Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05GENEVA1320
2005-05-31 12:52:00
UNCLASSIFIED
US Mission Geneva
Cable title:  

MEETING OF THE WTO GENERAL COUNCIL - MAY 26, 2005

Tags:  ETRD WTRO USTR 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 GENEVA 001320 

SIPDIS

PASS USTR FOR ALLGEIER AND DWOSKIN
EB/OT FOR CRAFT
USDA FOR FAS/ITP/SHEIKH, MTND/HENKE
USDOC FOR ITA/JACOBS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD WTRO USTR
SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE WTO GENERAL COUNCIL - MAY 26, 2005

SUMMARY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 GENEVA 001320

SIPDIS

PASS USTR FOR ALLGEIER AND DWOSKIN
EB/OT FOR CRAFT
USDA FOR FAS/ITP/SHEIKH, MTND/HENKE
USDOC FOR ITA/JACOBS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD WTRO USTR
SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE WTO GENERAL COUNCIL - MAY 26, 2005

SUMMARY


1. Begin Summary. The meeting of the WTO General Council on
May 26, 2005 was punctuated by two significant decisions - 1)
a decision to create a working party on the accession of Iran
to the WTO, and 2) formal approval of Pascal Lamy to be the
next WTO Director-General. Lamy's term will be for four years
and begin on September 1, 2005.


2. In his capacity as TNC chair, WTO Director-General
Supachai provided a status report on the Doha Development
Agenda, but he did not add to the statement he made at the May
19 meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee, and the few
interventions made from the floor were predictable comments
about addressing the "development dimension." Many
delegations from small economies spoke up to support the
proponents of the small economies work program, who signaled
that they will be submitting proposals to address their needs
to the Doha negotiating groups. Within the context of work on
outstanding "implementation-related issues," many Members
called for results on the issues surrounding the relationship
between TRIPS and the Convention of Bio-diversity. The
TRIPS/Public Health discussion elicited comments from some
Members including Zambia, Botswana, Uganda, and Kenya on the
urgency of completing work on this issue, but the United
States, Canada, Norway, and Switzerland spoke up to balance
the discussion and underscore that a solution is already in
place and is not time-limited - the only question is
clarifying the legal form of the agreement.


3. Other issues included the non-recognition of rights under
Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII, where Honduras and
Guatemala made lengthy arguments justifying their claim for
substantial supplying interest in negotiations with the EC; a
report from the Joint Advisory Group on the International
Trade Center, with several Members noting the upcoming
departure of Executive Director Belisle and his senior
management team; planning for the Sixth WTO Ministerial
Conference, including processes for the accreditation of
observers and the appointment of officers; and establishment
of a working party for the accession of Sao Tome and Principe.
Under other business, Ambassador Deily made a farewell

statement, sharing personal observations about her experience
in Geneva, the importance of the work, and the talent and
commitment of participants. The chair closed the meeting
graciously, thanking Ambassador Deily for her personal
friendship, her professional leadership, and for demonstrating
that power and responsibility go hand in hand.


4. The next meeting of the General Council is scheduled for
July 27-29, 2005. End Summary.

ACCESSION OF IRAN


5. General Council Chair Amina Mohamed reported that she had
held informal consultations on 25 May with interested
delegations and there appeared to be a consensus in favor of
the establishment of a Working Party, with standard terms of
reference, to develop a working party report and protocol of
accession, pursuant to Article XII of the Marrakech Agreement.
The General Council agreed to establish the Working Party,
without any debate.


6. The Ambassador of Iran to the United Nations, Mohammad
Reza Alborzi, made a very brief statement, observing that the
decision was long overdue and corrected a wrong that dated
from Iran's application to the WTO, which had been made in

1996. Iran has extensive trade ties with almost all WTO
Members, and has managed to maintain its momentum at home,
despite repeated disappointments at the WTO. He concluded by
expressing appreciation to the groups that worked on its
behalf and in support of the principle of "universality."


7. Paraguay, speaking on behalf of the Informal Group of
Developing Countries, was the only member to intervene.
Paraguay said the group was pleased with the result and
expressed appreciation for the decision taken by the United
States. It was good for the WTO to overcome finally an
obstacle that had been damaging to the image of the World
Trade Organization. The WTO should focus on technical and
economic elements affecting international trade, and political
issues not related to trade should be excluded. The WTO
should not experience again a situation where a country is
frustrated in its request for membership for reasons other
than trade.

