Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04THEHAGUE2331
2004-09-15 15:08:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

TERRORISM FINANCE: DUTCH AUTHORITY TO FREEZE ASSETS

Tags:  ETTC PTER EFIN KTFN NL EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 002331 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/ERA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETTC PTER EFIN KTFN NL EUN
SUBJECT: TERRORISM FINANCE: DUTCH AUTHORITY TO FREEZE ASSETS

REF: A. STATE 193684

B. THE HAGUE 0026

C. THE HAGUE 1213

D. THE HAGUE 1040

E. THE HAGUE 834

F. THE HAGUE 771

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 002331

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/ERA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETTC PTER EFIN KTFN NL EUN
SUBJECT: TERRORISM FINANCE: DUTCH AUTHORITY TO FREEZE ASSETS

REF: A. STATE 193684

B. THE HAGUE 0026

C. THE HAGUE 1213

D. THE HAGUE 1040

E. THE HAGUE 834

F. THE HAGUE 771


1. The following is provided in response to ref A request
for information on the status of the Netherlands' national
authority to freeze assets related to terrorism financing.
Ref B contains a detailed description of Dutch laws and
regulations on terrorism financing and related money
laundering activities as well as the relevant institutions
responsible for implementing these standards.


2. NATIONAL AUTHORITY TO FREEZE: The Netherlands has
national authority to identify, freeze and seize terrorist
finance assets, based on the "Sanction Provision for the Duty
to Report Terrorism" (Sanction Act),originally adopted in
1977 and amended on June 7, 2002, to include implementation
of UNSCR 1373 and EU regulation 2580/2001. Involvement in
financial transactions with individuals and/or organizations
designated nationally, by the EU (Clearinghouse process),or
UN lists (UNSCR 1267 and 1373) is a criminal offense. The
Sanction Act allows measures to be taken against individuals
or organizations on the basis of terrorist suspicion.
Terrorist assets have been frozen based on the authority
provided by the Sanction Act, UNSCRs, and EU Directives.


3. PROCESS AND LEGAL STANDARD: UNSCR designations are
automatically incorporated into EU regulations and are
applicable within the Dutch financial sector. A designation
through the EU Clearinghouse requires a unanimous decision
among member states, which is then applicable within the
Dutch financial sector. At the national level, an
inter-ministerial working group has been established to make
decisions on designations and to facilitate coordination and
communication on terrorist financing measures. The working
group includes representatives from the Foreign Affairs
Ministry, Justice Ministry, Finance Ministry, Netherlands
Intelligence and Security Services (AIVD),Public Prosecutor,
and financial sector supervisors. The AIVD has the primary
responsibility of collecting information for potential
designations by the working group. If the AIVD has an
indication that an individual/organization supports an entity

on the list, it can pass the information to the Public
Prosecutor dealing with terrorist cases. The Public
Prosecutor can act on the basis of the Criminal Law and
according to its discretionary powers. If the police have
specific information that the Sanctions Act has been
violated, the Public Prosecutor can start a criminal
investigation independently. The working group also
considers designations and evidence presented by other
countries, such as the U.S.


4. The Finance Ministry, in close coordination with the
Foreign Affairs Ministry, distributes lists of designated
entities whose assets must be frozen to financial
institutions and relevant government bodies, including local
tax authorities. Financial institutions screen lists of
customers on a timely basis. Exact hits automatically lead
to the freezing of all accounts of the customer. Personal
information and transaction records are subsequently
forwarded to AIVD through the Finance Ministry and the
financial market supervisors. The 1992 Asset Seizure and
Confiscation Act (Asset Seizure Act) was amended in 2003 to
improve and strengthen options for identifying, freezing and
seizing criminal assets. The police and special
investigation services are responsible for enforcement in
this area.


5. IMPLEMENTATION AND SUCCESSFUL CASES: According to
Justice Ministry sources, the Netherlands has frozen more
terrorist-related assets that any other EU member state.
Forfeiture statistics provided by the Office of the Public
Prosecutor show that assets forfeited and/or seized amounted
to 7.9 million euros (8.4 million dollars) in 2002, 9.1
million euros (10.1 million dollars) in 2001 and 10 million
euros (10.9 million dollars) in 2000. (These figures do not
represent exclusively terrorist financing assets.) In July
2004, the Netherlands froze all financial assets of the Dutch
branch of Al-Haramain. See ref C-F for further details.


6. OBSTACLES: Our working level contacts largely agree that
the biggest obstacle to implementing national asset freezing
authority is the large burden of proof that is required under
Dutch law before any action can be taken against individuals
or organizations on the basis of terrorist suspicions.
Although no Dutch judge has ever overturned an asset freeze
order under the Sanctions Act, Dutch officials have
repeatedly expressed concern that such actions are vulnerable
to challenge in local courts without legally sufficient
supporting evidence. As a result, Dutch officials prefer to
act under the umbrella of EU regulations and the EU
Clearinghouse process. However, proposals are under
consideration in the Second Chamber to shift the burden of
proof in the Dutch Asset Seizure Act from the Public
Prosecutor to the criminal.
SOBEL