INDIA'S NORTHEAST MILITANCY: AN OVERVIEW

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 CALCUTTA 000246

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR SA/INS, S/CT AND INR

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PINS PTER PGOV PREL SOCI IN
SUBJECT: INDIA'S NORTHEAST MILITANCY: AN OVERVIEW


1. (U) SUMMARY. This cable provides an overview of the
"alphabet soup" of ethnic insurgencies that have plagued India's
Northeast throughout its history. The first three paragraphs
provide a broad overview of the factors that have spawned these
conflicts and should be of general interest to India
policymakers. The remainder details the history and activities
of the main individual groups and is targeted to a more
specialist audience. END SUMMARY.

BACKGROUND: ALIENATION BREEDS CONFLICT
--------------


2. (U) Northeast India, home to nearly 40 million people, is
surrounded by international boundaries with China, Bhutan, Burma
and Bangladesh. The population of the Northeast is largely of
East and Central Asian origin and is culturally quite distinct
from the rest of South Asia; ethnically as well as
geographically it is considered to be a gateway that links India
to East and Southeast Asia. The region is connected to the rest
of India by a narrow piece of land, the 21-kilometer "chicken's
neck" between Bangladesh and Nepal, and comprises eight states -
Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, Arunachal
Pradesh and Sikkim. Over 150 indigenous communities speaking
more than 420 languages and dialects inhabit the area. While
non-tribals dominate Assam and Tripura, over 60 per cent of the
other states are populated by tribes scheduled in the Indian
Constitution. Moreover, there are radical differences between
the inhabitants of the hills and plains in the region, like the
Meiteis and the Nagas of Manipur. Historically, some of these
communities did have cultural and economic ties with the rest of
India but politically they were never the subjects of the
empires or kingdoms that ruled India prior to the advent of the
British. Annexation brought the Northeast into the fold of
British India in the second half of the 19th century. Policies
initiated then introduced changes that contributed to ethnic
tensions in the region.


3. (SBU) With independence in 1947, the Indian ruling elite
tried to integrate the Northeast into the Indian state with a
carrot and stick policy. But from the 1950s onwards, this was
met with resistance by the Naga insurgency. In subsequent
decades, other communities also took to arms and the scale of
conflict prevalent in the region has ebbed and flowed, but has
frequently been akin to low intensity warfare. The partition of
India was disastrous for the Northeast since the creation of
East Pakistan resulted in severance of inland waterways, roads
and railways, access to Chittagong port and vital economic
linkages. Partition also brought waves of unwanted migration
that upset the demographic equations in the region. There was
no economic development to match the new needs of the region,
and the backwardness heightened the people's feeling of
isolation and alienation vis-`-vis "mainland" India. For a long
period the Northeast remained largely excluded from India's
process of nation-building and modernization. Development funds
for the states have often fallen into corrupt hands and leaked
into the coffers of insurgent groups. The complete failure of
the political leadership of the region enabled the ethnic groups
to aggressively voice their sub-national aspirations and the
easy availability of arms led to further deterioration in the
security situation. For most of its history the GOI conceived
the region as a strategic area where military strength should be
concentrated to maintain order, a view that was strongly
reinforced by the Sino-Indian War in 1962. At the same time,
the government's management of porous international borders
remained ineffective.


4. (SBU) Northeast conflicts are broadly perceived as ethnic
identities confronting the mainstream Indian state. However, a
closer look reveals a greater complexity. Confrontations may be
categorized as a) indigenous group versus state; b) tribe versus
tribe; and c) tribal versus non-tribal. In any particular
conflict, more than one of these elements may overlap. The
objectives of the various movements have included complete
secession and independence, state formation, regional autonomy,
a right to self-determination, and eviction of outsiders. Some
of the groups have largey lost touch wit their ideological
roots and are essentially maitaining a livelihood through
politically justified banditry. Each state has specific
concerns and each people their particular grievances. Although
rebel alliances exist, each group has its own agenda that often
does not accommodate the aspirations of other groups. For
instance, the ULFA does not approve of the NSCN-IM's goal of
Greater Nagaland, since it would incorporate parts of Assam.
Overall, the primary battle of each group is for territorial
supremacy over areas they claim to represent. For this reason,
the Nagas are in conflict with Manipuris and Kukis, and the
Bodos have killed Santhals.

