Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04PARIS4951
2004-06-29 15:45:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Paris
Cable title:  

TITLE III LIBERTAD ACT WAIVER: FRANCE

Tags:  ETTC FR CU PREL 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

291545Z Jun 04

ACTION WHA-00

INFO LOG-00 NP-00 AF-00 AS-00 CIAE-00 CIP-00 COME-00
 CTME-00 INL-00 DODE-00 DOEE-00 DS-00 EAP-00 EB-00
 EUR-00 FBIE-00 VC-00 H-00 TEDE-00 INR-00 VCE-00
 NEA-00 NSAE-00 OES-00 OMB-00 TFBI-00 PM-00 FMPC-00
 SS-00 STR-00 TRSE-00 T-00 EPAE-00 IIP-00 PMB-00
 DSCC-00 PRM-00 G-00 NFAT-00 SAS-00 /000W
 ------------------372D69 291549Z /38
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3962
INFO NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY ALGIERS
AMEMBASSY ANKARA
AMEMBASSY ATHENS
AMEMBASSY BEIJING
AMEMBASSY BEIRUT
AMEMBASSY BELIZE
AMEMBASSY BERLIN
AMEMBASSY BERN
AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
AMEMBASSY BRIDGETOWN
AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS
AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
AMEMBASSY CANBERRA
AMEMBASSY CARACAS
AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN
AMEMBASSY DUBLIN
AMEMBASSY GEORGETOWN
AMEMBASSY HANOI
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
AMEMBASSY KAMPALA
AMEMBASSY KINGSTON
AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR
AMEMBASSY LISBON
AMEMBASSY LONDON
AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG
AMEMBASSY MADRID
AMEMBASSY MEXICO
AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
AMEMBASSY NASSAU
AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
AMEMBASSY PANAMA
AMEMBASSY PRAGUE
AMEMBASSY PRETORIA
AMEMBASSY RABAT
AMEMBASSY ROME
AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
AMEMBASSY SANTO DOMINGO
AMEMBASSY SEOUL
AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM
AMEMBASSY TEGUCIGALPA
AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV
AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
AMEMBASSY TOKYO
AMEMBASSY TUNIS
AMEMBASSY VIENNA
AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
AMEMBASSY WINDHOEK
AMCONSUL HONG KONG
USEU BRUSSELS 0837
USINT HAVANA
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 004951 

SIPDIS


DEPT FOR WHA/CCA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/27/2014
TAGS: ETTC FR CU PREL
SUBJECT: TITLE III LIBERTAD ACT WAIVER: FRANCE

REF: STATE 135512

Classified By: A/DCM SHARON WIENER FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 004951

SIPDIS


DEPT FOR WHA/CCA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/27/2014
TAGS: ETTC FR CU PREL
SUBJECT: TITLE III LIBERTAD ACT WAIVER: FRANCE

REF: STATE 135512

Classified By: A/DCM SHARON WIENER FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (C) Summary: In response to reftel, we met June 24 with
the MFA Cuba Desk Officer, who noted that France had been
sharply critical of Cuba's human rights record bilaterally
and as an EU member. Even before Havana unilaterally refused
EU and French assistance, France had reevaluated its position
on aid to Cuba and severely restricted and restructured
programs so that they would focus on those that most
benefited the populace rather than Castro,s regime. A
failure to waive Title III of the Libertad Act for France
would be harmful to our overall bilateral relations and could
have a negative effect on relations with the EU. End Summary.


France Through the EU
--------------


2. (U) In a June 24 meeting, French MFA Cuba desk officer
Eric Chaux stressed that the United States and France shared
the common goal of a democratic Cuba with a government that
respects human rights and individual freedoms. France holds
to the common EU position on Cuba, adopted by the EU Council
of Ministers in December 1996. This decision makes the
conclusion of an EU cooperation agreement with Cuba
conditional upon Havana initiating democratic reforms,
protecting human rights, and introducing political freedoms.
In response to Cuba's arrest of 75 dissidents in March 2003
and reinstatement of the death penalty, France, along with
the other members of the European Union, condemned the abuse
of human rights and fundamental freedoms in a June 5, 2003
declaration. In addition, the EU imposed penalties against
Cuba, including limiting bilateral high-level governmental

visits and announcing an intention to invite Cuban dissidents
to national day celebrations. France subsequently invited a
number of dissidents to the July 14, 2003 Bastille Day
celebration in Havana. As a result of the June 5
declaration, Cuba declined to accept any aid from the EU.
The EU reaffirmed its position in regards to Cuba and the
previously imposed restrictions in its statement of June 14,

2004.

France Bilaterally
--------------


3. (C) In May 2003, France reevaluated its bilateral
assistance to Cuba. The result was a decision to concentrate
cooperation only in those areas where it would most benefit
the general populace, notably health, agriculture,
professional development, the environment, and scientific
research. Additionally, France suspended, among others, its
bilateral police and judicial program. These actions
triggered a backlash in Havana, much like the reaction
triggered by the June 5 EU declaration. French actions
resulted in Cuba unilaterally refusing French assistance and
severing negotiations on new programs. Castro has also cut
official contact between the GOC and the French Embassy in
Havana. Most recently, France voted with the United States
to condemn the human rights situation in Cuba in a close 22
to 21 vote April 15 at the 60th Session of the UN Commission
on Human Rights.

French Concerns About Title III Impact
--------------


5. (C) In a conversation subsequent to the June 24 meeting,
Chaux indicated to PolOff that he had spoken to colleagues in
other EU countries about the Title III Libertad Act and the

country-specific assessment process. He expressed concern
about the possible impact of non-renewal of the Title III
waiver on French and other EU members. He requested in-depth
and high level consultations in advance of a final USG Title
III waiver decision in regards to France. He also indicated
that EU members would likely meet to discuss the possibility
of Title III implementation.

Title III Waiver Recommended for France
-------------- --------------


6. (C) Comment: France, both bilaterally and through
multilateral channels, has reacted strongly to Cuba's spring
2003 crackdown on dissidents. Imposition of Title III of the
Libertad Act against France could have a number of negative
effects on our relations with the GOF at a time when we are
looking for French support in a number of critical areas.
Granting a waiver would be in the U.S. national interest in
order to maintain strong cooperation with France inter alia
in promoting support for human rights and democratic
transition in Cuba, on Haiti, and on counter-terrorism.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that a Title III waiver be
issued for France. At a minimum, we should take seriously
the French request for high-level consultations before a
Title III waiver is ruled out. End Comment.
Leach


NNNN