Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05BRASILIA3262
2005-12-14 19:43:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Brasilia
Cable title:  

BRAZIL'S CONGRESS CONTINUES TO DELIBERATE

Tags:  ETRD PGOV BR 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

141943Z Dec 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 003262 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC, WHA/EPSC
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC/JANDERSEM/ADRISCOLL/MWAR D
USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USCS/OIO/WH/RD/DDEVITO/DANDERSON/EOL SON
USDA FOR JB PENN, U/S, FFAS
NSC FOR SCRONIN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD PGOV BR
SUBJECT: BRAZIL'S CONGRESS CONTINUES TO DELIBERATE
PARAMETERS FOR TRADE NEGOTIATORS

REF: A) BRASILIA 3185 B) 03 BRASILIA 2967

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 003262

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC, WHA/EPSC
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC/JANDERSEM/ADRISCOLL/MWAR D
USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USCS/OIO/WH/RD/DDEVITO/DANDERSON/EOL SON
USDA FOR JB PENN, U/S, FFAS
NSC FOR SCRONIN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD PGOV BR
SUBJECT: BRAZIL'S CONGRESS CONTINUES TO DELIBERATE
PARAMETERS FOR TRADE NEGOTIATORS

REF: A) BRASILIA 3185 B) 03 BRASILIA 2967


1. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED


2. (SBU) Summary. In a bid to exert greater control over
trade policy, Brazil's Congress continues to weigh
legislation to establish parameters for the country's trade
negotiators. While some provisions would pose challenges for
the U.S., it is unclear whether final passage will be in a
timely fashion and if so, to what extent Brazilian
negotiators would actually be bound by its provisions. Post
is sending this follow-up report given recent movement of the
legislation in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and mention
of the pending legislation by local deputies during Codel
Hyde's visit to Brasilia in early December. End Summary.


3. (SBU) Brazilian legislators continue to evince an
interest in exerting greater influence over the country's
trade policy. They are increasingly present as part of
Brazil's official negotiating delegations, including for the
WTO Hong Kong Ministerial, and have sought to keep alive
draft legislation to define parameters for trade negotiators.
The bill was mentioned by Brazilian Congressional leaders in
conversations with Codel Hyde on December 2 (ref A).


4. (U) The legislation currently under review in the
Chamber of Deputies was initially conceived in 2003 in the
midst of the contentious debate in the hemisphere over the
future of FTAA negotiations, and has since continued to
slowly wind its way through Congress. As reported in ref B,
the bill is the brainchild of Sao Paulo Senator Suplicy (PT),
former chair of the Senate Foreign Relations and National
Defense Committee, although it was significantly cleaned up
by the bill's rapporteur Senator Marcelo Crivella (PMR)
before clearing the Senate in October 2004. On November 30,
2005, the Chamber of Deputies' Committee for Economic
Development, Industry and Trade approved the bill, now PL
4291/2004, without amendment, before passing it to the
Chamber's Foreign Relations and National Defense Committee.
The bill will also have to clear the Chamber's Constitution
and Justice Committee before gaining final approval by the
Chamber.



5. (U) Although the local press refers to the bill as
Brazil's TPA-like legislation, it varies markedly from U.S.
Trade Promotion Authority. The Brazilian legislation is
designed to provide some general guidance to negotiators so
they may have a sense of Congress' disposition on certain
issues, but it's provisions are not binding on negotiators,
nor is Congress bound to use an abbreviated or expedited
approval process should negotiators conform with its
guidance. There is no provision for an up or down vote, thus
leaving intact the Brazilian legislature's ability to press
the executive branch for changes after the negotiation's
conclusion. The proposed legislation applies to all of
Brazil's trade negotiations, including intra-Mercosul
discussions, and has no expiration date.


6. (SBU) The bill lays out some straightforward objectives
for negotiators, such as expanding Brazil's export markets
and productive sectors and shifting the composition of
Brazil's exports toward greater value-added products. It
also identifies some specific outcomes negotiators should aim
for, which in an FTAA or bilateral context would pose
challenges for the U.S., including the confinement of issues
described as systemic or regulatory, such as IPR, government
procurement, investment and services, to the WTO, Mercosul or
negotiations with other developing countries; rejection of
commitments on labor and environment; equal treatment of all
four modes in services negotiations; elimination of the
excessive use of antidumping and countervailing duty laws;
and apparent rejection of investor-state provisions. The
bill also prompts negotiators to preserve Brazil's right
within GATT provisions to treatment as a developing country
for the purposes of infant industry protection and cases of
balance of payment problems, and in securing special and
differential treatment broadly. Consistent with the GoB's
current negotiating stance, negotiators are tasked with
seeking the accelerated reduction/elimination of export and
production subsidies for agricultural products. While
negotiators are directed to seek commitments for restraining
the exportation of counterfeit goods, they are also tasked
with seeking protection for phyto-genetic resources and
securing proper compensation for there commercial use.

Comment
--------------


7. (SBU) Although the bill's recent approval by the
Economic Development,Industry and Trade Committee, after one
year of deliberation, signals a continuing interest in the
project, it is less than clear that it will gain final
approval in a timely fashion given the other matters
preoccupying the Chamber, or that once passed it would impact
significantly Brazil's negotiations with the United States in
the context of the WTO or elsewhere. The bill is not very
well-written and a number of provisions seem to reflect the
less-than-full understanding that many Brazilian
Congressional members have of technical trade issues. The
rather open introductory language extolling negotiators "to
aim" for certain outcomes, would also seem to give the
Foreign Ministry significant leeway should it choose to use
it. Nonetheless, former Ambassador to the United States
Rubens Barbosa recently criticized what he characterized as
the Brazilian Legislature's attempt to duplicate the control
exercised by the U.S. Congress over trade matters by shifting
responsibility for trade negotiations from the Executive to
the Congress, a move he said is inconsistent with Brazil's
Constitution. Criticism notwithstanding, Brazil's Congress
likely sees the bill as an important vehicle if not to
pre-determine negotiating outcomes, at least to force
Brazilian negotiators to consult more frequently and in more
depth than past tradition, in order to secure eventual
approval of future trade accords. Post will continue to
monitor the bill's progress.
Chicola