ACCESSION OF
SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE


8. The General Council also agreed to the establishment of a
Working Party for the accession of Sao Tome and Principe. The
Sao Tome Minister of Commerce, Industry and Tourism gave a
short speech describing his country, a least-developed country
with about a $65 per capita income, and its economic
situation. Cocoa accounts for over 90 percent of exports,
although oil was recently discovered offshore. The minister
cited several challenges confronting his island country,
notably the absence of a deep water port and poor
infrastructure, particularly for road and airport transport.
No requests were made for special treatment in the accession
process by the minister, apart from a call for capacity
building assistance.


9. Angola, Chinese Taipei, Brazil, Rwanda (on behalf of the
Africa Group),Benin (on behalf of the ACP Group) and Zambia
(on behalf of the LDC Group) appreciated the decision to
establish the accession working party and called for speedy
progress. They recalled the December 2002 Declaration on LDC
Accessions, which provides for simplified accession
procedures, special and differential treatment, including
transition periods, and trade-related technical assistance and
capacity building.

REPORT OF JOINT ADVISORY GROUP
ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTER


10. The Chairman of the Committee on Trade and Development
reported that there had been a CTD meeting on 11 May 2005 to
receive the report of the chairman of the International Trade
Center (ITC) joint advisory group (JAG). The CTD Chairman had
a favorable report of the work of the ITC in 2004 and the
challenges for the future, which include replacing the ITC's
senior executives, not overstretching human resources, better
using existing resources, and managing growth to meet demands.
A final evaluative report of the ITC, to be issued in June or
July, will be discussed at the JAG in July 2005. The CTD
Chairman expressed appreciation to several WTO members for
their financial contributions.


11. Switzerland, Canada and Mexico expressed appreciation to
ITC Executive Director Belisle. Pakistan, Djibouti, El
Salvador, Costa Rica, Benin (on behalf of ACP countries),
Guatemala, Rwanda (on behalf of Africa Group),Kyrgyz
Republic, Jamaica, Cuba and Mauritania expressed appreciation
to Executive Director Belisle, the ITC and its donors, for the
assistance provided to them.

REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE TRADE NEGOTATIONS COMMITTEE


12. In his capacity as Chairman of the Trade Negotiations
Committee, Director General Supachai Panitchpakdi said there
had been two formal TNC meetings and one informal heads of
delegation meeting since the February meeting of the General
Council, and reread his report for the 19 May 2005 TNC
meeting. (Note: See Geneva 1257, 23 May 2005, for summary of
report.) The next meeting of the TNC has not been scheduled,
in order to use the period prior to July for informal
consultations. Supachai feels the WTO is behind where it
needs to be, in order to assess in July whether it is on track
to use the Hong Kong Ministerial to set the stage for the
conclusion of the negotiations in 2006.


13. Rwanda (on behalf of Africa),Djibouti, the Philippines
noted the need to address the "development dimension," with
Kenya adding that the TNC Chairman should use the same
approach as he had used for services (writing letters to
ministers to submit initial offers),for advancing work on
development. Benin (on behalf of ACP) and Zambia (on behalf
of LDC Group) referred to their statements at the TNC meeting.
Australia reported that it was the second Member to submit a
revised offer (Canada submitted its revised offer last week).
Australia said the offer included improvements for the
temporary movement in business services for contractual
suppliers and independent professionals, in addition to
improvements to commitments for several sectors.


14. The General Council Chairman referred to the report from
New Zealand advising that Tim Groser had stepped down as
ambassador. She welcomed New Zealand's offer to allow Groser
to continue serving as the Chairman of the Negotiating Group
for Agriculture until the summer break. The Chairman will
consult with Members during the period leading up to the July
General Council meeting regarding the agriculture
chairmanship.

DIRECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON
"IMPLEMENTATION-RELATED ISSUES"


15. The Director General recalled that he had made a detailed
report on "implementation-related issues" at the May 19
meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee, reflected in JOB
9583, which will be annexed to a report of this meeting of the
General Council. The highlights of the report were that work
is taking place on two tracks. One track is being led by
Deputy Director General Thompson Flores to address extension
of protection of geographic indications and the other by the
Chairman of WTO bodies, acting as friends of the Director
General, to address remaining outstanding items. Progress
overall has been modest, but the Director General noted that
some ways to move forward deserve further exploration and he
remains hopeful that some substantive results are possible.
The Director General urged Members to keep working on the
items and he will report further on the subject in July.


16. Peru led several other WTO Members in calling for the WTO
to address the issue of the relationship between TRIPS and the
Convention on Bio-diversity, notably with respect to the
disclosure of the origin of genetic resources, prior informed
consent for access and use of the materials, and distribution
of benefits, as part of the patent system. The Members said
the issue of TRIPS and CBD, as well as "traditional
knowledge," needed to be included in the July first
approximation and in the Hong Kong text, with a clear mandate
for modalities, timeframes and components to be included in
the solution to the issue. India, Dominican Republic,
Ecuador, Benin (on behalf of ACP countries),Bolivia,
Paraguay, Brazil, Colombia, China and Costa Rica all spoke up
in support of the Peru statement.

