Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ISTANBUL2134
2005-12-16 15:50:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Istanbul
Cable title:  

PAMUK TRIAL POSTPONED PENDING JUSTICE MINISTRY

Tags:  PHUM PGOV TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ISTANBUL 002134 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV TU
SUBJECT: PAMUK TRIAL POSTPONED PENDING JUSTICE MINISTRY
GUIDANCE

REF: A. ANKARA 7242


B. ANKARA 7219

C. ISTANBUL 2020

D. ANKARA 6930

E. ANKARA 6229

F. ISTANBUL 1780

UNCLAS ISTANBUL 002134

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV TU
SUBJECT: PAMUK TRIAL POSTPONED PENDING JUSTICE MINISTRY
GUIDANCE

REF: A. ANKARA 7242


B. ANKARA 7219

C. ISTANBUL 2020

D. ANKARA 6930

E. ANKARA 6229

F. ISTANBUL 1780


1. (SBU) Summary: In an unsurprising move, the judge
presiding at the initial hearing in Istanbul,s Sisli
District courthouse for Orhan Pamuk,s trial on charges of
insulting the Turkish state decided to delay action on the
case pending Justice Ministry review of possible "procedural
flaws." The move places the case squarely in the political
realm, with the Ministry expected to render its ruling by
February 7, 2006. In contrast to the court,s bland
bureaucratic maneuver, heavy security and scuffles both
inside and outside the courthouse provided observers with
ample atmospherics. End Summary.

--------------
When in Doubt, Delay
--------------


2. (U) The trial of renowned novelist Orhan Pamuk in
Istanbul,s Sisli District courthouse on December 16
demonstrated the power of the Turkish state to turn a
dramatic occasion into a tedious exercise in bureaucracy.
Amid tight security (at least 50 municipal police in body
armor) and several hundred observers, including international
human rights group representatives, journalists from around
the globe, EU parliamentarians, and diplomats, the
prosecution of Pamuk under Penal Code Article 301 ("publicly
insulting and vilifying the Turkish identity") stalled almost
as soon as it began with Pamuk,s entry into the hearing
room. After listening to prosecution and defense lawyers
argue the facts for about 20 minutes, the presiding judge
demurred, ruling that possible "procedural flaws"
necessitating a decision from the Justice Ministry meant he
had no choice but to delay action on the case. The
courthouse began to empty at 1130 after news of the judge,s
decision leaked out to those cramming the dim, cacophonous,
smoke-filled hallway outside the hearing room.

--------------
What a Difference a Day Makes
--------------


3. (SBU) Outside, approximately 50 ultra-nationalist
protesters stood behind red-and-white banners and a phalanx
of police across the street. Some waved Turkish flags, some
blew whistles, while the rest shouted slogans including
"Pamuk, love (Turkey) or leave it" and "Pamuk will pay the
price." We buttonholed a British official who had witnessed
the proceedings to learn what went on in the hearing room.
According to Liberal MP Andrew Duff, Pamuk did not utter a
word. The lawyers argued, the judge ordered a delay, and
that was that. Duff added that he was not impressed by the
quality of Turkey,s lawyers, opining that it likely would be
some years yet before they achieved a professional standard
in line with that of the EU member states.


4. (U) Owing to the pandemonium, Pamuk himself was unable to
leave the courthouse until 1230. Beneath a shower of
epithets and eggs, and amid the flash of countless cameras,
he was hustled by police into a waiting minivan.

--------------
Comment
--------------


5. (SBU) It has been widely expected here that the Sisli
court would find a way to delay Pamuk,s trial. They chose
to do so by putting the decision squarely in the hands of
Justice Minister Cemil Cicek, and insisting that under
Turkey's former penal code, Ministry clearance is required
before a prosecution can go forward. Cicek has indicated
that he will make a decision, but claimed he has not yet
received the court's petition. The EU, for its part, has
made clear that it is watching closely: "Turkey, not Orhan
Pamuk, is on trial here," Enlargement Commissioner Ollie Rehn
declared on December 15, in comments that received wide play
here. What is unclear is whether such international pressure
and attention will reinforce nationalist impulses here, or
achieve the desired result. End Comment.

JONES