Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05BRASILIA1696
2005-06-24 20:06:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Brasilia
Cable title:  

BRAZIL: SUBMISSION FOR INVESTMENT DISPUTES AND

Tags:  EINV ENRG EFIN OPIC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 001696

SIPDIS

EB/IFD/OIA/JPROSELI
L/CID/JNICOL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV ENRG EFIN OPIC
SUBJECT: BRAZIL: SUBMISSION FOR INVESTMENT DISPUTES AND
EXPROPRIATION REPORT

REF: SECSTATE 70014

The U.S. Mission in Brazil submits the following two (2)
claims per Reftel for inclusion in the 2005 Section 527
Report on investment disputes and expropriation claims.

Claim 1
--------------

a. Claimants A and B
b. 1999
c. Claimants A and B, along with a Brazilian partner,
through a joint venture (JV),purchased 33 percent of the
voting shares of the electric power company CEMIG from the
state of Minas Gerais, for US$1.05 billion in 1997. The
acquisition was made through a public auction promoted by
the national development bank (BNDES). The purchase price
included a Shareholders Agreement that the purchasers
executed with the state of Minas Gerais, giving the JV
certain negative control (i.e., veto) rights over the
management of CEMIG and the ability to nominate some of the
executive officers. However, in 1999, a new state
government took office and challenged the validity of the
Shareholders Agreement in a suit filed in a lower state
court, which overturned the Shareholders Agreement. This
left the JV with a 33% ownership stake but no influence over
the management of the company. In 2001, the Appellate Court
of Minas Gerais rejected the JV's appeal and sought to deny
the JV access to the Brazilian federal Superior Court and
Supreme Court of Justice, where the JV has further appealed
the decision. Those appeals remain pending.

According to the Claimants, the shares alone, in the absence
of a Shareholders Agreement, were worth no more than US$400
million. According to the Claimants, the difference in
value between purchase price of the JV's shares in CEMIG and
the value stripped of the negative control rights
approximates the outstanding balance (US$700 million) of a
loan extended to the JV by BNDES to finance the share
purchase. Although BNDES rescheduled that loan, the JV
subsequently went into default on this loan. The JV is in
negotiations with BNDES on ways to settle the outstanding
debt.

U.S. Mission officials repeatedly raised the dispute with
senior GOB officials until the case went to court. The GOB
said there was little it could do to assist in resolving the
dispute because the case is pending in Brazil's judiciary.

Claim 2
--------------

a. Claimant C
b. 2003
c. In 1998, the State of Parana auctioned off a 40% voting
interest in the state's sanitation utility, Sanepar. To
induce private investors to provide the needed equity
capital, the state offered the winning bidder a 15-year
"Shareholders Agreement" that guaranteed certain customary
minority shareholder protections as well as provided the
investors a limited operating role through the appointment
of three of the seven executive officers of Sanepar. A
consortium of investors purchased the Sanepar stake.
Claimant C holds an indirect US$18 million indirect stake in
the consortium. A Joint Venture between a Spanish and a
French company also invested in Sanepar through this
consortium.

In February 2003, the new Parana state governor, Robert
Requiao, unilaterally terminated the Shareholders Agreement
and subsequently replaced two of the three Sanepar executive
officers that the investment consortium had the right to
appoint. Having effectively achieved ownership and
management control of Sanepar, Governor Requiao also amended
the company By-Laws without approval of the minority board
members and undertook a debt-for-equity swap with the state
government that diluted the minority shareholders' stakes.
Following the annulment of the Shareholder's Agreement, the
French company sold its interest in the company to its
Spanish JV partner. The JV has fought the state
government's actions in the courts, which have not yet ruled
definitively on the case.

U.S. Embassy officials have met with Brazilian officials to
discuss the case, but the GOB said it couldn't offer any
assistance. The U.S. Ambassador at the time the dispute
arose also raised the case with Requiao, but Requiao
defended the new management controls.

List of Claimants
--------------

Claimant A: Mirant (known as Southern Electric at the time
of the purchase)
Claimant B: AES
Claimant C: Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC),
through credit to the Global Environmental Emerging Markets
Fund II (GEEMF II)

DANILOVICH