Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04LJUBLJANA266
2004-04-01 05:38:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Ljubljana
Cable title:  

SLOVENIA: "FORMER SOVIET BLOC" RHETORIC ILL-

Tags:  PREL MARR PGOV KMDR SI NATO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS LJUBLJANA 000266 

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR EUR, EUR/PPD, EUR/NCE, EUR/RPM, EUR/SCE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL MARR PGOV KMDR SI NATO
SUBJECT: SLOVENIA: "FORMER SOVIET BLOC" RHETORIC ILL-
RECEIVED (AND FOR GOOD REASON)

REF: LJUBLJANA 0259

UNCLAS LJUBLJANA 000266

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR EUR, EUR/PPD, EUR/NCE, EUR/RPM, EUR/SCE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL MARR PGOV KMDR SI NATO
SUBJECT: SLOVENIA: "FORMER SOVIET BLOC" RHETORIC ILL-
RECEIVED (AND FOR GOOD REASON)

REF: LJUBLJANA 0259


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: The Slovenian media have reported
extensively on erroneous references to Slovenia as part of
the "former Soviet Bloc" made during recent NATO accession
ceremonies. Slovenes take umbrage at this historical
inaccuracy and the lack of understanding it demonstrates as
to how former Non-Aligned and Warsaw Pact countries differ
in their perspectives, priorities, and philosophies.
Lumping of Slovenia together with the other six new NATO
Allies under a single "post-Soviet" rubric has unfortunately
added a bitter twist to many otherwise positive media
commentaries on NATO accession. Allies must learn from this
experience, in order to better manage Slovenian public
opinion and policy makers, but also in order to better
prepare for the next group of potential invitees. END
SUMMARY.


2. (U) On March 30, Slovenia's commercial POP TV carried a
story during its main evening -news broadcast on Slovenia's
accession to NATO that contained a brisk commentary by U.S.
correspondent Natasa Briski on American misunderstandingof
Slovenian history. Briski noted that "the U.. media have
continuously reported that [the curent round of NATO
accession] concerned only the cuntries of the former Soviet
Bloc." She also reorted that "Based on what Bush said, we
can alsoconclude that on this historic occasion the
Presdent's speechwriters didn't bother to trouble
thmselves with Slovenia's history." The report came n the
heels of POP TV's previous day's coverage aking the same
point.


3. (U) Slovenia's leadng print daily "Delo" also carried a
report on Mrch 31 by its U.S.-based correspondent Ervin
Hlanik-Milharcic quoting President Bush's statement tht
"When NATO was founded, the people of these seen nations
were captives to an empire." Milharcc then sarcastically
commented on the President' statement by claiming that "In
these few sentenes before the White House, Bush was able to
discoer a historical common denominator." Left-of-center
"Vecer" also points out in a March 31 report about the White
House ceremonies that "in President Bush's words these
nations were captives of an empire."


4. (SBU) COMMENT: Although the Slovenian media will
generally find fault with U.S. policymakers whenever
possible, we certainly are not doing ourselves any favors by
portraying Slovenia as a former member of the Soviet Bloc.
Such historical inaccuracies grate particularly harshly on
Slovenian ears and exacerbate sensitivities that stem from
the country's size and relative obscurity on the world
stage. Slovenes take pride in the fact that Yugoslavia was
never a member of the Warsaw Pact and that it jealously
guarded its independence from Moscow. Historically
conditioned fears of imperial subordination make it
appropriate that this distinction (always) be acknowledged.

5. (SBU) COMMENT Cont: It is also important for policy-
makers in Washington and other Allied capitals to appreciate
the implications of the proudly non-aligned mindset that
Slovenia brings to the NATO table. Average Slovenes value
rather than repudiate their Cold War orientation, feeling a
certain sense of superiority for having been "above" taking
sides. They carry little emotional baggage about relations
with Russia and are likely to make reasoned, practical
decisions about whether/how to work with Russia in the NATO
context. They feel less of a sense of historical obligation
to the original NATO members, other than that generated by
NATO's role in ending conflicts in the region. They also
still retain neutrality-based instincts about eschewing
military conflict, and the old view of NATO and the Warsaw
Pact as two sides of the same coin. This means that the
Slovenian population (and some policy-makers) will approach
policy issues differently and will likely have a different
set of knee-jerk reactions than other new Allies will. It
also means that Slovenia may be able to offer NATO
insightful advice about managing enlargement in other former
Yugoslav countries. END COMMENT.


YOUNG


NNNN


2004LJUBLJ00266 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED



v1.6.2