Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
05ALGIERS1159 | 2005-06-06 13:43:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Algiers |
1. (C) During June 5 meeting on other issues (septel), Presidential Chief of Staff Belkheir said both Morocco and Algeria were making efforts to send positive signals to the other, proceeding with plans for Prime Ministers Ouyahia and Jettou to meet in Rabat June 21-22, and hoping to re-energize the mixed commission process, with a view to re-opening the Moroccan-Algeria border later this year. Ambassador said we welcomed these positive signals and noted that we would shortly be demarching both capitals to express concerns about a series of earlier, negative events and urge renewed efforts to improve relations. Turning to Syria, and using very frank language, Ambassador flagged our strong concerns about Syria's unacceptable behavior, which was so clearly against the wishes of the international community for peace, democracy, and stability in Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine. He cautioned that in defending Syria so actively in New York and elsewhere, Algeria often seemed to be well outside mainstream Arab opinion. Such a posture risked creating negative perceptions of Algeria. Belkheir said he would brief President Bouteflika on concerns expressed by Ambassador. (End Summary) MOROCCO AND ALGERIA SENDING POSITIVE SIGNALS -------------------------- 2. (C) During a June 5 meeting on other issues, Presidential Chief of Staff Belkheir said both Morocco and Algeria were making efforts to send small, but important, positive signals to each other with a view to improving relations. The Algerian side saw as very positive the Moroccan statement responding to President Bouteflika's congratulatory letter to the Polisario because, according to Belkheir, it was "the very first time" Morocco had explicitly acknowledged the Western Sahara issue must be resolved within a UN (as opposed to bilateral) framework. Algeria had in turn responded with a public statement (by Minister of State and former FM Belkhadem) welcoming Morocco's recognition that the UN was the appropriate framework for resolving the Western Sahara dispute. 3. (C) While disappointed by the King's decision not to participate in the May 24-25 Arab Maghreb Union Summit in Tripoli, Algeria had positively noted Morocco's willingness both to participate in the summit at Foreign Minister level and to proceed with participation in the Algiers International Trade Fair. In another positive signal, Algeria had immediately agreed to a Moroccan request to permit overland travel by over a hundred performers coming to perform at the Moroccan Pavilion gala. (In the end, they decided to come by air. The Moroccan gala was attended by Belkheir and at least ten ministers, including the foreign and finance ministers, and thus a clear signal of a desire to get rapprochement back on track.) BELKHEIR REAFFIRMS THE GOAL IS REOPENING THE BORDER -------------------------- -------------------------- 4. (C) Belkheir also drew attention to Bouteflika's televised visit to the Moroccan pavilion, where a mock-up of a new hotel complex being built on the coast near the Algerian-Moroccan border was displayed. While viewing the mock-up, Bouteflika said that "50 per cent of the rooms should be reserved for Algerians." Belkheir implied this was a deliberate signal about the president's intentions of reopening the border. In this regard, and in response to Ambassador's direct question, Belkheir confirmed that the June 21-22 Rabat meetings between PM Ouyahia and PM Jettou would proceed as planned. These meetings would aim to re-energize the mixed commission process and resolve outstanding border issues. If agreement could be reached on these issues, including agreement on increased cooperation to combat the growing and very worrisome cross-border drug trade, Belkheir volunteered, this would lead to the opening of the border. He did not indicate the time frame for such a move and Ambassador decided not to press, but the impression he left was that it could be sooner rather than later (i.e., some time this summer). U.S. SUPPORTS CONTINUED RAPPROCHEMENT -------------------------- 5. (C) Ambassador welcomed the positive signals each side now seemed to be sending the other and reaffirmed our strong hope that a renewed process of rapprochement could lead to a reopening of the border. We had frankly been very concerned and disappointed by the recent series of events -- the Polisario letter, the King's withdrawal from the summit, the cancellation of the summit, and Morocco's violent suppression of Sahrawi demonstrations -- and would shortly be delivering demarches both in Rabat and Algiers expressing our concerns and urging renewed efforts to advance Moroccan-Algerian rapprochement. It was encouraging to see that both sides seemed to recognize their interest in getting things back on track. AMB: SYRIA FACILITATING INFLUX OF TERRORISTS AND SUPPORTING INSURGENTS IN IRAQ -------------------------- 6. (C) Ambassador then turned to Syria, noting that in his June 2 meeting with visiting SACEUR General Jones, President Bouteflika had spoken positively about recent Syrian actions, including the withdrawal of its forces from Lebanon and the impetus the Baath Party Congress would give to the reform process. Bouteflika, Ambassador noted, had also spoken about Syrian concerns that the U.S. was seeking to destabilize the regime, and had seemed unclear as to why we taking a hard line against Syria. Ambassador explained that we were not against Syria per se. We were against its unacceptable behavior. 7. (C) Syria was directly working against goals broadly shared by the international community, Ambassador continued. In Iraq, it was providing a support base and safe haven for insurgent groups, facilitating the flow of terrorists as well as arms and money, into Iraq from recruiting networks in the region, including in Algeria, and directly undermining efforts to stabilize the situation, proceed with reconstruction, and build a democratic state in which Iraqis were truly sovereign. Was Syria really helping the terrorists this way, Belkheir asked with apparent sincerity, to which Ambassador replied "absolutely, and without doubt." SYRIA ALSO WORKING AGAINST LEBANON AND ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN PEACE -------------------------- 8. (C) Syria's record on Lebanon was no better, Ambassador continued. While Syria had withdrawn uniformed troops, it had not withdrawn its intelligence services, and was in fact setting up new intelligence offices in various parts of the country. Many Lebanese were concerned that Syria was trying to destabilize the country and, while there was as yet no proof of responsibility, there were widespread suspicions, including within the senior Lebanese leadership, that Syria was behind the recent assassination of an influential anti-Syrian journalist. It is true that Syria has taken a few positive steps to address international concerns in both Lebanon and Iraq, but they have tended to conform to previous Syrian behavior. That is, they take a small step here and there, in hopes of diminishing and deflecting international attention, while not changing their basic negative behavior or orientation. On the Palestinian issue, Syria was similarly directly undermining efforts to advance a peace process by its active support of Palestinian rejectionist groups. When the entire world was hoping to seize the current hopeful moment to achieve peace and a democratic Palestinian state, Syria was working in the opposite direction. WE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY ALGERIA IS ALWAYS DEFENDING SYRIAN BEHAVIOR -------------------------- 9. (C) Ambassador, noting he would speak with candor as always, said we frankly did not understand why Algeria was always protecting and defending Syria, particularly at the UN, when Syria's actions were so clearly contrary to the wishes of the international community in Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine. We understood that Algeria, as the member of the Security Council representing Arab interests, had to reflect or at least take those interests into account. Our problem was that Algeria was not simply representing mainstream Arab interests. Instead, it was taking positions well to the left of the mainstream and defending Syria in a way that no other Arab states were. In effect, Algeria was associating itself, whether it liked it or not, with Syria's unacceptable international behavior. Ambassador cautioned that this has been noticed in Washington and New York, and risked creating negative perceptions of Algeria. Belkheir, after briefly speculating that perhaps Syria's behavior was linked to the continued occupation of the Golan, said he would brief President Bouteflika on the Ambassador's comments and concerns. ERDMAN |