Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05BOGOTA2650
2005-03-22 18:35:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bogota
Cable title:  

UNHCHR FRUHLING DISCUSSES HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT WITH

Tags:  PHUM PINR PREL CO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 002650 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/18/2015
TAGS: PHUM PINR PREL CO
SUBJECT: UNHCHR FRUHLING DISCUSSES HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT WITH
DIPLOMATIC COMMUNITY

REF: A. BOGOTA 2564

B. BOGOTA 1958

Classified By: Ambassador William B. Wood Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

-------
Summary
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 002650

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/18/2015
TAGS: PHUM PINR PREL CO
SUBJECT: UNHCHR FRUHLING DISCUSSES HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT WITH
DIPLOMATIC COMMUNITY

REF: A. BOGOTA 2564

B. BOGOTA 1958

Classified By: Ambassador William B. Wood Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

--------------
Summary
--------------


1. (C) On March 18, Michael Fruhling, Director of the
Colombia Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights (UNHCHR) briefed the diplomatic community on his
recently released report on the human rights situation in
Colombia. Fruhling gave a brief overview of the report and
recommendations, and also discussed the UN's input (at GOC
request) into the demobilization law currently before the
Colombian Congress. Post believes that the report will be
cited by some members of the EU to toughen the chair
statement on Colombia at the Commission on Human Rights (CHR)
next month. End summary.

--------------
Discussion of UNHCHR Report
--------------


2. (U) On March 18, Michael Fruhling, Director of the
Colombia Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights (UNHCHR),met with the diplomatic community to
discuss the UNHCHR,s 2004 human rights report, publicly
released on March 11. As reported in Ref A, the report
describes the human rights situation as "critical" due to
continued allegations of extrajudicial killings, torture, and
arbitrary detentions committed by state security forces.
Violations of international humanitarian law, particularly by
the FARC and paramilitaries, also continued in 2004. On the
recommendations, Fruhling noted the results for 2004 were
"mixed and varied," and that the High Commissioner had issued
another 27 recommendations for 2005.


3. (C) In response to a question from the Argentine
representative on differences between the 2003 and 2004
reports, Fruhling spoke primarily of the need for the
development of a system of public statistics that adequately
covers human rights violations and breaches of international
humanitarian law, including violations by the security forces
(refs A and B). Regarding the demobilization law, Fruhling
stressed that the High Commissioner continues to call for a
law that guarantees the rights to truth, justice and
reparation for victims, and ensures there will be no impunity
for perpetrators of crimes against humanity and war crimes.




4. (C) Embassy Polcouns raised some concerns with the report,
which appeared to move the UN away from a neutral observer.
Among other things, he questioned whether it was germane to
include a discussion of the re-election debate in the text;
the erroneous implication was that if the GOC had spent less
time on this issue, the human rights situation would be
better. He questioned why there was only a brief reference
to the new accusatory system, a fundamental and positive
reform in the judicial system. He noted that the report's
description of the problems created in the application of
international humanitarian law by the GOC refusing to use the
term "internal armed conflict" had been publicly disputed by
the International Committee for the Red Cross (ICRC).
Similarly, the report's reference to "high levels of torture"
committed by the security forces (only one example of
mistreatment provided in the text) had also been disputed
albeit privately by the ICRC. The UNHCHR was talking to NGOs
about incidents of torture and the ICRC was talking to actual
victims. As well, the report's characterization of the
status of the paramilitaries in the country was subject to
interpretation and should not have been presented as fact.
Fruhling took note of the comments but insisted that his
office takes no political stance and merely reports what it
sees happening in the country.

--------------
Legal Framework for Peace Process
--------------


5. (C) Fruhling also discussed the ongoing debate regarding a
legal framework for the peace process. He noted that an
adequate framework must offer certain incentives and judicial
benefits for demobilized combatants and would not result in
impunity for those who have committed grave violations of
human rights. The framework, which would be used for all
future peace processes in Colombia, must also guarantee
truth, justice and reparations for victims. Fruhling added
that the UN has provided technical advice to the GOC on the
drafting of the latest versions of the law, and some of their
suggestions have been included. He also noted that Colombia
has the chance to design and create a legal framework that
could be used in future related situations.


6. (C) The British Ambassador said that civil society needs
to participate in the creation and adoption of this law, as
occurred in Northern Ireland where a referendum was held. He
added that Colombian citizens are the only ones who can
decide what the "price for peace" is, and this decision must
then be accepted by the international community. Fruhling
agreed, adding that the UN office is available to provide
assistance and advice to GOC on international law and
standards. The Peruvian Ambassador raised the issue of
individual confessions, noting they had had been used
successfully in Peru. Fruhling responded that the UN was not
against individual confessions, but the law needed to have a
collective context. On extradition, Fruhling said this was
one of the positive effects of globalization, and it was
important the extradition existed. On the International
Criminal Court (ICC),he noted the ICC's jurisdiction is only
complementary to local justice, it does not replace it.

--------------
Comment
--------------


7. (C) The report will be used as ammunition by certain
members of the G-24, especially Canada, France and Sweden, to
toughen up the soon-to-be-drafted chair's statement on
Colombia at the Commission on Human Rights. Bogota-based
representatives from these countries have told us they are
coming under increasing pressure by their NGO communities to
"remedy" in Geneva the "weak" and "pro-GOC" Cartagena
Declaration released February 3 at the international donors
conference for Colombia.
WOOD