THE ALPHABET SOUP INSURGENCIES: WHO ARE THEY?
-------------- -


5. (SBU) Following are sketches of the history and current
activities of the major insurgent movements in the area, broken
down by state, according to the following index:

A) Assam
-- United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA)
-- Bodo ethnic groups
-- National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB)
-- Bodo Liberation Tigers (BLT)

B) Nagaland
-- National Socialist Council of Nagalim-Isak-Muivah
(NSCN-IM)
-- National Socialist Council of Nagalim-Khaplang
(NSCN-K)

C) Tripura
-- National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT)
-- All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF)

D) Manipur
-- United National Liberation Front (UNLF)
-- People's Liberation Army (PLA)
-- The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak
(PREPAK)
-- Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup (KYKL)

E) Meghalaya
-- Achik National Volunteer Council (ANVC)
-- Hynniewtrep National Liberation Council (HNLC)

F) State-wise listing of minor groups by name and acronym

A) ASSAM:

United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA)

Assam, the most populous state in the region, has a multi-ethnic
and multi-lingual society. A majority of ethnic Assamese and 16
tribes constitute Assam's indigenous population. Assam's
peripheral location in India, its resultant under-development
and dramatic changes in its demography caused by an influx of
Bangladeshis across the borders have triggered militancy. The
ULFA, the most formidable insurgent outfit, demands sovereignty
for Assam.
It is a secessionist ethnic insurgent socialist organization
employing terrorist tactics. Founded on April 7, 1979, the ULFA
enjoyed mass support in its initial years but gradually lost its
popularity. From its inception to 1985, ULFA failed to make any
real impact since the Assam Movement against "foreigners,"
specifically Bengali settlers, was led by the All Assam
Students' Union (AASU) and dominated the state's political
scene. The Assam Movement formally ended on August 15, 1985 and
some of its leaders formed the state government. It was then
that ULFA made its presence felt and launched its mission to
"liberate Assam from Delhi's colonialism." New Delhi banned the
ULFA in 1990 and started a military offensive against it. The
ULFA's kidnappings, murders, extortion and its leadership's big
business undertakings in neighboring countries -- particularly
Bangladesh - harmed its public image. Public opinion turned
against ULFA when its leaders expressed support for Pakistan
during the 1999 Kargil military operation. In 2005, the United
States added the group to the Other Selected Terrorist
Organizations (OSTO) list.

In 1997 a spurt in ULFA activities led the GOI to form the
Unified Command -- of army, paramilitary, police and state
Government. Since 1998, hundreds of ULFA members have
surrendered, but hardcore militants stayed in their camps in
Bhutan, Burma and Bangladesh. The ULFA's numerical strength was
depleted by the attack on its Bhutan camps in December 2003 by
the Royal Bhutan Army and the Indian Army. The estimated
committed cadre strength now is about 700. In its initial
years, government officials, businessmen, tea planters and
politicians were the major targets. In recent years it has
killed civilians including children as well as Hindi-speaking
migrants. In 2003 ULFA killed more than 60 "outsiders," mainly
from the state of Bihar, in Assam. On August 15, 2004, India's
Independence Day, a bomb blast in Dhemaji killed an estimated 13
people, including 6 children, and injured 21. In addition,
numerous bomb blasts at oil installations and other
infrastructure are regularly reported.

The GOI accuses ULFA of maintaining links with Pakistan's
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the Directorate General of
Field Intelligence of Bangladesh. Intelligence sources believe
that the ULFA procures and trades in arms with other Northeast
Indian outfits and the Maoists of Nepal. The GOI claims that
ULFA workers also visit Nepal and have some connection with the
Maoists. Important leaders include Paresh Barua
(Commander-in-Chief) and Arabinda Rajkhowa (Chairman) based in
Bangladesh. ULFA workers are believed to be present in the
states of Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Nagaland. The ULFA
has linkages with other ethnic insurgent outfits active in
neighboring states like the National Socialist Council of
Nagaland - Khaplang (NSCN-K) and the United National Liberation
Front (UNLF). Other ULFA "satellites" - like the National
Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) and the Kamtapur Liberation
Organization (KLO) - were badly affected by the Bhutan operation.

In 2004-2005, Assamese author Indira Goswami took the initiative
to work out a way to bring the GOI and the ULFA to the
negotiating table. Despite the GOI's willingness, the ULFA time
and again set conditions for talks that are difficult to
fulfill. The outfit insisted on the pre-condition that
sovereignty should figure in the talks, a provision the GOI
reportedly accepted with some reluctance in the hope that this
would facilitate peace. But then the ULFA leadership insisted
that those leaders of the outfit who have been arrested and
detained in Assam should be released. As of July 2005, this has
created a deadlock since the government cannot release insurgent
leaders without formal assurance of a ceasefire and negotiations
by the ULFA. Assam's Congress Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi is
reportedly keen that the detainees be released, but New Delhi is
reluctant. New Delhi has also tried to persuade Bangladesh to
crack down on Indian militant camps on its soil and to extradite
ULFA leader Anup Chetia. Significantly, although the ULFA has
attacked "outsiders," it has not targeted Bangladeshi migrants
in Assam in recent times. Analysts interpret this as the result
of a tacit understanding between the outfit and the Bangladesh
authorities that shelter its leaders.

The ULFA's inclusion in the U.S. OSTO list drew a favorable
response from Assam's security officials, although the Congress,
preparing for state elections in 2006, expressed reservations on
the timing of this development. Security analysts felt that the
listing was not only a warning to the ULFA, but also to
Bangladesh where the militant leadership lives with support from
the establishment. However, the ULFA responded with an appeal
to the U.S. to intervene in the "political conflict" and help
peace dawn on Assam - a sign that the outfit is responsive to
U.S. and global opinion.

BODO ETHNIC GROUPS

National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB)

The National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) is a
secessionist ethnic insurgent organization demanding an
independent state for the Bodo ethnic group in Assam. Formed on
October 3, 1986, and led by Chairman Ranjan Daimary, this is one
of the most dreaded outfits of Northeast India and one that
shared close ties with the ULFA. The group's strength has
dwindled since the 2003 operations in Bhutan. The NDFB also
suffered serious setbacks in the recent past with the arrests of
senior leaders. The group indulged in hit and run operations on
security forces, explosions in public places and have targeted
innocent people. The organization is allegedly supported by the
ISI of Pakistan, and is believed to have bases in Bangladesh,
Burma, and perhaps still a lingering presence in Bhutan.

In October 2004, the NDFB declared a ceasefire with the GOI and
then extended it for another six months in April 2005. On May
25, a GOI-NDFB truce agreement was signed by Special Secretary
in the Union Home Ministry Anil Chaudhary, Assam Home Secretary
B K Gohain and NDFB General Secretary Gobinda Basumatary. This
agreement came into effect from June 1, 2005. According to
contacts, the truce is similar to the one the GOI signed with
the Naga outfit NSCN-IM, including the ground-rules of the
ceasefire, suspension of operations and signaling the beginning
of formal talks. Sources said that the NDFB and GOI had been
holding unofficial parleys since April 2005, and the signing of
the agreement is only its culmination and formalization.

Another Bodo outfit, the Bodo Liberation Tigers (BLT) has
already negotiated with the Center and made peace. The BLT and
the All Bodo Students Union (ABSU) participated in polls for the
Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) on May 13, that would
facilitate a sort of limited self-governance to Bodos in
Kokrajhar, Baska, Udalguri and Chirang districts. The NDFB did
not participate in the polls. The Bodo groups are disunited and
the NDFB, now isolated, has come under pressure to make peace.

However, the Government of India may find it difficult to find
an early solution to the problem with the NDFB still sticking to
its demand for an independent Bodoland. If the outfit maintains
this stand, the government may find it difficult to persuade
them to accept more powers under the Indian constitution.
Moreover, the BTC was created only in December 2003 after the
signing of the peace pact between the Central and State
governments and the erstwhile militant group Bodo Liberation
Tigers (BLT). The NDFB and BLT are rivals and it will be
difficult for the government to find any peace formula that will
satisfy both groups.

B) NAGALAND:

National Socialist Council of Nagalim-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM)

When India became independent in 1947, the Nagas (then
inhabitants of the Naga Hills in undivided Assam) were unwilling
to be part of the new republic and launched an armed struggle
for a sovereign Naga homeland. The creation of Nagaland state
in 1963 failed to contain their militancy. The Nagas' mindset
compelled them to launch a separatist crusade, even symbolically
declaring "independence" from the British one day before India
did so in 1947. Neither economic problems nor the lack of
development motivated the birth of Naga insurgency. Rather,
cultural and historical factors played the dominant role in the
Naga ethnic upheaval. At the time of independence the Nagas
were not psychologically prepared to be part of India because
they had never in their history perceived themselves as Indians.
The Naga secessionist movement originated to ensure a Naga way
of life in a Naga homeland. The nature of Naga society itself
prompted the birth of their "nationalist" movement. The most
important impact of the British occupation of the Naga Hills
from the mid-19th century was the spread of Christianity and
Western education. Along with the conversion of large sections
of Nagas, the education provided by the missionaries helped
weaken the exclusive clan allegiance of each sub-tribe and paved
the way for the growth of a pan-Naga consciousness. A sort of
common Naga identity based on Christianity emerged. The Naga
community in India consists of 17 major tribes and at least 20
sub-tribes. They inhabit primarily Nagaland, and small areas in
Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. Other Naga tribes live
across the border in Burma. There have been about 20,000
insurgency-related deaths in Nagaland since India's independence.

The movement for a sovereign Nagaland by Nagas was one of the
first major challenges to India's nation-building process. The
Naga National Council (NNC) under Angami Zapu Phizo initially
led the revolt against the Center. In 1963, New Delhi created
Nagaland state but could not quell the movement. Aided by
Pakistan and China, and despite confrontations with Indian
security forces, Naga rebels continued with violence. The NNC
was banned in 1972. NNC moderates accepted the Indian
Constitution by the 1975 Shillong Accord with New Delhi.
Subsequently, NNC radicals formed the National Socialist Council
of Nagalim (NSCN) in 1980 for the cause of a greater Nagaland
encompassing all Naga inhabited areas in the Northeast. There
were inter-tribe clashes within the NSCN. It split in 1988 with
one faction under Isak Chisi Swu and Thuingaleng Muivah and the
other led by S. Khaplang. The NSCN-(Isak-Muivah) (NSCN-IM)
emerged the more powerful of the two outfits. A cease-fire was
initiated between the GOI and NSCN-IM in 1997, but negotiations
to ensure a lasting peace have not progressed much since then.
In April 2000 the NSCN-Khaplang (NSCN-K) group declared a
cease-fire, but no productive talks have ensued. A successful
outcome to the Naga talks would set a precedent for all other
Northeast insurgencies and is therefore viewed by many as
crucial for peace in the region.

The NSCN-IM is an insurgent group of Nagas, operating in
Nagaland, Assam, Manipur, and Arunachal Pradesh. The Tangkhul
tribe of Nagas based in the Manipur hills dominates the outfit.
The estimated cadre strength is 4,500. The NSCN-IM's objective
is to establish Greater Nagaland (Nagalim) consisting of all
Naga inhabited areas in Northeast India. The outfit has
linkages in Burma, Bangladesh, Thailand and the Netherlands.
General Secretary Thuingaleng Muivah and Chairman Isak Chisi Swu
are negotiating for a peace settlement with GOI, and have
virtually given up the demand for full sovereignty. During the
BJP regime at the Center, New Delhi acknowledged the "unique
history" of the Nagas, something that the NSCN interpreted as a
sign of a positive direction in the negotiations. In January
2003, the NSCN-IM leadership, until then living in exile either
in Bangkok or in Amsterdam, visited India after decades for
talks with the GOI. Despite the optimism, the two sides reached
no substantial agreements.

With the new Congress government in New Delhi since May 2004,
the peace negotiations seem to remain deadlocked. The UPA
Government's Common Minimum Program described the borders of the
Northeast states as inviolable. This means that the demand for
Greater Nagaland (comprising parts of Manipur, Assam and
Arunachal Pradesh) cannot be met. That said, it is the vehement
- and in the past violent - opposition of the neighboring states
that really constrains the Center from agreeing to re-draw the
state boundaries on strictly ethnic lines. On other issues, the
GOI is quite flexible and is believed to have unofficially
agreed to the rebels' demand for greater autonomy in all
departments barring currency, external affairs, communication
and defense, but the NSCN-IM leadership is unwilling to
compromise on the question of territorial integrity of Naga
inhabited areas. The issue is highly contentious since the
NSCN-IM's leadership is dominated by Tangkhuls, who are mostly
from Manipur. The NSCN-IM has called on Nagas to be prepared
for any eventuality, implicitly threatening the GOI with a
return to arms. The outfit's charter of demands also includes a
separate flag, opening of trade and tourism centers under the
new Naga flag, control over taxation, greater control over
natural resources and a new name for the state assembly in their
ethnic language. The rebel leaders returned to India in
December 2004, but departed again in early July 2005, apparently
without having achieved any progress in the talks.

National Socialist Council of Nagalim-Khaplang (NSCN-K)

The Naga insurgency is fraught with tribal factionalism. The
NSCN-K is active in eastern Nagaland, parts of Arunachal Pradesh
and Burma. It is the rival group of NSCN-IM, and is led by
Chairman S.S. Khaplang. The NSCN-K was formed on April 30,
1988, following an assassination attempt on the General
Secretary of what emerged as the rival outfit NSCN-IM,

SIPDIS
Thuingaleng Muivah. Clannish divisions among the Nagas (Konyaks
and Tangkhuls) were the primary reason behind the split of the
NSCN in 1988. The Konyaks formed the NSCN-K (Khaplang) under
the leadership of Khole Konyak and Khaplang.

This group aims at establishing a Greater Nagaland comprising
Naga inhabited areas in eastern India and contiguous areas in
Burma. The organization runs a government in exile, with its
cadre strength exceeding 2,000. A large section of the group's
workers reside in Burma, where it maintains training camps and
its headquarters. Although it is under ceasefire with the GOI,
there have been no negotiations as yet. There are frequent
reports of clashes between cadres of NSCN-IM and NSCN-K in and
around Nagaland, something that has contributed to growing
disunity within the Naga community. The Government of Burma has
reportedly cracked down occasionally on the camps of the NSCN-K.

C) TRIPURA:

National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT)

A tribal insurgent outfit in Tripura, the NLFT was first formed
in 1989 by some top leaders of the rebel Tripura National
Volunteers (TNV) which surrendered following an accord with the
Rajiv Gandhi government in 1988. It has two factions - one led
by Biswamohan Debbarma and the other by Nayanbashi Jamatia.
NLFT's founder-president Dhananjay Reang was ousted by a coup
led by Tripuri (tribal) leaders, the Debbarmas, in December

1993. The Debbarma faction is dominant, aiming to establish an
"independent" Tripura through armed struggle. It resorts to
killings and abductions of Bengalis (whose influx have reduced
the tribals to a minority) and sometimes of tribals. The
estimated strength is 800 cadres. The outfit is believed to
have most of its camps in Bangladesh (from where they conduct
hit and run operations in Tripura's border areas) and some in
Burma. The weaker NLFT faction is led by the Jamatia community.
In April 2004, the Jamatia faction of NLFT signed a memorandum
with representatives of the State and GOI, agreeing to a
cessation of hostilities. In Tripura, where the ruling
government is led by the Communist Party of India-Marxist
(CPI-M),the NLFT has in the past supported the opposition
Congress Party (through a "legitimate" front organization that
entered an alliance) and also unleashed significant violence
before and during elections. However, with the Congress having
now weakened considerably in state politics, the NLFT's violence
has been toned down. Indian security forces have also enticed
some rebel workers of the NLFT to desert.

All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF)

The All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF) was founded on July 11, 1990,
under the leadership of Ranjit Debbarma. It was initially called
the All Tripura Tribal Force, a small group operating in pockets
of North and South districts of Tripura. Its objective is to
evict outsiders (Bengalis) and establish independent Tripura,
and also to restore land to dispossessed tribals. The cadre
strength is now approximately 600. By 1991, it had emerged as a
formidable group, but in March 1994, more than 1,600 cadres
surrendered under an amnesty scheme offered by the state
government. It is a group of ATTF cadres who did not surrender
who subsequently revived the organization.

The ATTF headquarters are believed to be located at Tarabon in
Bangladesh. ATTF cadres are reported to have received training
in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) of Bangladesh and the outfit
is said to have a number of bases there. In April 2004, ATTF's
Ranjit Debbarma laid down three pre-conditions for peace talks
with the GOI - migrants into Tripura after 1949 and whose names
did not figure in the voters' list of 1952 should be declared
foreigners; sovereignty should be a point of discussion in the
peace talks; and a representative of the Unrepresented Nations
and Peoples Organization (UNPO) should be present during the
peace talks. These conditions were not accepted and no progress
regarding a peace procedure has been made so far. In recent
years ATTF is believed to have worked in alliance with the ULFA.
However, the outfit's violent activities have declined over the
past year.

D) MANIPUR:

United National Liberation Front (UNLF)

The oldest Meitei insurgent group in Manipur, the UNLF was
founded in 1964 and is led by Rajkumar Meghen. The armed wing
of this outfit is called the Manipur People's Army. The
objective is to establish an independent and socialist Manipur,
a state the UNLF claims was "annexed" by India in 1949. UNLF
leaders established a relationship with the authorities of
erstwhile East Pakistan and underwent military training there in

1969. The UNLF shared good relations with both Pakistan and
China. In June 1975, UNLF leader N. Bisheswar Singh and 16
other Meitei (Manipuri) rebels went to Lhasa to seek Chinese
assistance.

The outfit has an estimated strength of 2,500, with training
camps believed to be in Burma and Bangladesh. In 1990, the UNLF
along with other NE insurgent groups like ULFA, NSCN-K and the
Kuki National Army floated the Indo-Burma Revolutionary Front to
wage a "united struggle for the independence of Indo-Burma."
The outfit has consistently attacked security personnel.

In February 2005, the UNLF mooted a four-point proposal to bring
the Indo-Manipur conflict to an end. The proposal included: a
plebiscite under United Nations supervision to elicit the
opinion of the people of Manipur on the core issue of Manipur's
independence; deployment of a UN peace keeping force in Manipur
to ensure the process is free and fair; surrender of arms by the
UNLF to the UN force, matched with the withdrawal of Indian
troops; and handing over of political power by the UN in
accordance with the results of the plebiscite. These conditions
were unacceptable to the GOI and no progress has been made so
far.

People's Liberation Army (PLA)

The PLA is another Meitei outfit in Manipur with a political
wing, the Revolutionary People's Front (RPF). The PLA was
established under the leadership of N. Bisheswar Singh in
September 1978. Now led by I. Chaoren and running a government
in exile in Bangladesh, the outfit aims at organizing a
revolutionary front covering the entire Northeast and uniting
all ethnic groups, including Meiteis, Nagas and Kukis, to
liberate Manipur. The PLA is believed to have camps in Burma
and Bangladesh. The outfit's estimated strength would be 3,000
and it has targeted security personnel and local political
leaders. It maintains links with the UNLF, PREPAK, as well as
the NSCN-K, ULFA, and the Kachin Independent Army (KIA) of
Burma. The RPF also functions as moral police - it banned the
showing of Hindi films since these allegedly corrupted Manipuri
culture. The outfit also punishes drug traders.

