Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05GUATEMALA2250
2005-09-23 17:53:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Guatemala
Cable title:  

Energy producers worried about energy sector

Tags:  ENRG EINV BEXP ETRD SENV GT 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

231753Z Sep 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GUATEMALA 002250 

SIPDIS

DEPT PASS USTR

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG EINV BEXP ETRD SENV GT
SUBJECT: Energy producers worried about energy sector
investment climate


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GUATEMALA 002250

SIPDIS

DEPT PASS USTR

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG EINV BEXP ETRD SENV GT
SUBJECT: Energy producers worried about energy sector
investment climate



1. (SBU) Summary: In early September, a delegation of energy
producers, including three US firms, complained to the Embassy
that their contracts are under threat by the regulator, which
claims their prices are too high. They fear legislation that
would give the regulator a hand in setting prices, and decried
a skewed subsidy structure. In addition, some new energy
investments could be stalled or made more expensive by a
system of consultation with local communities. Government
officials (the Economy Minister and Deputy Competition
Commissioner) do not agree with the producers' complaints, and
appeared more concerned with the popular unrest high
electricity prices could cause. On CAFTA, producers hope for
economic growth that will raise consumption, but wondered
whether small producers would be able to compete in a more
open market. End summary


2. (U) Background: Although the energy sector in Guatemala
is stable, there are significant challenges ahead. Energy
producers and the government fear a crisis in the near future
if there are no significant new investments and if energy
prices keep rising. Several small projects are in the
planning phase but no active major projects. Future
investment hinges as much on new investment opportunities as a
commitment by the GOG to transparency and honoring contracts.
The current administration has demonstrated a willingness to
improve the investment climate, and has made attracting new
infrastructure-related investment one of its priorities. The
Embassy has supported this by inviting teams from Treasury,
TDA and other USG agencies to help the GOG improve the laws
and regulations that govern the energy sector and improve
Guatemala's investment climate.


3. (U) There are three types of energy production facilities
in Guatemala: traditional oil-fired power plants; co-
generation plants using sugar cane by-products, and
hydroelectric plants. During the rainy season, May to
October, 58% of production is hydroelectric and 42% is oil
fired. In the drier season, supply is 35% hydroelectric and
65% oil-fired. The sector is regulated by the National
Commission for Electric Energy.



4. (SBU) The price of energy is distorted by government
subsidies. Consumers are subsidized by a system that charges
more to those who use a monthly average above 300 kilowatts.
Critics, such as the National Association of Generators (see
below) argue that a subsidy to consumers based on wattage use
and not economic need places a burden on the 10% of high-
wattage users, who in effect subsidize all other residential
users. Generators see this subsidy scheme as a political tool
to placate the indigenous and rural poor.


5. (SBU) On September 7, a twelve-person delegation from the
National Association of Generators, which lobbies on behalf of
energy producers, came to the Embassy to complain about
developments in the sector. Aside from the lopsided
government subsidy structure, they claimed that the regulator
is threatening to rescind contracts if producers do not lower
prices to the electricity distributors and ultimately to
consumers. Legislation has been introduced that could give
the regulator some control over the prices the generators are
allowed to charge, while not regulating their input costs.
The association president returned on September 21 with a
letter from the regulator to one of the energy distributors,
which all but asked the firm to cancel the contract with its
supplier - in this case a majority US-owned firm - if the
latter would not lower its price. A major concern of the
association is that not honoring contracts will send a very
negative signal to potential energy sector investors, which
could be particularly dangerous in a time of rising energy
prices. A worst-case scenario would be severe energy
shortages, which could lead to popular unrest.


6. (SBU) Some see this new development as merely a tactic to
bring the power generators to the negotiation table.
Association members reluctantly admit that their current rate
of compensation is higher than the international median.
However, they have different ideas on how to correct this than
the regulator, which is taking a hard, somewhat populist line.
On behalf of the US firms in the association, Emboffs brought
this matter up with the Minister of Economy and the Deputy
Competitiveness Commissioner. They confirmed that the
contracts to the producers are generous, with the latter
adding that it is probably positive that the regulator is
becoming more forceful. (Note: There are three major
generators that are majority US-owned: Duke Energy, Prisma
Energy, and Teco Power Services. Prisma Energy is backed
largely by an OPIC loan. They are concerned that unfair
tactics by regulators may force them to accept new rates while
excluding domestic providers with similar contracts. End
note).


7. (SBU) A small hydroelectric project, Rio Hondo, also US-
owned, has faced a different problem. As a new investment, it
had problems getting started due to a provision in the law
known as a "consulta" (consultation). This provision allows
the local community to have a voice in approving area
investments so that they do not have negative social, economic
or environmental impact. Critics see consultas as a means for
local communities to "black mail" investors. Companies have
been threatened with consultas unless they provide significant
local investment and infrastructure. So far no project has
been stopped because of a consulta. However, they have at
times presented a direct challenge to the authority of the
national government. The constitutional courts are actively
working to resolve this issue while attempting to preserve the
ideals of participatory democracy on which consultas are
based.

Energy sector views on CAFTA
--------------

8. (SBU) The energy producers we met with generally view
CAFTA as positive, since the economic growth it will generate
should lead to higher energy consumption. They hope for a
better investment climate, but as large multinational
companies, they have already been successful in establishing
themselves, in spite of the - in their view - not totally
auspicious environment. They theorized that smaller companies
could be hurt by CAFTA, since it will attract additional
investment and competition, for which they may not be ready.

Wharton