Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04THEHAGUE814
2004-03-30 10:54:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): LIBYA AT EC-36

Tags:  PARM PREL LY CWC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 000814 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AC/CB, NP/CBM, VC/CCB, L/ACV, IO/S
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR CHUPA
WINPAC FOR LIEPMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/30/2014
TAGS: PARM PREL LY CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): LIBYA AT EC-36


Classified By: Pete K. Ito, U.S. Delegation to the OPCW for reasons 1.5
(b) and (d).

This is CWC-46-04.

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 000814

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AC/CB, NP/CBM, VC/CCB, L/ACV, IO/S
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR CHUPA
WINPAC FOR LIEPMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/30/2014
TAGS: PARM PREL LY CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): LIBYA AT EC-36


Classified By: Pete K. Ito, U.S. Delegation to the OPCW for reasons 1.5
(b) and (d).

This is CWC-46-04.


1. (C) Summary: In addition to many formal welcomes during
the 36th Executive Council (EC) session of the Organization
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) U.S., U.K. and
Libyan representatives had several opportunities to interact.
Each meeting was cordial and held in a mutually cooperative
atmosphere with discussion largely focused on the issues of
destruction technology for Libyan CW stocks, and the Libyan
desire for conversion of the Rabta facility. Libyan
representatives were active throughout the week and clearly
comfortable with their reception at the OPCW. Reactions from
other delegations to the Libyan attendance were also
positive. End Summary.

X. (C) The Libyan delegation to the March 23-26 EC was led
by Mr. Al-Mabrouk Mohamed Mailad, Head of the National
Security Branch of the equivalent of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. Colonel Ahmed Abul Houda, head of the Libyan
National Authority, was the chief interlocutor and was
accompanied by Dr. Ahmed Hesnawy, Col Mohammed Othman, Mr.
Daw Abdurraman, Mr. Ragab Abou Gaafar, Mr. Mahamad Khalifa
Alsoul, and Mr. Muftah El-Hamali Ahmed of the Libyan National
Committee for the CWC.


2. (C) On March 23, Horst Reeps, OPCW Director of
Verification, hosted a meeting with the Libyans, led by Abul
Houda, U.S. reps (Sylvester Ryan, Director VC/CCB and David
Weekman, AC/CB) and a U.K. rep (Richard Soilleux of DSTL,
Porton Down) to assess CW destruction technologies. Reeps
billed the session as a prelude to the technology discussion
to be hosted by the U.K. on March 29-30 at Porton Down. The
Technical Secretariat (TS) provided the Libyans with an
outline draft declaration for Category 2 CW destruction. The
meeting was mainly an open exchange on the various
technologies available. The TS emphasized that while it
might offer information, it was up to the possessor state
party to select a technology to use. The Libyans took an

active and insightful part in the discussion, but no
conclusions were drawn.


3. (C) A tour of the OPCW laboratory was arranged on March
24 and included Abul Houda, Hesnawy, Abdurraman, Rajab, Ryan
and Soilleux. Once again, the Libyans were active
participants and engaged in dialogue with the TS staff.


4. (C) Reaction from various delegations was very positive.
The Italians hosted a luncheon discussion on March 23 with
U.S. and U.K. reps, which included reaction from EU members
on the possibility of a conversion request for the Rabta CW
production facility. Giovanni Iannuzzi of the Italian MFA
stated that Italy would lean toward the most straightforward
solution to the problem of deadlines imposed by the CW
Convention by simply noting the apparent contradictions
between the Verification Annex, Part V, paragraphs 66 and 72
and selecting paragraph 66 as being operative. U.S. and U.K.
reps noted this solution and discussed other options without
drawing conclusions. The Italians further commented that
resolving a matter of the conversion deadline probably would
not be treated as a matter for collective action by the EU,
but that a solution put forward by the U.S, U.K., and Italy
could expect broad and active EU member support.


5. (C) Ryan and Weekman met with Houda and Hesnawy on March
26 for a wrap-up session. U.S. reps requested that the
Libyans give the TS permission to provide copies of
inspection reports to the U.S. Houda said that he personally
favored doing so, but would have to get permission in
Tripoli. He expected that this would not be a problem and
would send the TS a letter from Tripoli. Houda did not have
copies of the declaration verification reports, but
immediately handed over copies of the Preliminary Findings of
the inspections of the Al-Jufra CW storage facility and CW
destruction facility for the destruction of the Category 3
munitions (which were couriered back to Washington).


6. (C) U.S. reps thanked Houda and offered that
deliberations on the way ahead on WMD elimination were
currently on-going in Washington. They said that they would
not be surprised if one or more visits to Libya would be
requested, but that such a request would come at a high
level, not at the CW team level. Houda said that he welcomed
whatever visits might occur during the next phase, but
requested close coordination on dates for the CW team. The
Libyans, he noted, have been invited by several States
Parties for discussions on National Authority operations and
they want to be available when the CW team returned. U.S.
reps noted that among other issues that might be pursued, the
Libyans could expect one item would be the detailed questions
handed over in London in January, many of which have yet to
be addressed.


7. (C) Houda inquired about the situation surrounding the
Rabta conversion request. Ryan and Weekman acquainted him
with recent U.S./U.K. efforts to solve the deadline issue.
They also explained the process of building consensus on the
matter. Houda expressed appreciation for the efforts and
said that the conversion request would be ready to submit at
the appropriate time. U.S. reps noted that the deadline
issue must be solved first before the conversion request
should be submitted. Houda said he understood. U.S. reps
noted that each side should feel free to contact the other to
exchange information and questions.


8. (C) In a one-on-one meeting with Ryan later on March 26,
Houda noted that, while several delegations had approached
him with novel destruction technologies, Libya was interested
in proven methods of CW destruction. He further stated that
Libya knows it has the final decision on which technology to
use, but looks forward to working closely with Washington to
select the technology.


9. (U) Ito sends.
SOBEL