WORK PROGRAM ON
SMALL ECONOMIES


17. The Chairman of the Committee on Trade and Development
noted that the CTD Dedicated Session had met on three
occasions to take up this item. The group was following a
three-step approach to advance work on small economies:
identifying characteristics of small economies, identifying
trade-related problems attributable to such characteristics,
and framing WTO-appropriate solutions to the problems. The
proponents of the discussion recently submitted a new paper
relating to the trade-related challenges attributable to the
particular characteristics of small economies. A formal CTD
dedicated session meeting was held on 25 May to address the
items raised in the new paper, which is useful for the process
of framing responses. Many Members feel that it is necessary
to soon move to addressing the particular problems that have
been identified.


18. Barbados (speaking on behalf of small economy proponents)
observed that it is seeking to avoid the creation of a new
subcategory of developing countries, so it has focused on a
"characteristics-based" approach. The proponents are in the
process of preparing concrete proposals to trade-related
problems encountered by the small economies that will be
submitted to the Doha negotiating groups. The proponents want
to see the results of the review being carried out by the CTD
Dedicated Session reflected in the first approximation.
Guatemala, Bolivia, Honduras, El Salvador, Dominican Republic,
Paraguay, Cuba, Jamaica, Benin (on behalf of the ACP
countries),Nicaragua, Antigua and Barbuda (on behalf of the
Eastern Caribbean states),Solomon Islands (also on behalf of
Papua New Guinea) and Zambia expressed support for the
Barbados statement. Mauritius also supported Barbados, adding
that it wanted to be added as a co-sponsor for the most recent
CTD paper.


19. Australia intervened to observe that many of the
proponents were exporters of fruits and vegetables, and that a
major participant was contemplating treating fruits and
vegetables as a "sensitive item" in the agriculture
negotiations. The EC humorously responded that "Australia
does not need to designate sensitive items, it has SPS
regulations."

TRIPS AND PUBLIC HEALTH


20. The TRIPS Council Chairman reported that the TRIPS and
Public Health had been on the agenda of each Council meeting
and there had also been informal consultations. More time was
needed, because the TRIPS Council has not yet been able to
reach agreement on a recommendation for a permanent solution
to the problem, and the preparation of an amendment to the
TRIPS Agreement was still under consideration.


21. Numerous Members - Rwanda (on behalf of Africa Group),
Zambia (on behalf of the LDC countries),Benin (on behalf of
the ACP),Botswana, and Uganda - intervened to emphasize the
need for a permanent solution, based on the African proposal,
as soon as possible. Overlooking the interim solution that
has been in place since 2004, Zambia, Botswana, Uganda, and
Kenya claimed a permanent solution is necessary because
millions of people are dying in Africa because of pernicious
diseases for which they have no access to medicines. Brazil,
India, and Jamaica supported the need for a permanent
solution, with Brazil emphasizing that it does not see a
linkage between the 2003 decision and the chair's statement.
India and Brazil expressed concern over the inclusion of the
asterisk in reference to the 2003 decision, WT/L/540.


22. The United States, Switzerland, Canada, and Norway spoke
up to give balance to the discussion. Ambassador Deily
reminded Members that the WTO has already delivered on the
issue - the solution is not temporary and it has no
expiration. The issue, she said, is to clarify the legal form
of the agreement, not to change the agreement itself. Canada,
Norway, and Switzerland hit similar themes, with Switzerland
characterizing the discussion as "surrealistic" and "not
giving honor to the organization" because it implies that a
system is not yet in place. Ambassador Girard added that the
chair's statement and the 2003 decision needed to be viewed as
a whole, because otherwise a solution would not have been
possible. Canada and Norway said the waiver enabled them to
put in place legislation and Switzerland said legislation is
currently before Parliament.

NONRECOGNITION OF RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE XXIV.6 AND ARTICLE
XXVIII OF GATT 1994 - COMMUNICATION FROM HONDURAS AND
GUATEMALA


23. The General Council chair reported that she held
consultations on the concerns of Guatemala and Honduras,
adding that differences between Guatemala and Honduras on the
one hand and the EC on the other are large. She drew
attention to a recent communication from Honduras (WT/GC/90)
as well as general concerns among other Members about the
process of negotiating compensation with the EC. Some
Members, she said, have expressed the view that avenues beyond
the legal should be explored given the importance of the
matter to small economies. She said she would continue
consultations to try to find a solution, and she urged Members
to reflect on ways to move the matter forward.


