Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05BOGOTA2728
2005-03-23 21:44:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Bogota
Cable title:  

COLOMBIA: COCA CULTIVATION ESTIMATES

Tags:  SNAR KCRM PTER CO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 002728 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED

DEPT FOR INL, WHA/AND

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SNAR KCRM PTER CO
SUBJECT: COLOMBIA: COCA CULTIVATION ESTIMATES

Ref: A) Lima 1288 B) USGAO Report GAO 03-319R Drug Control:
Coca Cultivation and Eradication Estimates in Colombia

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 002728

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED

DEPT FOR INL, WHA/AND

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SNAR KCRM PTER CO
SUBJECT: COLOMBIA: COCA CULTIVATION ESTIMATES

Ref: A) Lima 1288 B) USGAO Report GAO 03-319R Drug Control:
Coca Cultivation and Eradication Estimates in Colombia


1. (SBU) Summary: The geographic expanse of Colombia,
adverse meteorological conditions, relocation of cultivation
to non-traditional growing areas, and the lag between the
capture of overhead imagery and analysis combine to
frustrate the estimation of coca cultivation in Colombia.
Estimates provided by the Crime and Narcotics Center (CNC)
are useful as a point of departure for gathering more
focused imagery that is the basis for aerial eradication
mission planning. However, as "official" estimates of the
quantity of coca under cultivation and, by extension,
Colombia's cocaine production potential, CNC estimates are
subject to misinterpretation and misuse that undermine the
tenuous political base of our eradication program. End
summary.


2. (SBU) The USG's official estimates of coca and opium
poppy cultivation in Colombia (and elsewhere - see ref B),
as compiled by the Crime and Narcotics Center (CNC),are
politically controversial. The surveys undertaken are
indicative of probable cultivations, but as a measure of
actual coca under cultivation these estimates are of
questionable practical value (Ref B). CNC's indications are
analyzed locally and used as the basis for focused
overflights by intelligence aircraft equipped with Multi-
spectral digital Imaging System (MDIS) equipment. The
detailed and extensive imagery collected by MDIS aircraft is
then analyzed and used to map out specific aerial
eradication missions.


3. (SBU) In compiling its estimates, CNC primarily targets
areas of known cultivation - the traditional growing areas.
We have found, however, that the illicit narcotics
cultivation industry often relocates new fields to areas
less subject to detection/eradication, i.e., to non-
traditional growing areas and/or to areas where
meteorological conditions make detection and eradication via
aerial spray operations more difficult. For example, in
recent years we have detected significant coca cultivations
in Colombia's national parks and protected indigenous areas
where aerial spraying is not currently authorized. Because
we have not sprayed there, CNC has not previously included
these areas in its surveys and most of the coca there was
not included in CNC estimates. On the basis of our
observations we estimate that these areas probably contain
as much as 10 percent of all coca under cultivation in
Colombia.


4. (SBU) In response to our requests, CNC included selected
national parks in the 2004 survey. So while much of this
coca certainly existed prior to 2004, its inclusion in the
2004 survey results in a direct increase in official
estimates of total area under cultivation. To a large
extent, where you find coca and how much you find depends on
where you look. Capturing "new" coca in official surveys
does not mean that there is more coca, only that more coca
is detected and included in official estimates.


5. (SBU) As noted, the CNC's indications of significant
amounts of coca are a useful basis upon which to conduct
more detailed imagery gathering and analysis. But as a
basis for estimating the actual amount of coca present in
any region or the country as a whole, CNC estimates have
little practical value. For example, for 2003 the CNC
estimated there were 5700 hectares of coca in Narino
Department, though we ultimately sprayed in excess of 31,000
hectares there. In the 2004 Colombia Presentation the CNC
indicates 6900 hectares under cultivation in Narino, though
since January 1 we have already sprayed over 39,000 hectares
and have missions planned to spray even more. Such
disparities are in part a reflection of CNC's sampling
techniques and inability to adjust data to incorporate the
ongoing results of a dynamic aerial eradication program.
But differences so profound inevitably call into question
the underlying methodology and objectives of CNC's
estimation techniques. As the basis for projections of
Colombia's cocaine production potential, CNC data have
almost no practical value.


6. (SBU) Comment: Not all aspects of the organization and
functioning of the illicit narcotics industry are well
understood. Official estimates of cultivation, eradication,
interdiction, etc, are examined closely. Several interests
seize upon every opportunity to "prove" the inefficiency,
ineffectiveness, and overall futility of our eradication
program. CNC cultivation estimates for specific regions and
our actual spray results are but two data points employed in
the development of what we view as a highly effective
eradication program. In the absence of a more complete
context, the discrepancies between these data can be held up
as evidence of a lack of scientific basis for our
eradication program. End comment.

WOOD