Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04RANGOON1224
2004-09-16 10:44:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rangoon
Cable title:  

SHOWDOWN AT THE ILO? GOB CAVALIER ON FORCED LABOR

Tags:  PHUM PGOV PINS ELAB BM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 001224 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV; PACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/08/2014
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PINS ELAB BM
SUBJECT: SHOWDOWN AT THE ILO? GOB CAVALIER ON FORCED LABOR
PROBLEMS

REF: A. RANGOON 1136

B. RANGOON 676 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: COM Carmen Martinez for Reasons 1.4 (b,d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 001224

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV; PACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/08/2014
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PINS ELAB BM
SUBJECT: SHOWDOWN AT THE ILO? GOB CAVALIER ON FORCED LABOR
PROBLEMS

REF: A. RANGOON 1136

B. RANGOON 676 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: COM Carmen Martinez for Reasons 1.4 (b,d)


1. (U) This is an action request. Please see para 11.


2. (C) Summary: The ILO's Burma representative corroborates
UNHCR reports of a "serious resurgence" in forced labor in
Rakhine State. He adds that the GOB has dismissed all recent
ILO interventions on forced labor and appears to be
completely indifferent to potential countermeasures imposed
by the international community. We've requested a meeting
with the Minister of Labor to raise our concerns about these
forced labor reports and alleged GOB complicity and to
highlight potential repercussions for Burma at the November
ILO Governing Board meeting. End Summary.


3. (C) P/E chief met on September 8 with Richard Horsey,
liaison officer for the International Labor Organization
(ILO),to discuss recent reports of a surge in the use of
forced labor in Rakhine State. Horsey not only corroborated
the alarming reports we've heard from UNHCR and others
sources (ref A),but assessed that the forced labor situation
near the western border "is the most serious it has been in
years."


4. (C) Horsey said that the ILO first learned from
independent sources in July that local military units in
northern Rakhine State were rounding up villagers to rebuild
six bridges in northern Maungdaw Township, near the border
with Bangladesh. Military commanders required each nearby
village to provide 45 persons per day to work on the project;
villages unable to contribute labor were forced to offer cash
payments to local authorities. The project contractor, who
reportedly has close ties with SPDC military intelligence,
provided small food packets or "minuscule" cash payments to
some villagers, but most were uncompensated.


5. (C) The ILO made a written intervention to the GOB on July
23, documenting the reports of forced labor in Rakhine State
and requesting action to address the problem. Horsey noted
that villagers forced to work on the bridges were unable to

partake in the seasonal planting of rice, leading to food
shortages and reduced family income. The GOB responded in
late August that its "Convention 29 Implementing Committee"
had dispatched a field observation team to Rakhine State and
concluded that there was no merit to the reports of forced
labor, "which appear to be nothing more than rumors spread by
jealous contractors."


6. (C) Horsey was not surprised by the GOB's flat denial.
The ILO, he said, has made 35 interventions thus far this
year to the GOB, documenting credible reports of forced labor
throughout Burma. The GOB has responded to roughly two
thirds of the inquiries, ignoring the remaining third, and
denying in every case that any forced labor existed. In one
egregious example, Horsey provided the GOB with a first-hand
account of forced labor in Chin State, including photos of
women and children working on a road project. The GOB
acknowledged that the project existed, but claimed that all
work was "mechanized" and required no human labor whatsoever.


7. (C) In early September, Horsey met with the GOB's
Interagency Implementing Committee on forced labor and raised
the Rakhine reports as well as additional forced labor
issues, including: the arrest of two individuals after they
had filed forced labor complaints with the ILO office in
Rangoon; the arrest of three individuals in southern Rakhine
State after they had written the GOB with complaints of
forced labor; and the ongoing court case of several Burmese
convicted of treason for having contact with the ILO (ref B).
Horsey said he had expected the GOB, facing a November ILO
Governing Board meeting in Geneva, to be superficially
cooperative or to at least take minimal efforts to stem the
most blatant cases of forced labor. However, Horsey said,
"the GOB is unconcerned about our reports and appears to be
completely indifferent to potential ILO sanctions."
Comment: The Comfort Zone

8. (C) Forced labor and other human rights abuses in Rakhine
State, home to a significant portion of Burma's repressed
Muslim minority, are not new phenomena. Such practices,
condoned and encouraged by the GOB and the Burmese Armed
Forces, were a primary factor leading to the mass exodus of
several hundred thousand ethnic Rohingyas who fled Burma into
Bangladesh in the early 1990s. However, the presence of UN
agencies and NGOs in the region, and corresponding pressure
from the ILO since 2000, had until this year led to an
overall decline in the use of forced labor.


9. (C) Local ILO staff acknowledge that the use of forced
labor had declined overall throughout Burma, but conclude
that such progress does not reflect the regime's desire to
stem labor abuses and was simply a result of international
pressure and a GOB effort to forestall punitive ILO action.
According to ILO rep Horsey, the outstanding treason court
case, the recent resurgence of forced labor practices, and
the GOB's lack of response could very likely lead the ILO in
November to reactivate a 2000 resolution calling on ILO
members and affiliates to review relations with Burma. The
ILO, he added, may also seek to invoke new and unprecedented
measures under Article 33, such as discouraging foreign
direct investment in Burma.


10. (C) We find this resurgence in forced labor incidents,
and the GOB's cavalier attitude toward the possibility of ILO
action, a further sign that a decline in pressure from ASEAN
and others in the region has allowed the regime to feel
increasingly secure in its political comfort zone. End
Comment.


11. (C) Action Request: The Chief of Mission has requested a
meeting with Minister of Labor, Tin Winn, to express our
concern over the reports of forced labor in Rakhine State,
including the alleged complicity of local government and
military authorities. Post would appreciate, as background
and additional talking points for this meeting, more
information on the anticipated process at the November ILO
meeting and potential measures directed at the GOB for its
failure to stem forced labor practices. We understand that
Burma discussions in Geneva are scheduled to take place on
November 17 or 18. End action request.
Martinez