Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05DARESSALAAM686
2005-04-06 13:02:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Cable title:  

JOINT REFUGEE DEMARCHE: TIMING NOT RIGHT

Tags:  PREF PGOV EAID TZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 DAR ES SALAAM 000686 

SIPDIS

NAIROBI FOR FFP BACON
KAMPALA FOR REFCORD
GENEVA FOR RMA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 4/4/15
TAGS: PREF PGOV EAID TZ
SUBJECT: JOINT REFUGEE DEMARCHE: TIMING NOT RIGHT

REF: STATE 41723

Classified by Charge d'Affaires Michael S. Owen for reasons
1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 DAR ES SALAAM 000686

SIPDIS

NAIROBI FOR FFP BACON
KAMPALA FOR REFCORD
GENEVA FOR RMA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 4/4/15
TAGS: PREF PGOV EAID TZ
SUBJECT: JOINT REFUGEE DEMARCHE: TIMING NOT RIGHT

REF: STATE 41723

Classified by Charge d'Affaires Michael S. Owen for reasons
1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (C) Summary: Members of the diplomatic corps discussed
the proposed reftel joint demarche on refugees on March 24,
on the margins of the monthly joint UN briefing on the
refugee situation. The diplomats and UNHCR officials alike
thought that the timing was wrong for a joint demarche,
since Tanzanian government official had stopped making
inflammatory anti-refugee remarks in their campaigns,
refugee screening had improved, and there had been no
recent refoulments. All agreed in principle to a joint
demarche at some future time, if and when the situation
deteriorates. The consensus was that a joint demarche
should contain pre-agreed, generic language emphasizing
respect for international refugee conventions, and noting
with concern whatever event triggered the demarche. End
Summary.


2. (C) UNHCR Country Director, Chrysantus Ache, said he
thought that any support the international community
provides for refugee protection was in principle a good
thing. However, he thought what the international
community had done so far was sufficient. He said UNHCR
had vigorously protested refoulments with Tanzanian
Government officials. Ache believed that the formation of
ad hoc screening committees, with UNHCR as observers, was a
clear step in the right direction. He urged any concerned
diplomats to attend the Protection workshop planned for
April 5-6, which would address screening, human rights
violations, and freedom of movement. Ache said that senior
UNHCR official Erica Feller would travel to Tanzania to
participate in the workshop and to continue to push the
government to respect international conventions. Ache also
said it was important for any future joint demarche to be
delivered in Bujumbura and Kinshasa as well, since the
UNHCR faced strong pressure from these governments to
repatriate refugees.


3. (C) The Norwegian diplomatic representative, Inger
Tveit, expressed concern about language in the proposed
demarche urging government officials to avoid politicizing
refugee issues, because in an election campaign,

immigration and asylum are legitimate topics for debate.
She also said she was concerned that the timing was
inappropriate, since refoulments had now ceased. In the
future, she suggested that any demarche on refugees should
begin with language supporting continued adherence to 1951
Convention. Tveit said these were her personal comments,
which she did not have the opportunity to clear with her
Foreign Ministry.


4. (C) British DFID representative Julia Norton expressed
her concern that the timing was inappropriate, because the
refugee situation had recently improved. She was also
concerned about whether the Minister of Home Affairs or the
Minister of State should receive any demarche, since past
problems seemed to have originated with the District and
Regional Commissioners, who do not answer to the Ministry
of Home Affairs.


5. (C) The European Commission Humanitarian
Representative, Yves Horton, said he continued to be
concerned about refugee human rights violations in Ngara
district, but he concurred with the consensus agreement
that the timing was not right for this joint demarche. He
said he thought that in the future, it was important to be
able to respond quickly to any refoulments that occurred;
currently UNHCR and diplomats were unable to do so. He
said he would recommend to Brussels the consensus agreement
to not deliver the joint demarche at this time.


6. (C) World Food Program Country Director Patrick Buckley
said he was also concerned that "timing was everything in
politics" and that the timing for this demarche had passed.
He offered to provide the budget information that the WFP
had already gathered about its programs in refugee-hosting
areas. He also said any future demarche should emphasize
not only the past benefits but the prospective benefits the
Government could realize from the continued hosting of
refugees.


7. (C) UNICEF emergency officer Robert Carr said that
UNICEF was working with other UN agencies to bridge the
"humanitarian to development aid gap," which will open when
refugees leave Northwest Tanzania. He said the newly
formed working group might have information about the ways
in which refugee hosting areas benefit from the presence of
refugees.


8. (U) Swedish diplomat Ditte Engell said she had
contacted Stockholm about the demarche but her embassy had
not received any information about it.


9. (C) Comment: Post agrees that the time for a joint
demarche on refugees has passed. To further press the
issue when it has fallen off the radar screen may just
encourage a political backlash. Post thinks the best
approach is to agree on generic language that each capital
could pre-approve for rapid delivery if and when
refoulments or serious violations occur again. If this
approach is approved, Poloff will work with the diplomatic
corps to circulate a draft of the generic language. Poloff
continues to work with UN agencies to document how refugee
hosting areas have received concrete benefits from the
presence of refugees. Please advise on the next steps for
the joint demarche. End Comment.

OWEN