Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05HOCHIMINHCITY561
2005-05-26 12:14:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Cable title:  

INTERVENTION NEEDED TO SAVE JETWAYS DEAL IN VIETNAM

Tags:  ETRD BEXP BTIO EAID PREL VM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

261214Z May 05

ACTION EAP-00 

INFO LOG-00 NP-00 AID-00 CA-00 CIAE-00 CTME-00 INL-00 
 DODE-00 ITCE-00 DS-00 EB-00 EXME-00 EUR-00 E-00 
 FBIE-00 UTED-00 VC-00 FRB-00 H-00 TEDE-00 INR-00 
 LAB-01 VCE-00 AC-00 NSAE-00 OES-00 OMB-00 OPIC-01 
 GIWI-00 ACE-00 SGAC-00 SP-00 IRM-00 SSO-00 STR-00 
 TRSE-00 EVR-00 FMP-00 BBG-00 IIP-00 DSCC-00 PRM-00 
 DRL-00 G-00 NFAT-00 SAS-00 SWCI-00 /002W
 ------------------F5954D 261123Z /38 
FM AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH CITY
TO SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1542
USDOC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
INFO AMEMBASSY HANOI PRIORITY 
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC PRIORITY
NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY TOKYO 
AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
UNCLAS HO CHI MINH CITY 000561 

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

DEPARTMENT PASS EXIM BANK AND OPIC
DEPARTMENT PASS USTR, ELENA BRYAN
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV AND EB/TPP/ABT/BTT
USDOC FOR 4430/MAC/ASIA/OPB/VLC/HPPHO
USDOC FOR ADVOCACY CENTER
PARIS FOR USOECD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD BEXP BTIO EAID PREL VM
SUBJECT: INTERVENTION NEEDED TO SAVE JETWAYS DEAL IN VIETNAM

REF: Ho Chi Minh City 000529

UNCLAS HO CHI MINH CITY 000561

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

DEPARTMENT PASS EXIM BANK AND OPIC
DEPARTMENT PASS USTR, ELENA BRYAN
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV AND EB/TPP/ABT/BTT
USDOC FOR 4430/MAC/ASIA/OPB/VLC/HPPHO
USDOC FOR ADVOCACY CENTER
PARIS FOR USOECD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD BEXP BTIO EAID PREL VM
SUBJECT: INTERVENTION NEEDED TO SAVE JETWAYS DEAL IN VIETNAM

REF: Ho Chi Minh City 000529


1. (U) This is an action request for State and DOC. Urgent
intervention is needed with Japanese agencies in Washington to
ensure a US supplier does not get ODA'd out of USD 4.6 million
sale with considerable follow-on potential.


2. (SBU) Summary: Over the past days, State and Commercial
Service officers in Vietnam and Tokyo have held a series meetings
with Japanese and Vietnamese officials to try and prevent the loss
of the $4.6 million contract for the supply of passenger boarding
bridges (PBBs) manufactured by FMC Jetway Corp. (see reftel).
Discussions focused on the requirements specifying the use of FMC
PBBs in the contract between the Japanese contractor, KTOM, and
the Southern Airports Authority (SAA). Time is running short with
SAA under pressure to accept the substitute product or take blame
for delaying the high profile project. We need to exert all
available pressure now, including in Washington to get JBIC and
KTOM to live up to the terms of the contract with SAA. End
Summary


3. (SBU) On May 25, State and Commerce officers met with JBIC
officals in Tokyo and Hanoi to discuss this case. JBIC Tokyo
declined to intervene in this matter, but did threaten that future
cooperation with USAID HIV/AIDS programs in Vietnam could be
jeopardized if the USG presses too hard on this issue. JBIC Hanoi
officials took a different tack, suggesting that FMC was not
mentioned in the prequalification tender documents. Embassy
officials pointed out that this was irrelevant since the final
signed contract calls for the use of FMC equipment. When asked
what would JBIC's position be if KTOM was found to be in breach of
contract on this matter the JBIC official responded that JBIC
would have to take some action, but did not elaborate.


4. (SBU) Embassy officials in Hanoi also reminded JBIC officials
of a March 2005 letter sent by SAA to KTOM stating that a change
in suppliers of the kind sought by KTOM could constitute a
violation of Vietnamese law. According to SAA's letter, given
that the signed contract was approved by relevant Vietnamese
Government agencies, KTOM and SAA do not have the authority to
revise the contract and such revisions could be considered
illegal. Emboffs said they would expect JBIC to be concerned if
one of their projects involved a breach of contract and possibly
even a violation of Vietnamese law.


5. (SBU) Consul General and PCO met with SAA officials in HCMC on
May 26 to review the actions we have taken on behalf of FMC and
SAA. The SAA project management director told us that he was
under pressure from Hanoi to keep this project on schedule, and
that that if this dispute over the sourcing of PBBs delayed the
project he would be held responsible. He told us that the ball is
in our court, and asked us to do whatever we can to convince JBIC
and KTOM to accept the FMC PBBs.


6. (SBU) We have received a copy of the key portions of the
contract between KTOM and SAA which clearly specify in detail that
FMC PBBs are to be supplied by KTOM. It is now time for
Washington to weigh in with JBIC and the Japanese Embassy. With
the clear evidence in the contract that FMC equipment was agreed
upon by KTOM and that they then pulled a "bait-and-switch" by
changing to Shinmaywa PBBs, we should urge JBIC to honor the
original contract terms. To the extent that there is a real issue
with the 50% Japanese content requirement, they should pursue
another option that does not involve breaching their commitments
to SAA on procurement involving less that 2 percent of the total
contract.

WINNICK


NNNN