Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04ROME568
2004-02-17 08:24:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

ITALIAN VIEWS ON PROSPECTS FOR WTO TALKS IN 2004

Tags:  ETRD IT WTO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 000568 

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

STATE PASS USTR
GENEVA FOR USTR

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD IT WTO
SUBJECT: ITALIAN VIEWS ON PROSPECTS FOR WTO TALKS IN 2004

REF: STATE 6662

UNCLAS ROME 000568

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

STATE PASS USTR
GENEVA FOR USTR

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD IT WTO
SUBJECT: ITALIAN VIEWS ON PROSPECTS FOR WTO TALKS IN 2004

REF: STATE 6662


1. (SBU) Summary. Following the European Commission's lead,
the GOI generally agrees with USTR Zoellick's initiative, as
expressed in his January 11 letter to trade ministers, to
ensure that 2004 not be a lost year for trade negotiations.
However, Italy was disappointed that the letter made no
mention of geographic indications. While Italian trade
officials agree that market access is a crucial pillar of the
WTO talks, they believe Zoellick's letter underestimated the
importance of trade facilitation. The GOI is pessimistic that
progress can be made in the services negotiations pending
meaningful offers from significantly more members. Foreign
Trade Vice Minister Urso views as highly unlikely the
prospect for a WTO ministerial this year. End summary.


2. (U) On February 4 Amedeo Teti, Director General for
Commercial Agreements in the Ministry of Productive
Activities (Foreign Trade Division),accompanied by the
Ministry's WTO office director Sandro Fanella and WTO
Services expert Stefano Santacroce, provided GOI prospective
on USTR Zoellick's letter on the Doha Development Round (DDR)
in a meeting with Ecmin and econoffs. Econoff met separately
on Feb. 13 with the Ministry's Technical Secretariat Chief
Federico Eichberg (a close advisor to Vice Minister Adolfo
Urso).


3. (SBU) Echoing EC Trade Commissioner Lamy, Teti told us
that the GOI was generally happy with the content of
Zoellick's letter. However, Teti and his colleagues pointed
out several areas of the DDR that they believe received
insufficient attention in the letter, including trade
facilitation, geographical indications, and the current state
of services offers.


4. (SBU) While recognizing the importance of market access
issues to the success of the DDR, Fanella expressed some
concern that Zoellick's letter overemphasized such attention
to the detriment of other components of the Doha Round. He
noted particular disappointment that the letter paid little
attention to rules issues, especially the "Singapore Issue"
of trade facilitation, which, he noted, remains a key EU
concern.


5. (SBU) Teti and Fanella said there is also concern among
some EU member states that Zoellick's emphasis on the
complete elimination of export subsidies for agricultural
products moves the U.S. away from the common ground reached

just before the Cancun ministerial (in the August 2003
U.S.-EU framework on agriculture). The GOI would have
preferred a more nuanced approach on export subsidies from
the U.S., in order to prevent EU hard-liners on subsidies
(Fanella named France and Ireland) from using a seemingly
inflexible U.S. position to put up roadblocks. Fanella added
that Italy was not particularly concerned about the U.S.
position, just its potentially negative effect on the EU's
ability to reach a cohesive position for further negotiations
on agriculture.


6. (SBU) Teti noted GOI disappointment that Zoellick made no
reference in his letter to geographical indications (GIs),a
topic of enduring interest to Italy. Teti suggested that, in
the realm of intellectual property, GIs were generally more
recognized by many developing countries as warranting
protection, compared to areas of special concern to the U.S.
such as audiovisual products and computer software. He
argued that strengthened GI protection within the WTO
context, once implemented in the developing world, could help
effect a gradual shift in opinion towards the usefulness of
IPR protection in general. Teti suggested that the U.S. and
the EU seek points in common that would enable them to merge
their focus in these two areas of IPR protection, with the
goal of expanding awareness of the need to protect IPR.


7. (SBU) Teti expanded on the theme of potential U.S.-EU
collaboration on GIs by suggesting the negotiation of a
bilateral agreement similar to the one the EU reached with
Canada in 2003. He admitted, however, that a similar
agreement with Australia, a decade ago, no longer seemed very
effective, given increasing Australian resistance to the EU's
position on GI protection through the WTO. Nevertheless, Teti
suggested such an accord could prove a useful tool should the
U.S. and the EU decide on a joint approach to IPR protection
in the developing world. Fanella added that any such

negotiation would need to fold in the ongoing, and still
unresolved, U.S.-EU wine negotiations. (Neither Teti nor
Fanella suggested that this idea was under serious
consideration by the European Commission.)


8. (SBU) Eichberg told us the GOI would have preferred that
the EC not have expressed so directly its willingness to be
flexible on GI protection in the course of WTO negotiations.
Nevertheless, he said the GOI was generally satisfied by the
EC's continued commitment to pursuing enhanced GI protection
in the WTO. Still, the GOI will keep close watch this year
on the EC to ensure it maintains this commitment.


9. (SBU) Santacroce noted GOI agreement with Zoellick on the
importance of the services sector to the overall goal of
expanding market access. However, the GOI is concerned about
moving forward now on services negotiations, given that only
forty countries have tabled offers. Many of those cannot be
considered meaningful proposals (Santacroce specifically
pointed out India). He expressed concern that attempting
progress on services without significantly more meaningful
offers could lead to the less-than-ideal creation of a dual
track process.

Comments of Foreign Trade Vice Minister Urso
--------------


10. (SBU) In a meeting with the Ambassador on February 12
that focused principally on Italian participation in Iraqi
reconstruction (to be reported septel),Vice Minister Urso
said the GOI appreciated the positive and ambitious approach
outlined in Zoellick's letter. He also welcomed positive
developments that had taken place at this week's WTO General
Council meeting to reinvigorate negotiations. However, he was
not optimistic that a successful WTO ministerial could take
place this year given the imminent departure of both Lamy and
Zoellick, and suggested that WTO members should aim for a
meeting in early 2005 that would be removed from the
influence of electoral politics in the U.S. and the EU.


11. (SBU) Comment: Not surprisingly, the GOI's take on
Zoellick's letter varies little from the EC's generally
positive reaction. GI protection remains an exception to the
GOI's general passivity on trade, though Teti's suggested
linking of the EU's GI concerns with U.S. concerns on IPR
does not appear to be more than an Italian fantasy at this
point. Italy instead seems resigned to making sure the EC
does not give away the store by agreeing to an excessively
"flexible" position on GIs in order to satisfy the other
concerns of more vocal EU member states. End comment.
SEMBLER


NNNN
2004ROME00568 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED