Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05DAMASCUS5866
2005-11-08 14:42:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Damascus
Cable title:  

MALEH SLANDER TRIAL DELAYED BY TECHNICALITIES

Tags:  PGOV PHUM SY 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L DAMASCUS 005866 

SIPDIS

PARIS FOR ZEYA, LONDON FOR TSOU, DRL FOR JEANETTE DAVIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/07/2015
TAGS: PGOV PHUM SY
SUBJECT: MALEH SLANDER TRIAL DELAYED BY TECHNICALITIES

REF: DAMASCUS 005667

Classified By: CDA Stephen Seche for reasons 1.4(b)/(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L DAMASCUS 005866

SIPDIS

PARIS FOR ZEYA, LONDON FOR TSOU, DRL FOR JEANETTE DAVIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/07/2015
TAGS: PGOV PHUM SY
SUBJECT: MALEH SLANDER TRIAL DELAYED BY TECHNICALITIES

REF: DAMASCUS 005667

Classified By: CDA Stephen Seche for reasons 1.4(b)/(d)


1. (C) Prominent human rights activist and lawyer Haitham
al-Maleh,s trial continued at the Syrian Military Court on
November 7. Maleh told Poloff that the case stems from a
letter he sent to President Bashar al-Asad in July 2005 in
reference to a criminal case that was conducted in the Field
Military Court in 2000. In his July letter to Bashar, Maleh
called for the nullification of the Field Military Court Law,
which was introduced in 1968 &at the beginning of a
dictatorial regime.8 He also criticized the Field Military
Court as being an unjust system, under which people had been
killed. It is on the basis of this letter that the four
charges of slander against Maleh were filed: three based on
criminal law and one based on military law (reftel).


2. (C) During the brief hearing, Maleh presented a request
that the lone military law-based charge be dropped and that
the other three charges be continued in criminal court.
Maleh argued to the judge that the Military Court has no
jurisdiction in his case as he is not a member of the
military, nor can civilians be court-martialed by the
military court. When the judge argued that Syria is still in
a state of war and therefore military law applies, Maleh
countered that Syria has not really been in a state of war
since the 1991 Madrid Peace Conference.


3. (C) No further action was taken on the case, as no
representative from the Syrian Bar Association was present to
represent Maleh. (Note: According to Maleh,s legal team,
Syrian legal procedures require that when a Bar Member like
Maleh appears as a defendant, a representative of the Bar
Association must be part of the defense team). Ahmad Fayez
Fawaz, the current president of Human Rights Association of
Syria, noted to Poloff that it would be a scandal for the
Ba,ath Party-affiliated Bar Association to defend such an
outspoken critic of the regime and he speculated that the Bar
was trying its best to avoid having to participate.


4. (C) Maleh is not being detained by SARG authorities.
The next hearing date is set for December 1.


SECHE