24. Honduras reviewed its arguments regarding the non-
recognition of rights by the EC in respect of the enlargement
process under Article XXIV:6 and the modification of tariff
concessions under Article XXVIII. It reiterated its call for
the EC to acknowledge its claim, reviewing its legal arguments
as set out in WT/GC/90. It argued that there is no precise
definition of substantial supplier interest, adding that such
a determination might vary based on the structure of the
market and vary somewhat from 10 percent. It argued that
special consideration should be given to small developing
countries like Honduras that are heavily dependent on the
product in question and it urged Members to consider the
systemic implications of the issue.


25. Guatemala made a similar statement, supporting Honduras
and stating that it has been trying to address this issue in
various forms for more than ten years. It argued that the
definition of substantial interest is not precise and that it
does not adequately account for distortions caused by
quantitative restrictions and preferential trade. Costa Rica,
Brazil, Panama, Colombia, Argentina, Ecuador, El Salvador,
Mexico, Uruguay, and Nicaragua spoke up to support Honduras
and Guatemala, with many expressing systemic concerns with the
EC's approach and urging the EC to show greater flexibility.
Mexico's representative, for instance, expressed concern that
the EC's approach could set a very bad precedent. They urged
the chair to continue her consultations.


26. Ambassador Trojan responded that the EC accords the
utmost importance to the WTO agreements and it implements WTO
obligations on an objective, rather than ad hoc, basis. This
question is one over legal interpretation, he said, and while
he recognized the right of Honduras and Guatemala to bring
their concerns to the General Council, the General Council is
not well equipped to resolve it. With respect to the systemic
concerns expressed, Trojan argued that systemic problems
require systemic, not ad hoc, solutions. These issues should
be decided in an appropriate forum so that all Members have
the opportunity to subscribe and agree. He closed by saying
that the EC is willing to continue consultations.

APPOINTMENT OF THE NEW DIRECTOR-GENERAL


27. After reviewing the agreed procedures and the three
rounds of consultations over the selection and appointment of
the next Director-General, the General Council chair proposed
that the General Council formally appoint Pascal Lamy of
France to the position of Director-General, for a four-year
term beginning on August 1, 2005. It was so agreed.


28. The chair congratulated Members and paid tribute to the
candidates for the honorable manner in which they carried out
their responsibilities. She said the decision "proved the
skeptics wrong" and forms a solid foundation for the future.
She conveyed appreciation for the work of former Ambassador
Marchi of Canada, a previous General Council chair who helped
to formulate the current guidelines on DG selection as set out
in WT/L/509.


29. Many speeches followed, as ambassadors or their
representatives took the floor to express satisfaction with
the process, congratulate Lamy, pay tribute to the other
candidates and their representatives, and convey their
appreciation for the service of Director-General Supachai,
whose term expires on July 31. France took the floor first,
with UN Ambassador Kessedjian lauding the capabilities of
Pascal Lamy and stating that he would serve the interests of
all Members. EC Ambassador Trojan did the same, adding that
Lamy is capable of steering the DDA to a successful conclusion
in 2006 and stating that other organizations should take note
of the WTO's process for choosing leaders.


30. Other speakers included Rwanda (for the Africa Group),
Tunisia (for the Arab Group),Japan, Argentina (for GRULAC),
Zambia (for LDCs),Benin (for the ACP),Korea, Senegal,
Pakistan, Singapore (for ASEAN),Chinese Taipei, Costa Rica,
the Kyrgyz Republic, Mauritania, and Croatia. Many speakers
expressed hope that Lamy would help to steer the DDA to
success in July and at the upcoming Ministerial Conference in
Hong Kong. The representatives of developing and least-
developed countries stressed the importance of development
issues. Costa Rica referred to its statement at the third
round of informal heads of delegation consultations on the
selection and appointment of the Director-General and asked
that it be entered into the record.

ALBANIA - REQUEST FOR WAIVER TO EXTEND THE STAGING PERIOD FOR
CERTAIN PRODUCTS


31. The General Council approved the decision - forwarded to
it by the Goods Council - approving Albania's waiver request.

COMMITTEE ON BUDGET, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION


32. The General Council took note of the Budget Committee's
report of its meetings in October, November, and December 2004
(WT/BFA/76).


33. Jan-Meinte Postma of the Netherlands, chair of the Budget
Committee, reviewed the Budget Committee's report of the
meeting held in March 2005 (WT/BFA/77),drawing attention to
topics related to the cash situation, the construction of the
new annex building, the security enhancement initiative, and
the financing of travel by LDC delegates to the Ministerial
Conference in Hong Kong. In addition, he reviewed the list of
Members that have accumulated financial arrears up to and
including the 2004 financial year. The General Council took
note of the report and agreed to act on its recommendations.


