Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05BOGOTA1929
2005-03-01 20:07:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Bogota
Cable title:  

GOC FIRES LEAD IPR NEGOTIATOR FOR THE FTA

Tags:  ECON ETRD KIPR CO FTA 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS BOGOTA 001929 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE PASS TO USTR - BRIAN PECK, BENNETT HARMAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR CO FTA
SUBJECT: GOC FIRES LEAD IPR NEGOTIATOR FOR THE FTA


Sensitive but Unclassified --please protect accordingly.

UNCLAS BOGOTA 001929

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE PASS TO USTR - BRIAN PECK, BENNETT HARMAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR CO FTA
SUBJECT: GOC FIRES LEAD IPR NEGOTIATOR FOR THE FTA


Sensitive but Unclassified --please protect accordingly.


1. (SBU) On February 24 Commerce Minister Botero and FTA
chief negotiator Gomez announced that the GOC removed
Colombia's lead intellectual property negotiator, Luis Angel
Madrid. Javier Gamboa, Madrid's deputy, will now lead the
Colombian IP team. Botero and Gomez fired Madrid after
finding out late Wednesday, February 23 that the intellectual
property negotiating team had inserted unapproved language in
a joint Ecuadoran-Colombian data protection proposal during
the seventh round of the FTA in Cartagena. Madrid, without
the knowledge and approval of the GOC and the Colombian
private sector, inserted text in the proposal that would
allow Colombia to retain its current data protection regime,
contained in decree 2085, during the proposed transition
period (through 2014). Ecuador agreed to Madrid's proposal
as Ecuador has no data protection in place and would not be
affected by the addition. Madrid also failed to brief the
Colombian government on his actions, and they only became
clear during a presentation to private sector advisors on the
actions taken at the Cartagena round on February 23.


2. (SBU) The local Colombian pharmaceutical sector, whose
leaders have long claimed that the GOC was negotiating behind
the back of the private sector, took this action as proof of
their worst suspicions. The president of ASINFAR
(Association of Colombian Pharmaceutical Industries),Alberto
Bravo, was particularly upset by Madrid,s unilateral action
and publicly called for the Minister's and Gomez's
resignations. The rest of the private sector also saw
Madrid's action as a negative precedent and one that
undermined the GOC's credibility in the negotiations. Hoping
to stem this erosion of confidence, Minister Botero
immediately called for Madrid's removal. The move seems to
have worked and the private sector has accepted the GOC's
explanation and praised the Minister's rapid resolution of
the problem. Colombia and Ecuador are now working on a new
proposal, which will reportedly contain no provision for
Colombia to retain its current level of protection through
the proposed transition period.


3. (SBU) According to FTA chief negotiator Gomez, the real
problem with the proposal was in form not substance. The GOC
wanted to insert language that would allow it to maintain
current protections, but could not gain the private sector's
support at this time. The GOC was lobbying the local
companies and hoped to obtain their approval by the next full
round of negotiations in April in Lima. Gomez now fears that
it will be much more difficult to obtain the local industry's
approval for such a proposal. Moreover, the episode has
strengthened the hand of those in the GOC, particularly in
the Ministry of Social Protection, who wish to weaken current
data protection standards. Gomez now feels that he faces an
even more difficult fight on IP, one of the most sensitive
areas of the FTA negotiations. Gomez also highlighted that
this episode underscores how closely the private sector is
watching developments during the FTA negotiations and the
need for full transparency in the process.
WOOD