Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05HANOI1
2005-01-03 00:03:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Hanoi
Cable title:  

Vietnam: Textile Corruption and Allocation Update

Tags:  KTEX ECON VM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HANOI 000001 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE PASS USTR FOR DSPOONER/CMILLER/EBRYAN
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV AND EB/TPP/ABT/BTT
USDOC FOR OTEXA
BANGKOK FOR CUSTOMS ATTACHE
USDOC ALSO FOR 4431/MAC/AP/OPB/VLC/HPPHO
TREASURY FOR OASIA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KTEX ECON VM
SUBJECT: Vietnam: Textile Corruption and Allocation Update

REF: (A) Hanoi 2620 (B) Hanoi 2752 C) HCMC 1246

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HANOI 000001

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE PASS USTR FOR DSPOONER/CMILLER/EBRYAN
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV AND EB/TPP/ABT/BTT
USDOC FOR OTEXA
BANGKOK FOR CUSTOMS ATTACHE
USDOC ALSO FOR 4431/MAC/AP/OPB/VLC/HPPHO
TREASURY FOR OASIA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KTEX ECON VM
SUBJECT: Vietnam: Textile Corruption and Allocation Update

REF: (A) Hanoi 2620 (B) Hanoi 2752 C) HCMC 1246


1. (U) This is a Hanoi - Ho Chi Minh City joint reporting
cable.


2. (SBU) Summary: Since September, six Ministry of Trade
officials, including a former Vice Minister, have been
arrested for participation in a scheme to extract bribes in
exchange for U.S. textile quota. After a short delay, the
GVN began allocating 2005 quota in October in what one buyer
termed "the most transparent allocation to date" in Vietnam.
Despite problems with corruption and the fact that
Vietnamese textile/apparel exports to the United States will
remain under quota in 2005, U.S. buyers appear committed to
sourcing textiles and apparel in Vietnam in the short run.
End Summary.


3. (SBU) Since September, a total of sixteen people have
been arrested in association with the quota textile
corruption scandal (see reftels),including Mai Van Dau, a
former Vice Minister of Trade, his son and four other MOT
officials. Vice Minister Dau was arrested on November 18 on
charges of "abuse of power." (Note: The Vice Minister has
not worked on textile quotas since his son's arrest on
September 30. End Note.) The GVN's investigation into the
case is ongoing and trial dates have not been set. Under
Vietnamese criminal law, officials charged with "serious
offenses" can be held for up to three months, with the
possibility of up to seven additional months of detainment
before trial.


4. (SBU) The corruption case initially delayed the
allocation of the first tranche of textile/apparel quota for

2005. Allocation was supposed to take place in early
September, but the GVN postponed allocation until mid
October. The GVN plans to allocate the final tranche by the
end of January. For 2005 quota, the GVN increased the
amount of quota allocated based on the "past performance" of
factories from 75 percent to 80 percent. U.S. buyers had
lobbied unsuccessfully for allocation based entirely on past
performance. MOT maintains it needs to reserve some quota
for development purposes. The remaining 20 percent of quota
is allocated to: factories that use local materials (three
percent),exporters of non-quota textiles to the United

States (three percent),remote enterprises (one percent),
enterprises invested in weaving and dying mills (four
percent),and enterprises with contracts with large U.S.
companies (seven percent). (Note: This final category is
for factories which supply U.S. buyers that purchase more
than USD 20 million in textiles/apparel from Vietnam
annually. End Note.)


5. (SBU) For U.S. textile/apparel buyers, the corruption
scandal has both positively and negatively impacted their
operations in Vietnam. Sine September, MOT has made efforts
to increase the transparency of the quota allocation
process. MOT began putting a great deal of information
related to allocation directly onto its website, allowing
the industry to get a clear picture of each factory's
capacity, the amount of quota requested and the amount of
quota allocated. MOT also set up a question and answer page
on its website to provide answers to questions from the
industry. One U.S. buyer resident in HCMC told Ambassador
December 11 that allocation of 2005 quota has been the "most
transparent allocation to date" in Vietnam.


6. (U) In October, MOT issued two notices on textile quota
allocation. The first provided information on the remaining
2004 quota and how MOT would carry out supplemental
allocations. The second notice detailed the procedures for
allocation of 2005 quota, listed the companies that would be
allocated quota in the first tranche, and instructed
companies to deliver quota-related documents to MOT by
courier rather than in person. The second notice also
identified local companies that were suspected of
transshipping textiles/apparel or had been close based on
the August 2004 visit of a U.S. Customs Textile Production
Verification Team (TVPT) visit to Vietnam.


7. (SBU) On the other hand, the corruption scandal has also
created difficulties for U.S. buyers. In an effort to
minimize opportunities for corruption, the Minister of Trade
issued strict new regulations governing contact between
businesses and MOT officials. This has limited
opportunities for U.S. industry representatives to meet with
MOT officials in the last several months. (Note: since
conclusion of the bilateral textile agreement in early 2003,
representatives of the Amcham Textile Subcommittee have met
regularly with MOT officials to discuss issues related to
textile allocation. These meetings often resulted n
positive modifications to the allocation process. End
Note.) Additionally, MOT now prohibits the transfer of quota
(both 2004 and 2005) between factories, decreasing the
allocation system's flexibility and making it more difficult
for buyers to source goods. According to the HCMC Amcham
Textile Subcommittee, lack of transferability of quota has
contributed to low fill rates in several key categories.


8. (SBU) The allocation problems and the fact that Vietnam
will remain subject to textile quotas for export to the U.S.
market in 2005 has apparently not impacted U.S. buyers
commitment to Vietnam as yet. U.S. companies continue to
view sourcing in Vietnam as a strong alternative or balance
to sourcing in China. One buyer (whose company exported
about USD 150 million worth of garments and apparel in 2004)
told the Ambassador that her company sources more than
twenty percent of its production in Vietnam and plans to
expand its business in 2005. She noted that costs of
production of textiles/apparel in Vietnam rival China and
Vietnamese workers generally produce a higher quality
product. She also said that uncertainties about the use of
safeguards against China in 2005 are creating an added
incentive for U.S. buyers to stick with Vietnam, at least in
the short run. Another U.S. buyer (whose company exported
about USD 50 million in textiles/apparel from Vietnam in
2004) told Econoff his company is in Vietnam "for the long
haul" even if Vietnam's target of accession to the WTO in
2005 slips.

BOARDMAN.