34. Zambia's representative took the floor to say that his
government recently made a partial payment on its arrears, and
by the end of the year he hoped to be caught up.

ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS RELATING TO THE SIXTH MINISTERIAL
CONFERENCE IN HONG KONG


35. The General Council agreed on procedures for the
accreditation of governments, intergovernmental organizations,
and nongovernmental organizations as observers at the Sixth
Ministerial Conference.


36. With respect to government observers, the chair noted
that 38 governments participated as observers in Cancun.
Since then, Cambodia and Nepal have acceded to the WTO and no
longer need observer status, while four governments have begun
the accession process and would be invited to participate as
observers - Iran, Iraq, Montenegro, and Serbia. In addition,
four other governments have previously been granted observer
status only for Ministerial Conferences - Comoros, Eritrea,
Liberia, and San Marino. The chair proposed that these four
governments, together with the modified list of governments
invited to observe in Cancun, be invited to participate as
observers at the Sixth Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong.
It was so agreed.


37. With respect to international intergovernmental
organization (IGO) observers, the chair reviewed past practice
- first, organizations that are observers to the General
Council are automatically invited; second, organizations that
are observers to subsidiary bodies would be invited if they so
request; and third, consultations would be held to determine
if organizations that are not observers, but that request
attendance, should be invited. She referred to a list of IGOs
that were invited to participate in Cancun
(WT/MIN(03)/INF/5/Rev.1) and proposed that these organizations
also be invited to observe in Hong Kong. Requests from other
organizations that were not observers in Cancun, she said,
would be considered on their merits in keeping with the above
guidelines. It was so agreed.


38. With respect to the request for observer status from the
League of Arab States, which is not currently an observer to
the General Council or its subsidiary bodies, the chair said
that following standard practice, the request would be
accepted unless an objection was received by any Member by
June 15. If there is an objection she said she would report
to the General Council, which could take the issue up.


39. With respect to non-governmental organizations (NGOs),
the chair recalled procedures for attendance at previous
Ministerial Conferences, including 1) NGOs are allowed to
attend only plenary sessions without the right to speak, 2)
applications would be based on Article V, paragraph 2 of the
WTO Agreement, i.e. - they are "concerned with matters related
to those of the WTO," and 3) a deadline would be established
for registering NGOs that wish to attend. She proposed that
similar criteria be used this time, including a requirement
that NGOs supply in detail necessary information indicating
how their work is connected with that of the WTO. Because the
growing number of NGOs related to WTO work has made the
registration process more burdensome, she proposed that NGOs
that were properly registered for at least two previous
Ministerial Conferences should automatically be registered,
although such NGOs would still be obliged to officially
request registration and be subject to all relevant deadlines.
She proposed a timeline in which NGOs would be invited to
apply no later than 29 July, and suggested that registration
forms be made available by 31 August to all NGOs fulfilling
the registration criteria. The NGOs would have to complete
the forms and submit them 30 September, and the list would
then be circulated among all WTO Members for information and
review. Confirmation of registration would follow in mid-
October. It was so agreed.


40. The chair announced that she would begin consultations on
the appointment of a slate of officers, including a chair and
vice chairs, for the Sixth Ministerial Conference. In keeping
with previous practice, she reported that she planned to ask a
representative of the host government - Hong Kong, China - to
chair the meeting. She said she would hold consultations on
the election of three Vice Chairs, and she would provide a
report on the status of her consultations at the next General
Council meeting so that a decision could be taken at that
time.

WTO PENSION PLAN - MANAGEMENT BOARD


41. The General Council adopted the chair's proposal
nominating a chair, four members, and four alternates for a
three-year term on the management board, as set out in
WT/GC/544. Among the approved members is Rachel Shub of
USTR/Geneva.

OTHER BUSINESS


42. The General Council agreed on the selection of Ambassador
Roux (Belgium) to chair the working party on the accession of
Serbia and Ambassador Gossnar (Slovenia) to chair the working
party on the accession of Montenegro.


43. At the end of the meeting, Ambassador Deily made a
farewell statement that was warmly received by the Membership.
She shared some personal observations about her experience in
Geneva, the importance of the work, and the talent and
commitment of participants, and a round of applause followed.
The chair made a gracious statement in response, thanking
Ambassador Deily for her personal friendship, her professional
leadership, and for demonstrating that power and
responsibility go hand in hand.


44. The next meeting of the General Council will take place
on July 27-29, 2005. Deily