Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ANKARA356
2005-01-20 14:45:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

AFGHANISTAN: TURKEY MODIFIES ITS PRT STANCE

Tags:  MARR PREL PGOV TU AF UK 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 000356 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/19/2030
TAGS: MARR PREL PGOV TU AF UK
SUBJECT: AFGHANISTAN: TURKEY MODIFIES ITS PRT STANCE

REF: ANKARA 353

Classified By: PolMil Counselor Timothy A. Betts for reasons 1.4 (b) an
d (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 000356

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/19/2030
TAGS: MARR PREL PGOV TU AF UK
SUBJECT: AFGHANISTAN: TURKEY MODIFIES ITS PRT STANCE

REF: ANKARA 353

Classified By: PolMil Counselor Timothy A. Betts for reasons 1.4 (b) an
d (d)


1. (C) Late January 19, MFA South Asia DDG Aydin Evirgen told
PolMilCouns that, after further consideration "at high
levels," Turkey was modifying its position on participating
in PRTs in Afghanistan from that which he conveyed to us on
January 18 (reftel). He said the Turkish General Staff (TGS)
had been authorized to offer a Turkish contribution to the
Italian-led PRT in Harat at the NATO force generation
conference on January 20. Evirgen said that this
contribution would be "an alternative" to taking over the
British PRT at Mazar-e Sharif, but the Turkish representative
at the Jan. 20 meeting would not address the Mazar option as
Ankara preferred to wait to hear the USG thoughts on it.
PolMilCouns welcomed this message, noting that he had heard
informally that HMG may have already found others to take
over Mazar. When pressed as to whether the two options --
contributing to Harat or leading in Mazar -- were mutually
exclusive, Evirgen allowed that in the event both
contributions were desired, the GOT would consider them. For
now, however, the decision was one or the other.


2. (C) Comment: This is the first hint that Turkey is
prepared to participation in Stage 2 expansion of ISAF. We
defer to USNATO on the merits of this new proposal in meeting
ISAF force requirements. From the perspective of encouraging
greater Turkish participation in ISAF, however, we should
capitalize on this sudden change of heart if we can. End
comment.


3. (U) Kabul minimize considered.
EDELMAN