Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05DUBAI271
2005-01-18 13:34:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Consulate Dubai
Cable title:  

IRAN'S MAJLIS VOTES TO FREEZE KEY PRICES

Tags:  PREL IR ECON 
pdf how-to read a cable
null
Diana T Fritz 12/06/2006 06:06:15 PM From DB/Inbox: Search Results

Cable 
Text: 
 
 
UNCLAS DUBAI 00271

SIPDIS
CXABU:
 ACTION: POL
 INFO: AMB RSO DCM P/M MEPI ECON

DISSEMINATION: POL
CHARGE: PROG

VZCZCADO928
PP RUEHAD
DE RUEHDE #0271/01 0181334
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 181334Z JAN 05
FM AMCONSUL DUBAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0985
INFO RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 0497
RHMFIUU/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUCAACC/CINCCENT MACDILL AFB FL
RUEAHLC/DHS WASHDC
RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI PRIORITY 3745
RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0037
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 DUBAI 000271 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL IR ECON
SUBJECT: IRAN'S MAJLIS VOTES TO FREEZE KEY PRICES

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 DUBAI 000271

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL IR ECON
SUBJECT: IRAN'S MAJLIS VOTES TO FREEZE KEY PRICES


1. (U) Sensitive But Unclassified - Protect Accordingly


2. (SBU) SUMMARY: On January 11 the Iranian Majlis passed a bill
fixing the price of gasoline and other key goods and services at
September 2004 levels for the upcoming Iranian year 1384 (i.e.
March 21, 2005 - March 20, 2006). The bill's proponents say
that fixing will decrease inflation and force the government to
economize. Opponents label the bill as a political gambit to
keep key consumer prices low before the June 2005 Presidential
election, a perception which seems to be prevalent among
political observers. The Guardian Council is expected to
approve the bill. END SUMMARY.


3. (U) On January 11 the Iranian Majlis passed a bill fixing the
price of key goods and services for the upcoming Iranian year
1384 (March 21, 2005-March 20, 2006) at September 2004 levels.
The bill was titled "Substituting Article Three of the Fourth
Development Plan (FYDP)," and was more popularly known as the
"Stabilizing Goods and Services Bill" (NOTE: Iran's Third FYDP
ends March 20, 2005, with the Fourth FYDP starting on March 21,
2005). The Guardian Council is expected to approve the bill.


4. (U) This bill revised Article Three of the Fourth FYDP such
that the sales price of gasoline, diesel, kerosene, furnace oil
and other oil products, as well as gas, electricity, water and
drainage service charges, phone call and postal rates in the
Iranian year starting March 21, 2005 will remain at Shahrivar
month 1383 (i.e. August-September 2004) levels. The bill also
stipulates that for the subsequent years of the Fourth FYDP,
prices will be set on the basis of plans presented to the Majlis
by the government each September, with any suggested price
increases for each item having to be justified on socio-economic
grounds.


5. (U) The bill also mandates that by the end of the second year
of the Fourth FYDP (March 20, 2007) the government is obliged to
take sufficient steps, to include economizing in fuel product
usage and increasing public transportation capacity, such that
all of Iran's domestic needs for fuel products are met by the
output of Iran's refineries. The bill also authorizes state-run
gas and electricity companies to fine non-industrial entities
exceeding the consumption level authorized by the Majlis each
year.

ADMINISTRATION ATTACKS PLAN...
--------------


6. (U) This bill, put forward by the dominant conservative

faction within the Majlis, had become a source of much political
controversy in the recent weeks. Administration reformists
involved in the drafting of the Fourth FYDP, to include Economy
and Finance Minister Safdar Hoseyni and Management and Planning
Organization (MPO) head Hamid Reza Baradaran-e Shoraka, came out
strongly against its passage. MPO head Baradaran-e Shoraka told
press that the bill's passage would worsen the existing
projected budget deficit. He added that price stabilization in
the coming year would obstruct many planned government programs,
and that, if the Majlis bill were approved, "the government will
have no alternative but to take money from the foreign exchange
reserve." President Khatami's Parliamentary Deputy
Hojjatoleslam Majid Ansari told press that the bill was contrary
to the macro-policies of the Supreme Leader as articulated in
the Fourth FYDP, which include creating jobs and optimizing fuel
consumption.


7. (U) Government spokesman Abdollah Ramazanzadeh told ISNA that
the bill had been drafted "based on political objectives." In
his December 27, 2004 weekly press conference, Ramazanzadeh
spoke out harshly against the (then) draft bill, saying that
with the decreased government income, the government would no
longer be able to achieve the following goals:

- providing funds for the Social Security system for the poor;

- increasing the resistance of urban and rural buildings and
residences to earthquakes;

- expanding and increasing the efficiency of urban and
inter-city public transportation, producing duel-fuel
automobiles and expanding the supply of compressed natural gas
at subsidized prices;

- decreasing the number of incident-prone road locations and
equipping a network of emergency pre-hospital and hospital
medical care;

- implementing plans to optimize fuel-use technology in
factories while decreasing air pollution.

