wikileaks ico  Home papers ico  Cables mirror and Afghan War Diary privacy policy Privacy
Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04TAIPEI3206
2004-10-14 08:28:00
UNCLASSIFIED
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT CHEN'S NATIONAL DAY

Tags:  OPRC KMDR KPAO TW 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
						
						
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003206

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD -
ROBERT PALLADINO
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT CHEN'S NATIONAL DAY
SPEECH


A) "China's Taiwan Affairs Office Fails to Accommodate
President Chen Shui-bian's Soft Landing"

The conservative, pro-unification "United Daily News"
editorialized (10/14):

". Judged from various angles, the statements issued by
China's Taiwan Affairs Office's Wednesday were already
tantamount to a political showdown. Beijing seems to
say that unless President Chen acknowledges the `one
China' principle and thus establishes a political
premise, it would be meaningless to discuss any future
issues concerning both sides, including the three
links, direct charter flights and other interactions
across the Taiwan Strait - meaning that the door would
be closed for any cross-Strait discussions.

"President Chen's reference to the `1992 Hong Kong
meeting as the basis' [for re-opening cross-Strait
talks] shows that he is also clearly aware that the
`1992 consensus' is the key to resuming cross-Strait
interaction and that he hopes Beijing could accept his
`synonym' to improve on the impasse caused by `one
China.' But Beijing has refused to accept Chen's
attempt to use `1992 Hong Kong meeting' to replace the
`1992 consensus' in exchange for a `soft landing.'
Beijing even made a tighter definition [of the `1992
meeting'] and directly called Chen `deceptive.' For
Beijing, the three direct links and charter flights are
no longer its priorities now, and the `one China' has
become a political premise that allows no [other]. ."

B) "Chen Uses the United States' `Patience
Recommendation' to Wait for Ice to Melt [Across the
Taiwan Strait]"

Journalist Lo Chia-wei noted in the conservative, pro-
independence "United Daily News" (10/14):

". President Chen, in response to China's Taiwan
Affairs Office's remarks, said `the United States has
told us to be patient.' Chen's words have offered a
good beginning for both sides of the Taiwan Strait to
`put aside their disputes.' There may be a chance for
improvements in the cross-Strait situation next spring
if Taiwan's goodwill gestures can last beyond the
legislative elections and Beijing can act in a softer
manner . ."

C) "To Concentrate Taiwan People's `General Will.'"

DPP Legislator Shen Fu-hsiung said in an op-ed in the
centrist, pro-status quo "China Times" (10/14):

"It is not unexpected that China's Taiwan Affairs
Office would harshly criticize President Chen's
National Day speech. On the surface, it seems that
negotiations and reconciliation between the two sides
of the Taiwan Strait are in the indefinite future. But
for Taiwan, now is the best chance for us to work out a
consensus among ourselves. .

"Even though Chen's speech has failed to win a goodwill
response from Beijing, it still has indicative
significance in coordinating the disputes inside Taiwan
regarding unification and independence. The president
has maximized the possible forms for the future
development of cross-Strait relations - namely, except
for Taiwan independence, there are other options like
forming a federation, confederation, commonwealth, or
even a unified one-China framework. All of these can
cover the majority views held by the Taiwan people.
Chen's move proves that he has broken the blockade of
the fundamentalists regarding cross-Strait issues and
has returned to the pragmatic central route."

D) "Taiwan, Mainland on a Collision Course"

The conservative, pro-unification, English-language
"China Post" said in an editorial (10/14):

". By offering to use the 1992 meeting instead of the
1992 consensus as the model for resumed talks,
President Chen was in fact denying there was such a
consensus.

"The `one China principle,' which implies that both
Taiwan and the mainland are apart of China, was the
basis for cross-Strait talks. The Chen administration
has been unwilling to acknowledge that there was any
such consensus because it runs counter to the ruling
party's pro-independence stance.

"The present predicament makes the prospects for cross-
strait peace rather dim. The ruling DPP and its allies
are determined to bring Taiwan independence to reality.
Even some political opponents of the `green' camp,
believing that this can win them more grassroot
support, tend to support the independence campaign.

"The trend is putting Taiwan and the mainland on a
collision course. Beijing will by no means tolerate
the declaration of statehood by the Taipei government.
It will do everything possible, including the use of
military force, to thwart the movement of Taiwan toward
independence."

"Tension in the Taiwan Strait will in all likelihood
rise further as the independence advocates aggressively
push for the accomplishment of their goal and the
Beijing government make intense efforts to stop them.
The future of Taiwan has become highly unpredictable,
with the possibility of the outbreak of war growing
steadily."

E) "The One China Myth Is the Source of Sadness for the
Taiwan People"

The pro-independence "Liberty Times" editorialized
(10/14):

". Today, China has made it very clear that only by
sticking to the one China principle can both sides
resume talks. The one China principle is a synonym for
`annexing Taiwan.' Therefore the Pan-Blue politicians
in Taiwan should cut off their links with the one-China
principle, identify with Taiwan and accept democracy,
or they will only bring Taiwan towards the tragic
ending of war. Taiwan's elected leader should also
stop wasting his effort in dealing with China
meaninglessly. The only right way is to assert
Taiwan's identity and seek a way out for the 23 million
people."

PAAL