Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ISTANBUL383
2005-03-08 15:16:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Consulate Istanbul
Cable title:  

ISTANBUL POLICE BRUTALITY DRAWS EU CRITICISM

Tags:  PGOV PHUM TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ISTANBUL 000383 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/08/2015
TAGS: PGOV PHUM TU
SUBJECT: ISTANBUL POLICE BRUTALITY DRAWS EU CRITICISM


Classified By: Consul General David Arnett for Reasons 1.4(b&d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ISTANBUL 000383

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/08/2015
TAGS: PGOV PHUM TU
SUBJECT: ISTANBUL POLICE BRUTALITY DRAWS EU CRITICISM


Classified By: Consul General David Arnett for Reasons 1.4(b&d)


1. (c) Summary: The use of violence by Istanbul police to
break up a demonstration of Turkish women on March 6 prompted
widespread international press coverage and criticism from a
visiting EU Troika delegation. Our human rights contacts
characterized the police response as harsh and unacceptable.
Startling images of the event, aired by local and
international television, have raised questions about
Turkey's commitment to EU reform just months before
membership negotiations are set to open. Some here have even
suggested that the event may have been a deliberate attempt
by the police to sabotage Turkey's own EU bid. Our
experience with the local police and a discussion with one of
our senior police contacts suggest to us that the police
crackdown may, in fact, have been ordered from above. End
Summary.


2. (sbu) Istanbul police used force to break up a March 6
demonstration in the Beyazit neighborhood of central Istanbul
held to mark International Women's Day. The demonstration of
several hundred women was organized by groups including the
Democratic Women's Movement (which appears to be the women's
branch of a nascent Kurdish party with PKK elements),the
Independent Revolutionist Working class Platform, the
Contemporary Jurists Association and the Labor Movement
Party, a radical socialist party. Riot police were captured
on film breaking up the demonstration, beating women
demonstrators with truncheons, and spraying them with tear
and pepper gas.


3. (c) Lerzan Tascier, a board member of the Human Rights
Association, told us that she believed the police
intervention was harsh and unacceptable. "The police were
full of hatred and they acted as if they were unleashed," she
added. She maintained that the demonstration, organized by
radical socialist/left-wing groups, had gathered on a legal
basis to conduct a peaceful rally, and no illegal slogans
were used. All 63 demonstrators detained by the police were
subsequently released by the court. Meanwhile, a separate,
much larger demonstration of 2,000 to 3,000 women organized
by the Union of Women Laborers occurred peacefully on March 6
in the Kadikoy district of Istanbul. We know from experience
that riot police generally cannot use force without direct
orders. The Deputy Police Chief for Counter-Terrorism, whom
we saw at the event on television and who was almost
certainly one of the senior police officials responsible,
professed "no knowledge" of what had transpired and
nonchalantly tried to pass the buck.


4. (u) According to subsequent press reports, Turkish
officials were slow and hesitant to condemn the incident. EU
Enlargement Commissioner Rehn, visiting Turkey as part of an
EU Troika delegation for meetings with the GOT, raised the
issue with FM Gul on March 6. After the meeting, Gul told
the press that the police had to act within the framework of
government regulations, and said the Interior Ministry had
begun the necessary procedures to investigate the incident.
Following public EU criticism of the incident, Gul also
condemned the police action and promised to punish those
responsible for the violence. Justice Minister Cicek
contradicted him, however, noting that "we need to show
understanding to the police."


5. (c) Comment: Unfortunately, the violence employed by
Istanbul police in this incident is far from extraordinary.
A female Reuters correspondent told us, for example, that a
police officer sprayed her face with pepper gas while she was
covering street demonstrations at last year's NATO Summit.
The fact that these demonstrators were women, the violence
was captured on film, and it came just before a major EU
visit all ensured that the event would be publicly condemned.
At least one newspaper, Hurriyet, has already commented that
the violence may have been a deliberate attempt by
disgruntled police to sabotage efforts for Turkey's EU bid.
Given some comments we have heard from the grumbling state
bureaucracy, reports of discontent with some of the
EU-imposed penal code reforms, and the duplicitous answer we
received from our police contacts, we would not rule it out
as a possibility.
ARNETT