Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ANKARA94
2005-01-06 16:12:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

TURK TELEKOM: FROM MONOPOLY TO COMPETITION

Tags:  ECPS EINV TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000094 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/SE, EB/IFD, AND EB/CIP
TREASURY FOR RADKINS AND MMILLS
USDOC FOR 4212/ITA/MAC/CPD/DDEFALCO

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS EINV TU
SUBJECT: TURK TELEKOM: FROM MONOPOLY TO COMPETITION

REF: A) 04 Ankara 6484
B) 04 Ankara 6673

Sensitive But Unclassified. Please handle accordingly.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000094

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/SE, EB/IFD, AND EB/CIP
TREASURY FOR RADKINS AND MMILLS
USDOC FOR 4212/ITA/MAC/CPD/DDEFALCO

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS EINV TU
SUBJECT: TURK TELEKOM: FROM MONOPOLY TO COMPETITION

REF: A) 04 Ankara 6484
B) 04 Ankara 6673

Sensitive But Unclassified. Please handle accordingly.


1. (SBU) Summary. State telecommunications monopoly Turk
Telekom (TT) has been taking steps to maintain its
dominance in Turkey's newly liberalizing telecom market,
including by making significant investment in new
technology in order to strengthen its "natural monopoly"
position in the market. TT Management hopes its
extensive network infrastructure - in combination with
consistent profitability - will be attractive for
potential buyers. End Summary.


2. (SBU) On December 2, Turk Telekom (TT) General Manager
Mehmet Ekinalan briefed us on the company's activities
and privatization prospects. Ekinalan pointed out that
TT was a profitable company, despite its requirement to
invest and provide service in unprofitable areas as a
state service provider. Ekinalan said TT received 50% of
its revenues from only 10% of its subscribers, those
residing in big cities.


3. (SBU) Ekinalan expressed full support for TT's
privatization, emphasizing that he could not manage a
business in a competitive and consumer oriented
environment with the bureaucratic constraints of being
directly part of a government ministry. The GM was
optimistic about TT's prospects for privatization, since
he thought this was the first time the GOT was fully
committed to privatize the company. Ekinalan noted that
TT had achieved USD 6.5 billion turnover in 2003, and
recorded USD 1 billion net profit. Given these figures,
Ekinalan thought it would not be difficult for a
prospective buyer to calculate the value of TT. Ekinalan
said the GOT would like to see TT remain as an active,
competitive (read, dominant) operator in Turkey in the
long term.


4. (SBU) Ekinalan described TT's extensive fiber cable
investment in Turkey, reaching as far as small villages.
He pointed out the capacity of such infrastructure to
support other networks and technology, such as cable TV
and ADSL high speed internet, further strengthening TT's
natural monopoly position. With respect to TT's
international connection, Ekinalan mentioned a new cable
linkage recently made to Italy through Greece, raising
the company's high speed internet capacity and
connectivity for its customers. The GM admitted that it
would be hard for newcomers to compete with TT in some
areas, noting that it would require a considerable amount
of investment and patience. Ekinalin claimed that he
supported liberalization and competition, but stressed
that it must be fair and give consideration to past
investment and mandates for service for smaller towns.


5. (SBU) Ekinalan also responded to the criticism by
private telecom companies newly entering the long-
distance market on TT's high interconnection fees.
Ekinalan said the companies' expectations were
unrealistic: they expected to make profits without making
any investments. The TT GM claimed TT's infrastructure
investments (USD 500 million this year, for example)
justified the interconnection fees, and said the fees in
Turkey could not be directly compared to those in EU
countries. Ekinalan noted that EU countries used a fixed
fee structure, which enabled the telecom provider to keep
interconnection fees low. In any case, Ekinalan expected
the interconnection fee problem to be resolved soon,
asserting that TT had reached an agreement with 20 of the
40 companies that received telecom operator licenses
earlier in 2004.


6. (SBU) Comment: Turk Telekom's management will continue
to take advantage of its entrenched monopoly position for
as long as it can. Potential investors in TT will expect
that dominant position to endure; i.e., achieving
privatization/liberalization as practiced in many
European countries where the privatized national operator
maintains a dominant market share. This may delay broad
telecom market diversification and limit new companies
entering the market. In the meantime, many factors will
continue to delay TT's privatization, no matter how
committed management and (some in) the GOT (reftels).
End Comment.

Edelman