The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK)

PREPAK was formed in 1977 demanding the expulsion of "outsiders"
from the state. Led by Achamba Singh and Tajila, the group has
an estimated cadre strength of 1,000. It is primarily trained
by the NSCN-IM. The PREPAK is part of the Manipur People's
Liberation Front (MPLF),an umbrella organization also including
the UNLF and PLA. Other than the Manipur valley, PREPAK
operates in small areas of Nagaland and Mizoram. It reportedly
received weapons and training from the Kachin Independent Army
(KIA) of Burma and has camps in Bangladesh.

Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup (KYKL)

The KYKL, another Meitei insurgent group, was formed in January

1994. It consisted of breakaway groups from the UNLF, the
PREPAK and the Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP). The outfit
aims at reforming and rebuilding Manipuri society by cleansing
it of immoral activities, drug trade and corruption. The outfit
claims to follow the principle of "all for one and one for all"
with regard to the entire Northeast region. In 2001, the outfit
launched 'Operation New Kangleipak,' an 'anti-corruption'
campaign to 'clean up' the educational system in Manipur. It
also pledged open support to other terrorist groups who
reportedly work against the narcotics trade, drug addiction, and
immoral practices. Led by Namoijam Oken and Achou Toijamba, it
engages widely in extortion and works jointly with the NSCN-IM.
In 2004, the Vice Chancellor of Manipur University N. Bijoy
Singh and Registrar R.K. Ranjan were kidnapped by the KYKL and
later released after being shot in the legs. According to a
KYKL statement, both were punished for flouting rules in the
appointment of a university official. Along with the RPF, the
KYKL has meted out corporal punishment to drug traffickers and
those indulging in other forms of corruption.
E) MEGHALAYA:

Achik National Volunteer Council (ANVC)

The ANVC was formed in December 1995 with the goal of attaining
a homeland for the Garo tribe in the Garo Hills area of
Meghalaya and Kamrup and Goalpara districts of Assam. Led by
Dilash R. Marak, the ANVC is active in the Garo Hills and the
West Khasi Hills of the state. It resorts largely to extortion
and currently works with the ULFA. The ANVC is said to have
some camps in Bangladesh. Incidents of abduction are frequent
and the trading community is often compelled to provide funds.
In July 2004, a cease-fire agreement was signed between the GOI
and the ANVC. A seven member ANVC team signed the agreement in
New Delhi. A ceasefire-monitoring cell and two designated camps
for housing the surrendered militants were set up in the Garo
Hills region. However, the government has accused the ANVC of
violating the ceasefire ground rules while the rebels have
questioned the government's sincerity in starting -- or not
starting - the peace talks. Negotiations for peace are yet to
commence.

Hynniewtrep National Liberation Council (HNLC)

The HNLC was created in 1992 when Meghalaya's first militant
outfit, the Hynniewtrep Achik Liberation Council (HALC),split.
The Hynniewtreps claim to represent the Khasi and Jaintia
tribes, while the Achiks represent the Garos. The HNLC aims at
establishing a state exclusively for Khasis, and free of any
major presence of the Garos. The outfit also intends to evict
outsiders. Led by Julius Dorphang, the HNLC operates primarily
in the Khasi Hills and maintains contact with the NSCN-IM. It
engages in killings and abductions.

Prominent Meghalaya church leader Reverend P.B.M. Basaiawmoit
recently announced that the HNLC has agreed to a ceasefire with
the government. The group has set a pre-condition that talks
should be held outside the country. They also want a formal
invitation either from the Prime Minister or from the Union Home
Minister. However, no concrete progress has yet been made in
the direction of a ceasefire.

F) AND MANY MORE...

The preceding 13 outfits demonstrate something of the intricacy
of insurgency in India's Northeast. However, these are only the
"major" groups. There follows a list of nearly 100 other groups
- most admittedly small and relatively insignificant - that
reveal how truly complex and widespread the phenomenon of
insurgency in the Northeast has become.

