Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04TAIPEI3494
2004-11-04 09:51:00
CONFIDENTIAL
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

HIGH COURT DISMISSES MARCH 20 ELECTION CASE

Tags:  PGOV TW 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003494 

SIPDIS

STATE PASS AIT/W

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/10/2013
TAGS: PGOV TW
SUBJECT: HIGH COURT DISMISSES MARCH 20 ELECTION CASE


Classified By: AIT Deputy Director David J. Keegan, Reason: 1.4 (B/D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003494

SIPDIS

STATE PASS AIT/W

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/10/2013
TAGS: PGOV TW
SUBJECT: HIGH COURT DISMISSES MARCH 20 ELECTION CASE


Classified By: AIT Deputy Director David J. Keegan, Reason: 1.4 (B/D)


1. (C) Summary: The Taiwan High Court rejected a case filed
by opposition leaders Lien Chan and James Soong to overturn
the March 20 election. The court announced that the
opposition failed to support its claims that President Chen
Shui-bian won the election through illegal means. Opposition
lawyers immediately announced their intention to appeal the
ruling and expressed confidence that a separate case
challenging the conduct of the election would result in a
more favorable verdict. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)
officials urged Lien to follow the example set by Senator
John Kerry and gracefully accept defeat. Instead, KMT
Chairman Lien Chan declared that the court's ruling marked
the "darkest day in the history of Taiwan's judiciary." On
the eve of the verdict, Lien offered the inflammatory
suggestion to the KMT's Central Standing Committee (CSC) that
Chen be subject to assassination as an illegitimate leader.
The November 4 decision did not come as a surprise to either
camp. However, observers on both sides believe the
Pan-Blue's apparent rejection of the legal process may
alienate moderate voters in the December 11 election. End
Summary.

Verdict In: Lien is a Loser
--------------


2. (SBU) The Taiwan High Court on November 4 rejected a civil
suit brought by the Lien-Soong campaign over the results of
the March 20 presidential election. The Pan-Blue alleged
that Chen's victory was illegitimate because of voting
irregularities and the alleged concoction of the March 19
shooting of Chen and Vice President Annette Lu. A High Court
spokesman held a press conference after the announcement to
explain the court's rulings on each part of the Pan-Blue's
case. The spokesman noted that the court's full recount of
the March 20 ballots changed the election results by only
4,000 votes (reducing Chen's margin of victory from 29,518
votes to 25,563 votes). The court also found that the
plaintiffs failed to prove their allegations that the March
19 shooting incident was staged, that the decision to hold
the referendum on the same day as the election skewed the
results, or that military and police personnel were deprived
of their right to vote due to the shooting incident. As the

losers in the case, the Pan-Blue was ordered to pay nearly
NTD 17 million (USD500,000) in court fees. Lawyers
representing the Pan-Blue leaders announced plans to appeal
the decision immediately after the verdict was announced.


3. (C) KMT Chairman Lien rejected the court's verdict,
declaring November 4 the "darkest day in the history of
Taiwan's judiciary." Lien asserted that it was not the
Pan-Blue's responsibility to provide proof to back its
allegations, but rather the court's duty to thoroughly
investigate them. In the days leading up to the court
decision, the Pan-Blue camp placed ads in major papers
denouncing the legal process and accusing the DPP government
of manipulating the courts. At a November 3 KMT CSC meeting
with open press, Lien sparked controversy by using an ancient
Chinese phrase ("renren zhizhu") to suggest that the
president should be assassinated if the court ruled in Chen's
favor. A proposal by Lien that the KMT mobilize supporters
to surround the courthouse before the verdict was announced
was reportedly rejected by party vice chairmen Wang Jin-pyng
and Ma Ying-jeou. Nevertheless, several hundred Pan-Blue
supporters along with a handful of Pan-Blue Legislative Yuan
(LY) candidates gathered in front of the court to protest the
verdict. Some protesters threw eggs at riot police.


4. (C) Despite their combative public stance, Pan-Blue
officials privately say they did not expect the court to find
in its favor. People First Party (PFP) Deputy Policy Chief
Lee Yun-jie told AIT on the eve of the court decision that
there was zero expectation the case would go for Lien and
Soong. "This isn't a matter of political interference in the
judiciary," he stated, "it is simply that no judge in Taiwan
would consider overturning a major election, even if there
was clear proof of fraud." KMT Policy Chief Tseng
Yung-chuan, a Lien loyalist, told AIT weeks before the
verdict that the Pan-Blue camp had largely written off the
challenge to the election results, but still held out hope
that a separate court case filed against the Central Election
Commission (CEC) over the voting process might produce a more
positive result.

DPP Response: The Kerry Model
--------------


5. (C) Presidential Office Secretary General Su Tseng-chang
publicly urged Lien and Soong to look to Senator John Kerry's
statesman-like concession speech on November 3 as a model for
resolving the divisions that have existed within Taiwan since
the March 20 election. Presidential Office Secretary Liu
Shih-chung told AIT that the DPP would use Kerry's concession
speech as a core theme in its campaign for the December 11 LY
election. "The timing of Kerry's graceful concession speech
juxtaposed with Lien's threat against the president could not
have been better from our perspective," Liu remarked.

Pan-Blue Reaction: Strike Two
--------------


6. (C) The court decision was not unexpected, but Lien Chan's
statements in the lead-up to the ruling have handed the DPP
yet another free PR victory. For weeks, Pan-Blue moderates
have expressed fears that an emotional, provocative reaction
by Lien or Soong to the court ruling would further alienate
centrist voters in December. What is more troubling than
Lien's outburst is silence on the part of the two contenders
for future KMT leadership, Ma Ying-jeou and Wang Jin-pyng.
The KMT's immediate response after the verdict was announced
was less provocative than its earlier public statements, but
Lien's November 3 apparent threat against the president has
already set back the KMT's efforts to portray itself as a
responsible, moderate voice of opposition.
PAAL