?
--------------


5. (SBU) On the one hand, Murwanashyaka asserted that the
FDLR had renounced violence and did not require special
conditions to return to Rwanda. On the other, he called for
the 'Follow Up Committee,' which he was optimistic would be
established soon, vigorously complained about gacaca, asked
for political space for the FDLR to operate as a political
party, and said Rwandans would not remain victims of a
dictator forever.

Comment
--------------


6. (C) The longer Murwanashyaka spoke, the less credible he
became. Although the Professor may be well-meaning, he spent
the past 14 years in Europe, and did not appear to have a
good sense of what was going on in eastern Congo, a realistic
plan for convincing FDLR members to go home, or an
understanding of larger political realities--most importantly
that the international community is unlikely to establish a
'Follow Up Committee,' or push Rwanda to accept the FDLR as a
political party. That said, we agree with MONUC's assessment
that although flawed, Murwanashyaka is still the best, if not
only, route to try to facilitate a non-military solution to
the FDLR problem.
DOUGHERTY