Glossary: "Alphabet Soup" by State

Arunachal Pradesh

ADF Arunachal Dragon Force
NLFA National Liberation Front of Arunachal
UPVA United People's Volunteers of Arunachal

Assam

AAASS All Assam Adivasi Suraksha Samiti
ACMF Adivasi Cobra Militant Force
ANCF Adivasi National Commando Force
ASF Adivasi Security Force
ATF Assam Tiger Force
BCF Birsa Commando Force
BVYLF Barak Valley Youth Liberation Force
BLTF Bodo Liberation Tiger Force
BTF Bengali Tiger Force
DHD Dima Halam Daoga
GNF Garo National Front
GTF Gorkha Tiger Force
HLAA Hindu Liberation Army of Assam
ILAA Islamic Liberation Army of Assam
ISS Islamic Sevak Sangh
KLO Kamatapur Liberation Organisation
KNV Karbi National Volunteers
KPF Karbi People's Front
KRLO Koch-Rajbongshi Liberation Organisation
KRPF Koch Rajbongshi Protection Force
MLA Muslim Liberation Army
MLF Muslim Liberation Front
MLTA Muslim Liberation Tigers of Assam
MSCA Muslim Security Council of Assam
MSF Muslim Security Force
MTF Muslim Tiger Force
MULFA Muslim United Liberation Front of Assam
MULTA Muslim United Liberation Tigers of Assam
MVF Muslim Volunteer Force
NDFB Natinal Democratic Front of Bodoland
RMC Revolutionary Muslim Commandos
RNSF Rabha National Security Force
TLAA Tiwa Liberation Army of Assam
TNRF Tiwa National Revolutionary Force
ULFA United Liberation Front of Asom
ULMA United Liberation Militia of Assam
UMLFA United Muslim Liberation Front of Assam
UPDS United People's Democratic Solidarity

Manipur

CKRF Chin Kuki Revolutionary Front
HPC Hmar People's Convention
(Also known as HRF - Hmar Revolutionary Front)
HPC(D) Hmar People's Convention (Democratic)
IKL Iripak Kanba Lup
INF Islamic National Front
IPRA Indigenous People's Revolutionary Alliance
IRF Islamic Revolutionary Front
KCP Kangleipak Communist Party
KDF Kuki Defence Force
KIA Kuki Independent Army
KIF Kuki International Force
KKK Kangleipak Kanba Kanglup
KLF Kuki Liberation Front
KLO Kangleipak Liberation Organisation
KNA Kuki National Army
KNF Kuki National Front
KNV Kuki National Volunteers
KRF Kuki Revolutionary Front
KRPC Kom Rem People's Convention
KSF Kuki Security Force
KYKL Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup
MLTA Manipur Liberation Tiger Army
MPA Manipur People's Army
MPLF Manipur People's Liberation Front
(Unified platform of UNLF, PLA and PREPAK)
PLA Peoples' Liberation Army
PRA People's Republican Army
PREPAK People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak
PULF People's United Liberation Front
RPF Revolutionary People's Front
UKLF United Kuki Liberation Front
UNLF United National Liberation Front
ZRA Zomi Revolutionary Army
ZRV Zomi Revolutionary Volunteers

Meghalaya

ANVC Achik National Volunteers Council
HNLC Hynniewtrep National Liberation Council
PLF-M Peoples' Liberation Front of Meghalaya

Mizoram

BNLF Bru National Liberation Front
HRF Hmar Revolutionary Front

Nagaland
NNC Naga Nationalist Council
NSCN (IM) National Socialist Council of Nagalim (Isak-Muivah)
NSCN (K) National Socialist Council of Nagalim (Khaplang)

Tripura

ATLO All Tripura Liberation Organisation
ATTF All Tripura Tiger Force
BMS Bangla Mukti Sena
BNCT Borok National Council of Tripura
NLFT National Liberation Front of Twipra
TATCF Tripura Armed Tribal Commando Force
TCF Tribal Commando Force
TLF Tripura Liberation Force
TLOF Tripura Liberation Organisation Front
TNA Tripura National Army
TPDF Tripura People's Democratic Front
TSV Tripura State Volunteers

SIPDIS
TTDF Tripura Tribal Democratic Force
TTVF Tripura Tribal Volunteer Force
UBLF United Bengali Liberation Front

SIBLEY