Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ISTANBUL147
2005-01-28 17:43:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Consulate Istanbul
Cable title:  

INTERNECINE WARFARE THREATENS TO SPLIT OPPOSITION

Tags:  PGOV PREL TU POLITICAL PARTIES 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ISTANBUL 000147 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/28/2015
TAGS: PGOV PREL TU POLITICAL PARTIES
SUBJECT: INTERNECINE WARFARE THREATENS TO SPLIT OPPOSITION
CHP: THE VIEW FROM ISTANBUL

REF: A. ANKARA 198


B. 04 ISTANBUL 1729

Classified By: Consul General David Arnett for Reasons 1.4(b&d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ISTANBUL 000147

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/28/2015
TAGS: PGOV PREL TU POLITICAL PARTIES
SUBJECT: INTERNECINE WARFARE THREATENS TO SPLIT OPPOSITION
CHP: THE VIEW FROM ISTANBUL

REF: A. ANKARA 198


B. 04 ISTANBUL 1729

Classified By: Consul General David Arnett for Reasons 1.4(b&d)


1. (sbu) Summary: Republican People's Party (CHP) Chairman
Deniz Baykal and Sisli Mayor Mustafa Sarigul are set for a
collision course at the upcoming January 29-30 party
congress. Efforts by Istanbul MP Zulfu Livaneli and CHP
delegate Hursit Gunes to present themselves as compromise
candidates have faltered, and other Istanbul CHP contacts are
pessimistic about the party's prospects. With the opposition
fragmented and unwilling to coalesce around Sarigul, Baykal
appears to have the upper hand, our contacts say. But his
victory will come at the cost of a further degradation of the
chief opposition to ruling AJustice and Development Party
(AKP),leaving AKP to become ever more over-confident than it
already is. End Summary.


2. (sbu) The power struggle between CHP Chairman Deniz Baykal
and Sisli Mayor Mustafa Sarigul and the accusations tossed
back and forth by their supporters have exposed even more CHP
dirty laundry over the last several weeks. Long-suppressed
opposition to Baykal's leadership style and opposition
strategy, frustration with corruption and drift from CHP's
social democratic roots, and personal ambition on the part of
assorted party members have all come to the surface.
Moreover, because new party rules require candidates for
party chairman to secure signatures from 20 percent (up from
5 percent) of the 1300 some-odd delegates, the campaigns by
Sarigul, Livaneli, and Baykal are exacerbating divisions by
forcing delegates to declare their allegiances more openly.

Views From Istanbul Insiders
--------------

3. (c) Damla Gurel, an Istanbul MP close to former Economy
Minister Kemal Dervis, asserted to poloff that she doesn't
support any of the declared candidates, sees little chance
that a consensus opposition candidate will emerge, and
believes the party's situation is "hopeless." Gurel
dismissed Hursit Gunes as a serious contender and noted that
Livaneli is widely considered to be an aloof intellectual
with little party experience. Gurel added that some have
also questioned his close relationship with Baykal confidante

and MP Bulent Tanla (Note: She subsequently signed a
petition, along with Dervis, supporting Livaneli's candidacy.
End Note). As for Sarigul, Gurel said she cannot bring
herself to support a man who offers nothing more than naked
ambition. Remarking that Sarigul had made overtures to
Dervis in meetings with her, Gurel said that Dervis had
refused to meet with him. Looking forward to the congress,
Gurel gave Baykal a slight advantage over Sarigul, but noted
that several factors, including the candidates' speeches and
their decisions on whether to put forward bloc or open lists
for the party board, could be decisive.


4. (c) Former Istanbul CHP Chairman Mehmet Boluk, an
outspoken critic of Deniz Baykal, told poloff that the party
is in a "terrible situation," predicting that Baykal would
turn back Sarigul's challenge easily in a head-to-head
contest. Consequently, he has worked closely with other
party insiders to identify a third "consensus" candidate
(probably Hasan Fehmi Gunes) and to convince Sarigul to
withdraw his nomination. Boluk claimed to be working closely
with former CHP Chairman Altan Oymen, former CHP SecGen
Ertugrul Gunay, and MPs Abdulkadir Ates, Hasan Fehmi Gunes,
and others. According to Boluk, Ates has led the
negotiations with Sarigul and has reported that while Sarigul
is prepared to accept a consensus candidate, some of his
supporters are still pushing him to challenge Baykal
directly. Boluk predicted that Sarigul would eventually back
down (Note: Sarigul declared his candidacy on January 27. End
Note). Like Gurel, Boluk said the congress speeches would be
important, but that the "open vote" format will favor Baykal.
Whichever candidate wins, Boluk predicted that the party
will split.


5. (c) Particularly downbeat about the party's prospects,
former CHP Secretary General and Radikal columnist Tarhan
Erdem noted that Baykal is merely the result (not the cause)
of a party that has been gradually "hollowed out" over the
last 30 years. Drawing from his personal efforts to reform
the party in 1999-2000, Erdem concluded that CHP cannot be
reformed from within and that the only ideological division
remaining for party members is whether or not one supports
Baykal. Although skeptical of Sarigul's moral character and
political platform, Erdem has been favorably impressed by the
new "dynamic" that he has introduced into the debate by means
of what Erdem calls Sarigul's gifted organization and people
skills. Erdem dismissed critics who accuse Sarigul of
"buying" support and cited examples of old party friends who
had been inspired to volunteer to help Sarigul. Erdem
predicted that Livaneli's January 28 decision to withdraw
would work to Baykal's favor (i.e., Livaneli would have
attracted many of Baykal's supporters) and forecast a narrow,
but by no means assured, Baykal victory. Agreeing with
Boluk, Erdem expected the party to split following the
congress.

CHP Anti-American Rhetoric
--------------

6. (c) Gurel was sharply critical of recent anti-American
remarks made by Dervis and other CHP figures and told poloff
that Baykal confidante and MP Attila Emek had been
circulating a paper among MPs and delegates that made
spurious charges slandering and linking Dervis, Hursit Gunes,
Sarigul, and the United States. Boluk, who had also received
the paper, characterized it as a shallow attempt to fling mud
on Baykal's opponents (Comment: and the U.S. End Comment).
Erdem dismissed such remarks as cheap attempts to curry votes
among the "ignorant, nationalistic" elements of the party.

Comment
--------------

7. (c) Prompted by the personal rivalry between Baykal and
Sarigul, it is clear from Istanbul that the CHP crisis that
will come to a head at the January 29 congress represents a
decisive moment for the party. Efforts among the Baykal
opposition to identify a consensus candidate appear to have
failed and may force many to choose what they see as the
'lesser of evils,' setting the stage for one or more groups
to break away from the party. Absent an (unlikely)
last-minute compromise on a candidate who could hold the
party together and pave the way for meaningful reform, we
think the CHP that emerges from the upcoming congress will be
weak, divided, and no real political threat to the ruling
AKP, whose image has certainly not been hurt by the CHP
infighting. False intimations of USG support (by Sarigul)
and anti-American insinuations (by Baykal's supporters) are
short-sighted attempts to score points and suggest that CHP
will continue to place short-term political gains ahead of
improved U.S.-Turkish relations.
ARNETT