Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ANKARA2891
2005-05-20 15:19:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

AEGEAN: TURKEY MULLS NO LONGER FILING FLIGHT

Tags:  MARR PREL TU GR NATO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 002891 

SIPDIS

NOFORN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/19/2015
TAGS: MARR PREL TU GR NATO
SUBJECT: AEGEAN: TURKEY MULLS NO LONGER FILING FLIGHT
INFORMATION WITH NATO

REF: A. ANKARA 2730


B. ANKARA 1900

C. ATHENS 1068

Classified By: Ambassador Eric S. Edelman for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

Summary
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 002891

SIPDIS

NOFORN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/19/2015
TAGS: MARR PREL TU GR NATO
SUBJECT: AEGEAN: TURKEY MULLS NO LONGER FILING FLIGHT
INFORMATION WITH NATO

REF: A. ANKARA 2730


B. ANKARA 1900

C. ATHENS 1068

Classified By: Ambassador Eric S. Edelman for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

Summary
--------------


1. (C/NF) Turkey is considering ceasing filing flight
information with NATO for military flights over the Aegean,
an MFA official told us May 20. TGS contacts confirm this.
Mounting Turkish frustration with Greece's public relations
and diplomatic efforts to paint the Turks as
aggressors--along with what Turkey views as a lack of
reciprocal confidence building measures from Athens--are
making it difficult for Turkey "to sustain" its filing
policy. We believe the Turkish Air Force is probably also
feeling bottom-up pressure from pilots because Greek pilots
are forewarned of their entry to the air over the Aegean and
thus have an advantage in mock dogfights. Additionally, both
military and civilian Turks are increasingly angry with both
Greece and the EU overall. If Greece cannot make a minimal
gesture to reduce tensions, we believe the Turks will before
too long pull the plug on its filing policy, despite the
consequences. End summary.

NATO Filings: Advantage, Greece
--------------


2. (C/NF) PolMilCouns and PolMilOff called on MFA Deputy
Director General for Maritime and Aviation Affairs Vakur
Gokdenizler on May 20 to discuss Aegean issues. Gokdenizler
briefly reviewed the GOT's long-standing position on its
dispute with Greece on the Aegean, then moved quickly to the
issue of filing flight information with NATO. Since 2001,
the Turkish military has filed daily flight schedules (DFS)
with NATO, including the date and time of the flight, number
of aircraft, and the general area of entry into the Athens
flight information region (FIR). Gokdenizler pointed out
that there are only four general corridors of entry, meaning
that the Hellenic Air Force knows where Turkish flights are
entering at all times.


3. (C/NF) Gokdenizler reported that "there is serious
disagreement" within the GOT on whether this practice "can be
sustained." (NOTE: TGS J-5 Greece/Cyprus Chief RADM

Sislioglu had told PolMilCouns May 11 that the Turkish
military was considering no longer filing flight information
with NATO, but that he anticipated MFA would oppose such a
move (ref a). END NOTE.) There is increasing frustration
among many in the GOT that Turkey took this CBM in 2001 but
that Greece, in Turkey's view, has done nothing in return.
He cited continuing Greek diplomatic pressure within the EU
and as far afield as South Africa, wherein Greek diplomats
try to convince sometimes non-savvy interlocutors that Turkey
is routinely violating sovereign Greek airspace. He also
noted that the Turkish Air Force--from the pilots on up the
chain--is frustrated because the Greek pilots know exactly
when and where Turkish planes are entering the FIR, giving
the Greek pilots an unfair advantage in mock dogfights.
Gokdenizler implied that the GOT was not ready to take this
decision immediately, but that it might in the
non-too-distant future absent any gesture from Greece. "It
is not possible to sustain this forever," he said.

Weary of Date-Driven Diplomacy
--------------


4. (C/NF) Gokdenizler reported that in fact the GOT has been
mulling making this move for the past two years, but that
"there is always another date" looming where doing so could
damage Turkey's image: first the 2004 Greek elections, then
the Cyprus referendum, then the 2004 Summer Olympics, then
the Dec. 17, 2004 EU decision on whether to begin accession
talks with Turkey, and now Oct. 3 of this year, when the EU
talks are scheduled to begin. Gokdenizler implied that
Turkish policymakers see no end to such key dates, but that
they may soon be ready to risk the fallout ending the
schedule filing might make anyway.

