Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04NEWDELHI7673
2004-12-03 13:07:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:  

INDIAN JOURNALISTS RAVE ABOUT VISIT TO PAKISTANI KASHMIR

Tags:  PREL PK 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 007673 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/02/2014
TAGS: PREL PK

SUBJECT: INDIAN JOURNALISTS RAVE ABOUT VISIT TO PAKISTANI KASHMIR

Classified By: DCM Robert O. Blake, Jr. Reasons 1.4 (B,D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 007673

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/02/2014
TAGS: PREL PK

SUBJECT: INDIAN JOURNALISTS RAVE ABOUT VISIT TO PAKISTANI KASHMIR

Classified By: DCM Robert O. Blake, Jr. Reasons 1.4 (B,D).


1. (C) Summary: Participants returning from a November 19-December 1 trip by 26 Indian journalists to Pakistan have reported overwhelming popular support in Pakistani Kashmir for opening the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad Road. The media representatives were generally surprised by what they saw, and noted widely diverging notions on the shape of a final settlement of Kashmir, including strong pro-independence views in Mirpur (less in Muzaffarabad),and a much-reduced terrorist presence. We summarize the main observations of several of the participants, as related to us and reported in the press, for their insight on what the Indian political class is hearing from the other side of the LOC. If travelers are correct about the strong sentiment in Pakistani Kashmir for roads to open, this mirrors the views of their cousins in the Valley, and endows the December 7-8 Indo-Pak talks on Srinagar-Muzaffarabad bus links with special significance. End Summary.


2. (C) Organized by the South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA),this was a return visit after a group of Pakistani journalists came to J&K in October under SAFMA auspices (Reftel). Indian participants (including several Kashmiris who traveled with Indian passports) reported that the Lahore and Islamabad legs were useful for their opportunities to interact with senior GOP officials, including President Musharraf, and politicians, but were most enthusiastic about their travel in Pakistani Kashmir (Mirpur, Muzaffarabad, and Gilgit),which most had never seen before (a few had traveled to the state in past years, but none more recently than four years ago). They were able to travel where they wished, but lamented that their full program allowed less time to explore their special interests.


3. (C) In conversations following their return, the Indian journalists praised the warm reception and hospitality they received almost across the board, and the access they were given -- to most of those they wanted to see except Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) supremo Syed Salahuddin (one visitor claimed he was axed from the program because Islamabad did not wish to admit that he was living openly in Pakistan). Another traveler said the President of the Muzaffarabad Press Club praised the group for ""doing a great job to heal the wounds of a battered humanity.""
India and Pakistan: Open This Road!

--------------


4. (C) Kashmiri reporters told us their strongest impression was the yearning in POK for an opening of the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad Road, hopefully to be followed by the Jammu/Suchetgarh-Sialkot, Poonch-Kotli, and Kargil-Skardu crossings. An overwhelming majority of interlocutors in POK reportedly saw this as the most important CBM India and Pakistan could adopt. There was no interest in using a visa and passport system, on the grounds that the LOC would take on characteristics of an international border. Yusuf Jameel from the ""Asian Age"" said a large number of Kashmiris he met who had crossed the LOC since 1989 wanted to return to the Valley, regardless of the consequences, but claimed that the Fence was making it more difficult to do so.
Other Observations
--------------


5. (C) Trip participants also made other observations on their experiences in POK, the most interesting of which we summarize below:

-- Tahir Mohiuddin (Chattan/Srinagar) was impressed that he no longer saw militants traveling openly on the roads, as he had four years ago, an indication that Musharraf and the ISI were ""at least doing something against terrorism.""

-- V Sudarshan (Outlook) reported that nostalgia, hate, metaphor, reality greeted the journalists in Mirpur.
Interlocutors reportedly told him residents of POK were ""not even allowed to go to Gilgit."" Other POK residents considered the governments in both POK and J&K ""puppets,"" and opined that the only way to determine the views of the people of pre-1947 J&K was to allow travel. The Mirpur Bar Association President reportedly told him ""(we) are prepared to fight for 2000 years,"" to deafening applause.

-- Shujaat Bukhari (Hindu) was struck by the size of the migration from J&K to POK since the insurgency began in 1989, observing that 35,000 Kashmiris from the Valley were ""eagerly waiting to board the first peace bus."" Migrants in POK complained about dreary lives, and thought of themselves as ""kings at home but dependents"" in POK. The cease-fire has allowed them to travel up to the LOC to wave at their relatives in J&K, but go no further. He reported ""hardly a voice of dissent"" over free movement between POK and the Valley, although there was no consensus on a final solution to Kashmir.
-- Sushant Sareen (Observer Research Foundation, Delhi)
reported widely diverging views on the shape of a final settlement of Kashmir. He was particularly interested in the views of former Azad Kashmir PM Sardar Abdul Qayoom Khan, who had changed his mind over time and now argued that ""given ground realities in J&K, there does not appear to be a permanent solution to the Kashmir dispute in sight. Maybe we should only look for a series of interim solutions."" Sareen considered Qayoom the most realistic of all the politicians the group had met during their stay in POK, in that he was willing to consider other steps to improve Kashmiris' lives before settling their final status. Other politicians were ""caught in a time warp,"" or (in the case of the Amir of Jamaat in POK) were ""consumed by hatred of India,"" and strongly supported the jihadis, he stated.

-- Other journalists reported a session they had at Azad Kashmir University in Muzaffarabad, where they heard strong pro-independence and pro-accession (to Pakistan) views (as well as complaints of large numbers of ISI agents in the auditorium, impeding free speech). Advocates of an independent Kashmir told the Hindu's Bukhari that there were at least 16 cases of student expulsions there for these views.

-- Indrajit Hazra (Hindustan Times) was amazed to see Tarun Vijay, Editor of the RSS weekly Panchajanya, ""barely able to hold himself back from launching forth on India-Pakistan amity.""

-- Hazra also reported that ""azadi"" (""freedom"") is ""on all minds"" in POK, more so in Mirpur than in Muzaffarabad, where she noted a radically different tone, ""almost as if independence was an abstract afterthought."" Sareen commented that the pro-independence lobby is well aware that there is ""no question of Pakistan ever allowing control over Azad Kashmir or the Northern Areas to slip out of its hands."" This prompted some to ask why India does not call Islamabad's bluff by conceding the plebiscite principle. He reported that local journalists had described ""a change in mindset in POK in favor of independence,"" primarily as a result of their treatment at the hands of the Pakistani establishment.

-- Several found significant improvements since previous visits 4-10 years ago. They were impressed with infrastructure improvements in Gilgit. A Jammu-based editor was amazed at the excellent roads and uninterrupted power supply (in sharp contrast to what Indians are used to).
Comment
--------------


6. (C) As with the October visit by Pakistani journalists to J&K, this visit was unusually successful in exposing influential Indian and Kashmiri opinion leaders to realities in Pakistani Kashmir, areas most know only from reading and hearsay. A couple of the travelers considered the trip one of their most important foreign trips ever. If participants' dominant conclusion -- that there is strong sentiment among Kashmiris in POK for roads to open -- accurately reflects local views, it mirrors those of their cousins in the Valley.
New Delhi and Islamabad can ignore this popular opinion as they bicker over travelers' documentation, but from the Delhi perspective the desire for people-to-people contact on both sides of the LOC seems strong. This endows the December 7-8 Indo-Pak talks on the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad bus links with all the more significance.
MULFORD