8. (U) Ramazanzadeh predicted that the decreased income to
government companies would decrease the flow of taxes and
profits to the government, and push some of these companies into
the red. He also claimed that the decrease in government income
would increase the budget deficit, which would in turn increase
liquidity, exacerbate inflation and necessitate increased
withdrawals from the Oil Stabilization Fund.

GAS PRICES TOO LOW
--------------

9. (U) Majlis representative Hassan Afarideh, a staunch opponent
of the bill, told press before the bill's passage that by
keeping gasoline prices artificially low, this bill would have
major adverse consequences (the current price is approximately
10 cents/liter, or 40 cents a gallon). He said that Iran was
currently using 63 million liters of gasoline daily, with a ten
percent annual growth in recent years. If Iran's gasoline
consumption continues to grow at the present rate, Iran's daily
consumption would be 310 million liters in Iranian year 1400
(March 21, 2021-March 20, 2022). To be produced domestically,
this amount would require 6 million barrels of crude oil per day
(bpd) for refining, and 40 refineries, the construction of which
would cost approximately 80 billion dollars. He said that Iran,
with a population of approximately 70 million, was using the
same amount of gasoline annually as was India, with a population
of over one billion. Afarideh said that low gasoline prices
encourage consumption and decrease economic incentives for
getting rid of fuel-inefficient vehicles and bringing to market
fuel-efficient vehicles. He urged that instead of fixing Iran's
gasoline prices at an artificially low level, the price be
raised to the FOB Persian Gulf price.

ON THE OTHER HAND...
--------------


10. (U) The Majlis Research Center, headed by Tehran
representative (and possible Presidential candidate) Ahmad
Tavakoli, was the original drafter of the Price Stabilization
bill. Tavakoli, known for his pro-statist, anti-free market
economic views, has also been one of the bill's main proponents
in the Majlis. Contrary to Administration positions, he
trumpeted the bill as a major tool in reining in runaway
government expenses and controlling inflation. He told press
that had the Fourth FYDP been implemented without changing
Article 3, it would have caused a severe budget deficit and
"rampant inflation that would have dealt a heavy blow to the
productive private sector and to exporters." He boasted to
press that the price stabilization bill would prevent
"back-breaking pressure" on Iran's people and on its private
sector producers and manufacturers, and would also prevent both
an increase of government presence in the economy and a budget
deficit.


11. (U) In response to reporters' questions as to whether this
bill would decrease government income, Tavakoli explained that
the government budget had two parts: the government's general
budget and the budget for government companies, banks and
subordinate institutions. When Government companies producing
goods are not allowed to raise prices, it doesn't affect the
government's income but rather only decreases the government's
general expenses, as the government itself is a consumer of some
of these goods. He claimed that decreased government expenses
from buying many goods at last year's rates would partially
offset decreased revenue. He also claimed that government
companies could compensate for lost revenues by economizing in
current expenses (critics have pointed out however that
economizing is hard when, for example, existing Iranian labor
laws prevent government workers from being dismissed).


12. (U) When accused of politicking, Majlis Speaker Gholamali
Haddad-Adel replied that since the bill benefited the people,
the Majlis should not avoid approving it solely because its
passage would be to the political benefit of its supporters. He
told Iranian press before the bill's passage that the annual
government price increase for these targeted goods and services
had created many problems for the people, especially fixed-wage
earners and the poor. He claimed that the government should
think of 'other ways' to overcome economic problems, besides
raising prices. He told press that this bill's passage was just
one step in the Majlis's ongoing efforts to combat "financial
indiscipline."


13. (SBU) COMMENT: Based on anecdotal information gleaned by
Poloff, the popular perception among political analysts is that
the Majlis's motivation in passing the bill passage was in fact
exclusively political, to bolster the conservatives' popularity
before the June 2005 Presidential election. The consensus of
Iran's economists as reflected in Iranian print media seems to
be that the bill's overall effect will be deleterious,
increasing the government's budget deficit and crippling
government efforts to decrease gasoline usage by bringing its
price in line with regional prices.


14. (SBU) COMMENT CONT'D: The passage of this bill, like the
Majlis cancellation of the "Tav" and "Turkcell" contracts, the
possible cancellation of the Renault L-90 automobile contract,
and other similar measures being considered by the Majlis, is
another indication that this Majlis's agenda is being set by its
so-called 'neo-conservatives,' i.e. the younger, radicalized
conservatives aligned with the IRGC and the "Isargaran"
political party, as opposed to the traditional conservative
faction aligned with the Islamic Coalition Association
('Motalafeh') and the Militant Clergy Association ('Ruhaniat'),
who were predominant in the Fourth and Fifth Majlis (1992-96,
1996-2000). This group is pursuing a policy of decreasing the
influence of foreign companies on the Iranian economy and
increasing state intervention, reversing the general trend of
the Khatami years.