Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
04THEHAGUE1657 | 2004-07-01 08:56:00 | SECRET | Embassy The Hague |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. |
S E C R E T THE HAGUE 001657 |
1. (S) PolOffs and Deputy Legal Counselor made ref A demarche to MFA Western Balkans Director Klaas van der Tempel on June 30. Van der Tempel said the GONL supported OHR's work against such individuals. Concerning freezing the assets of the individuals named in ref A, van der Tempel said that while the Netherlands would support such an action, the aim was to address this on an EU-wide basis. Previously, the Dutch have argued that it would be difficult, if not impossible, for them to impose such a freeze outside the EU context (ref B). Thus, while van der Tempel said the Dutch would support such a freeze, it would be in the context of "complicated" discussions in the EU's Working Party of Foreign Relations Counselors (RELEX). He suggested the USG engage with the Dutch Permanent Representation to the EU, and named Stefan van Wersh as the key POC. Van der Tempel thought an visa ban would be less complicated, but again said the decision would need to be made on an EU-wide basis. 2. (S) Economic Counselor and EconOff also delivered reftel points to the Dutch Ministry of Finance, which will pass them to the Dutch Central Bank, banking directors and the Dutch financial intelligence unit. MinFin officials also said that the GONL will follow the EU lead (which they said was planning a parallel move) concerning designation of these individuals. 3. (S) Comment: The Dutch have long been strong supporters of the ICTY and the need to apprehend indictees, particularly those whom van der Tempel called "the Big Three": Karadzic, Mladic and Gotovina. Van der Tempel went out of his way to emphasize the tough Dutch position, shared only by the UK, on Croatian EU candidacy. In light of Dutch assumption of the EU Presidency on July 1, their role in forming an EU consensus for financial measures against PIFWC supporters could be important, though the task would remain difficult. End comment. SOBEL |