Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05GABORONE738
2005-06-02 06:28:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Gaborone
Cable title:  

COURT OK'S DEPORTATION OF CRITICAL ACADEMIC

Tags:  PHUM ELAB PGOV BC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GABORONE 000738 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

AF/S FOR HOFSTATTER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM ELAB PGOV BC
SUBJECT: COURT OK'S DEPORTATION OF CRITICAL ACADEMIC

REF GABORONE 293

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GABORONE 000738

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

AF/S FOR HOFSTATTER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM ELAB PGOV BC
SUBJECT: COURT OK'S DEPORTATION OF CRITICAL ACADEMIC

REF GABORONE 293


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Botswana's High Court has upheld the
constitutionality of a Presidential decree declaring
critical academic Professor Kenneth Good a prohibited
immigrant subject to deportation. Attorneys for the 70-year-
old gadfly had argued that Good's deportation would violate
his right to free expression. Following the ruling against
them, Good's lawyers pleaded for a further stay of execution
to allow him to appeal the decision while still in the
country. The Court denied this request. The judgment in
this case explicitly reinforces the power of the executive
in Botswana and legitimizes the limits to the Government's
accountability to its citizens. END SUMMARY

--------------
DEPORTATION OF CRITIC CONSTITUTIONAL
--------------


2. (U) On May 31, High Court Judge Stanley Sapire delivered
a judgment in the legal challenge filed by University of
Botswana Professor Kenneth Good against a deportation order
issued by the GOB after President Mogae declared Good a
prohibited immigrant (reftel). Good's attorneys argued that
this declaration was prompted by his criticism of the
Government and, as such, his deportation would violate his
right to free expression. In an affidavit, President Mogae
stated that he had received reliable information that the
aging academic was a threat to national security and under
section 13.6 of the Constitution and section 36.1 of the
Immigration Act, declared Professor Good a prohibited
immigrant.


3. (U) In its ruling, the High Court upheld as
constitutional a law which exempts the President from
disclosing the reasons for proclaiming one a prohibited
immigrant, the information that led to such a conclusion, or
the source of that information. The responsibility of the
President to act in the public interest as he defines it,
Judge Sapire continued, takes precedent over individual
rights. Consequently, the deportation of Professor Good for
undisclosed reasons would not be unconstitutional. Judge
Sapire also noted that Mogae did not violate international
treaties such as Article 13 of the International Covenant on
Political and Civil Rights that obligated governments to
give a person a hearing before declaring them a prohibited
immigrant. The Court's judgment recognized that Botswana

had signed certain international conventions that would bar
deportation in such a circumstance but held that until the
provisions of these agreements are incorporated into
domestic law, they are not binding.


4. (U) Immediately following the reading of this judgment,
Good's attorneys requested a second stay of execution to
allow their client the chance to file a notice of appeal
before being removed from the country. Allowing his
expulsion while an appeal is pending, they argued, would
preempt the judicial process. Judge Sapire replied that
Good could pursue an appeal from outside Botswana and that
the Court lacked the authority to issue such an interdict.
Good could appeal, he concluded, but the Court would not
prevent the execution of the deportation order against him.

--------------
GOOD TAKEN INTO CUSTODY AMIDST CONFUSION
--------------


5. (U) The reading of the judgment and plea for a stay of
execution unfolded over a three-hour period, during which
time the judge took two short recesses. Throughout the
proceedings, approximately half a dozen plain clothes law
enforcement officials sat along the wall beside and behind
Good and his attorneys. After the reading of the judgment,
two security officials followed Good everywhere he went
including to the restroom and into a chamber where he
consulted with his attorneys. Only after Good's lead
attorney asked the Attorney General, who appeared on behalf
of the Government, to allow him to converse with his client
privately did the officials withdraw from that chamber.


6. (U) After Judge Sapire denied the request for a stay of
execution, immigration officials began to escort Good to a
government vehicle. A representative of the Australian High
Commission in Pretoria intervened seeking consular access.
Although the GOB officials talked with the Australian
diplomat for approximately fifteen minutes in the presence
of Good and his attorneys, they refused to say where they
were taking Good. They then shuffled Good into a car and
drove away. Several hours later, the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and International Cooperation contacted the diplomat
and allowed him to meet with Good. At 7:00 p.m. that night,
Good was put on a flight to Johannesburg. The Australian
official escorted him to South Africa.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


7. (SBU) The fact that the High Court stayed the execution
of the Government's deportation order on February 19, heard
Good's allegations in an open court, and rendered a decision
apparently without interference from the Government
testifies to the independence of the judiciary in Botswana.
However, by accepting the constitutionality of the
President's ability to deport an immigrant without providing
justification to the judiciary or to the public, the Court
reinforced the imbalance of powers favoring the executive
and legitimized a lack of accountability of elected
officials to their constituents. Through its advocacy and
public outreach, Mission will continue to stress the
importance of transparency and checks on the power of the
executive in a vibrant and stable democracy.

--------------
SUGGESTED PRESS GUIDANCE
--------------


8. (U) Post submits the following as suggested press
guidance: Regarding the deportation from Botswana of
Professor Kenneth Good, the United States notes that the
judicial process has run its course and that the High Court
of Botswana has upheld the constitutionality of the
Government of Botswana's declaration of Professor Good to be
a prohibited immigrant. The United States notes that
Professor Good has lived in Botswana and worked at the
University of Botswana for the last fifteen years. During
that time he spoke out against corruption and in favor of
accountability in government. The United States believes
that the Government of Botswana shares these values and will
continue to respect the freedom of expression that is
necessary for a vibrant and stable democracy.

HUGGINS