Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05AMMAN8284
2005-10-20 04:58:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

MEDIA REACTION ON IRAQ

Tags:  KMDR JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 AMMAN 008284

SIPDIS

STATE FOR NEA/ARN, NEA/PA, NEA/AIA, INR/NESA, R/MR,
I/GNEA, B/BXN, B/BRN, NEA/PPD, NEA/IPA FOR ALTERMAN
USAID/ANE/MEA
LONDON FOR TSOU

E.O. 12958: N/A

TAGS: KMDR JO
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION ON IRAQ

Summary

-- All papers lead today, October 19, with the trial
of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, scheduled to
start today before an Iraqi court. Some papers carry
extensive details about expectations of and
preparations for the trial on full inside pages.

Editorial Commentary

-- "The Iraqi Sunnis and the upcoming requirement"

Columnist Mohmmad Abu Rumman writes on the op-ed page
of the independent, centrist Arabic daily Al-Ghad
(10/19): "Despite news reports about extensive no-
voting by the Sunni Arabs on the constitution, it is
very difficult for the Sunnis to politically abort the
constitution. Yet, this does not nullify the fact
that a major development occurred on the Sunnis'
political stand to the effect of breaking the
consensus that existed against the political process .
a break that took place when the Islamic party
declared its acceptance of the draft constitution
provided that amendments to it are made. The party,
however, received extensive criticisms that reached
the point of armed assaults against some of its
members, not to mention criticisms by Arab writers who
considered its stand as disappointing and sometimes as
collaboration with the occupation. The stand of the
Islamic party poses a pivotal question about the
options of the Sunni Arabs and the requirements of the
upcoming stage: do they continue their political
boycott and armed resistance or do they take part in
the political process? Had the situation in Iraq been
normal and similar to the experience of Arab peoples
under colonialism, the main option would have been,
without a doubt, to continue the armed struggle and
resistance until the occupation is removed, which is
not only a legitimate stand, but also a correct human
approach.. Having said this, however, the Iraqi case
is quite different and requires a logical and
objective reading. This poses the question about
which is more dangerous to the future of Iraq: the
American occupation or the explosive domestic
situation? An objective reading of the situation
shows clearly that there is a major defect in the
internal status quo, which in itself paved the way for
an easy occupation and which is dragging Iraq towards
a real disaster. The most dangerous problem does not
lie in the occupation but among the Iraqis themselves,

who have two options: either resorting to the use of
weapons and the logic of extermination and civil war,
which inevitably will lead to dividing Iraq into
warring small states, or building the bases for
dialogue and communications, which can only be done
through the current political process.. Those who
oppose and reject the stand of the Islamic party,
namely their participation in the political process,
must provide convincing and rational alternatives,
provided that the Iraqi Sunnis and Iraq do not end up
paying the price. Enough bloodshed and wastage in
Iraq. The Iraqis have the right to brush off the dust
of the past and start their future rationally."

-- "Support the Iraqi Islamic party"

Columnist Jamal Khajuqji writes on the op-ed page of
independent, centrist Arabic daily Al-Ghad: (10/19):
"The reaction of extremist groups and the Salafi-Jihad
oriented factions against the Iraqi Islamic party's
success in achieving major concessions in its favor in
the draft constitution was violent, vicious, murderous
and bloody.. The Islamic party's move is positive and
takes the Sunnis from the realm of boycott and
marginalization to the realm of positive participation
and decision-making, something that these [the
extremists] do not want and so they launched a
campaign of hatred and killing against the party. The
party and all those moderate forces in Iraq need
support in order to help Iraq and its stability."

-- "The referendum: what is it for?"

Daily columnist Rakan Majali writes on the back-page
of the center-left, influential Arabic daily Al-
Dustour (10/18): "The processes of elections,
referendums, and the constitution in Iraq are all
tools in the big game aiming at deepening Iraq's
wounds, creating more conflicts and struggles,
disintegrating Iraq's steadfastness ... leading to
dividing the people's belief in the fact that Iraq
must be united, independent and sovereign. This is
what America wants to achieve by feeding the
conflicts, igniting dissention and spreading chaos.
This is the result that America hopes to achieve and
reinforce in Iraq through the referendum. Everything
else is mere details!"

-- "Iraq and the Arabs"

Chief Editor Ayman Safadi writes on the back page of
Al-Ghad (10/18): "The Arab League's Secretary
General, Amr Mousa, is arriving too late in Baghdad
carrying what he calls an Arab project to help save
Baghdad from the chaos, division, terrorism and
occupation. The Arab League will go down in history
as having made its initiative two and half years after
the Iraqis started to put together their country that
was dismembered by war and dictatorship. Amr Mousa's
visit to Baghdad will be a meaningless page in the
history book of post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, because the
interim elections took place ten months before the
Arab League realized its responsibility towards Iraq,
and voting on the constitution occurred a few days
before the Arab League envoy arrives in Iraq. The
results of these major stations in the political
process are much bigger than a wordy initiative by the
Arab League could do to change them. This, however,
does not negate the need of Iraq to have support from
the Arabs as it feels its way out of the quagmire in
which the failed American policies have put it. The
success of any Arab effort in Iraq is dictated by the
Iraqis' acceptance of that effort. The first thing
that needs to be done is a candid statement that the
Arabs accept whatever the Iraqis accept for
themselves. The role must be that of assistance and
not guardianship."
RUBINSTEIN