PolMilCouns to Turks: Think Carefully
--------------

5. (C/NF) PolMilCouns responded that Turkey should think
carefully before it withdraws a CBM such as this one
unilaterally. The Greeks do not appear to have deviated
substantively from their Aegean policy and practices for at
least the past decade. The United States agrees that "FIR
violations" by state aircraft are a Greek myth, and that the
Greek claim of four additional nautical miles of national
airspace beyond its six NM of territorial waters is
groundless. Yet for Turkey to cease filing flight
information with NATO at this time will only serve to give
the Greeks ammunition in their diplomatic and public
relations efforts to paint Turkey as a sinister force in the
international community. Turkey recently worked hard and
successfully to improve its image, for example on Cyprus, but
to take a step backward now when the Greeks have not done so
could help undo all this work.


6. (C/NF) Moreover, PolMilCouns pointed out, while the
current status quo may be an annoyance to Turkey, ceasing to
file plans could increase the odds of an accident. If the
Greeks no longer know when and where the Turks are coming,
they will have to scramble jets and otherwise act with more
haste and urgency than now. If the Greeks try to hurry in
order to intercept Turkish planes before they leave the
Athens FIR, for example, this might create a riskier
environment.

What Can Athens Do?
--------------


7. (C/NF) Gokdenizler took these points, and noted two
possible Greek courses of action which he believed would head
off Turkey ceasing to file flight information:

--The Greeks could cease tagging Turkish planes as "x-rays"
(or enemies),and/or
--Greece could stop intercepting flights entering the Athens
FIR, even if the Greeks were to continue to intercept Turkish
plans within 10 NM of Greek territory.

These or some other step by Greece could strengthen the hand
of those in the GOT who support continuing flight schedule
filing. He asked if the U.S. would be willing to discuss
this issue in general terms (not disclosing Turkish policy
thinking) with the Greeks and seek "a single goodwill
gesture" from them. PolMilCouns was non-committal.
Gokdenizler would not say whether Turkey has raised this yet
directly with the Greeks, stating it was too early in the
Turkish decision-making process on DFS. (NOTE: Even if
Turkey ceases to file DFS, Gokdenizler said TAF planes would
still signal their presence ("squawk IFF") to the Greeks upon
entering the Athens FIR. END NOTE.)

Comment: Saving Ankara from Itself?
--------------


8. (C/NF) Gokdenizler could not provide a comprehensive
answer when we asked why Turkey might now feel it necessary
to cease filing flight information with NATO. We believe,
however, that the frustration he cited goes both up and down
the Turkish civilian and military chains of command. Turkish
Air Force (TAF) pilots are probably tired of Greek pilots
always having the upper hand because they know ahead of time
when and where TAF planes will enter the Athens FIR; this
likely increases grassroots pressure on TAF commanders.
Additionally, senior Turks are angry at Greece and the entire
European Union for a variety of reasons: the EU has been
wrapped around the axle in providing trade and aid for the
Turkish Cypriots despite its promises to do so after the
failed April 2004 Cyprus referendum, Turkey senses increasing
European unwillingness to accept Turkey as a full member, and
the recent European Court of Human Rights' recent decision
that the Abdullah Ocalan trial was unfair has only raised the
heat more. With nationalism and anti-EU sentiment on the
rise, it is harder for Turkish policymakers to sustain what
they perceive as an unrequited CBM in the Aegean.


9. (C/NF) The question is: What do we do about it, if
anything? Gokdenizler made it plain, however, that he hopes
the Greeks could make a gesture--no matter how small--to
strengthen his hand in lowering Turkish frustration and
pulling back from not filing with NATO. We plan to continue
quietly urging the Turks not to take a unilateral step
backwards, but absent a gesture from Greece expect Turkish
policymakers will make a regrettable decision.
EDELMAN