Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04LJUBLJANA265
2004-03-31 12:12:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Ljubljana
Cable title:  

HEALTH, INTERIOR MINISTERS SURVIVE INTERPELLATION,

Tags:  PGOV PINR SI 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS LJUBLJANA 000265 

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PINR SI
SUBJECT: HEALTH, INTERIOR MINISTERS SURVIVE INTERPELLATION,
PEOPLES PARTY MAY NOT

REF: LJUBLJANA 0106

UNCLAS LJUBLJANA 000265

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PINR SI
SUBJECT: HEALTH, INTERIOR MINISTERS SURVIVE INTERPELLATION,
PEOPLES PARTY MAY NOT

REF: LJUBLJANA 0106


1. (U) SUMMARY: Opposition-launched motions for the removal
of Health Minister Dusan Keber and Interior Minister Rado
Bohinc were debated by the National Assembly on 29 March and
30 March, respectively. Keber retained his position by a 47-
28 vote, along party lines. Bohinc survived by a 46-30 vote.
The Peoples Party (SLS),a junior governing coalition member,
abstained rather than following through on its earlier public
threats to support the interpellation motions. One LDS
deputy crossed party lines to vote for Bohinc's removal. In
the end, SLS is likely to suffer the most from the escapade.
END SUMMARY.

--------------
Keber
--------------


2. (U) On 27 February, the opposition Slovenian Democratic
Party (SDS) and New Slovenia Party (NSi) filed a motion for
the interpellation of Health Minister Dusan Keber accusing
him of "apparant violations of legislation." The motion was
supported immediately by the Slovenian National Party (SNS)
and soon thereafter by the opposition Youth Party (SMS).
Three of the four governing coalition parties -- the Liberal
Democratic Party (LDS),the United List of Social Democrats
(ZLSD),and the Pensioners Party (DeSUS) -- stood behind
Keber. The Peoples Party (SLS); however, publicly vacillated
for over a month, claiming it would decide based on Keber's
responses to the accusations.


3. (U) The National Assembly considered the SDS/NSi
interpellation motion on 29 March in a day-long debate
conducted as part of its regular March session. Among other
complaints, SDS and NSi accused Keber of selling the Trnovo
Hospital at an undervalued price, overspending for MoH
offices, delay unduly in building a much-needed pediatric
clinic, involvement in a highly questionable tender for the
purchase of operating tables for Klinicni Center -- the main
hospital in Ljubljana, and a poor performance in preparing an
exhaustive health reform package. Keber refuted all
accusations -- some more convincingly than others -- and said
that attacks on the reform were expected since it changes
current situation.


4. (U) The vote at day's end was along party lines and its
outcome was no surprise. Twenty-eight opposition deputies
voted in favor of the interpellation motion. Forty-seven
deputies supported Keber's retention by voting against the

motion. All ten SLS deputies abstained from voting, despite
the party's many public hints that it would support the
interpellation.

--------------
Bohinc
--------------


5. (U) Also on 27 February, the SDS filed an interpellation
motion against Interior Minister Rado Bohinc (ZLSD) because
of his "inadequate" implementation of the April 2003
Constitutional Court decision regarding the "erased"
(reftel). On 01 March SNS announced its grudging support for
the "badly drafted" SDS motion and on 02 March, NSi decided
to back it as well. LDS and ZLSD immediately voiced
opposition to Bohinc's removal, with DeSus eventually
following suit. On 22 March, junior coalition party SLS made
headlines when it announced it would back the SDS motion
against Bohinc, despite public warnings on the consequences
of such a decision from PM Rop.


6. (U) The National Assembly considered the Bohinc
interpellation on 30 March in another day-long debate. The
primary set of complaints against Bohinc revolved around his
management of various aspects of the "erased" issue. He also
was accused of procedural errors in the purchase of a police
boat, chaotic management of a variety of public
administration issues (salaries, pensions),and misuse of the
Ministry's publication, "Slovene Administration." Bohinc
refuted all accusations and emphasized that his actions on
the "erased," however controversial, were in accordance with
the Constitution and the law.


7. (U) Again, the final vote on the motion basically
followed party lines, with 30 deputies supporting Bohinc's
removal and 46 opposing it. Of interest, one LDS
parliamentarian broke party ranks to vote in favor of the


interpellation. Additionally, five SLS deputies abstained
from voting, despite the party's clear public stance
supporting the interpellation. The five announced their
decision to abstain in a public letter to SLS President Janez
Podobnik, in which they argued that supporting the
interpellation would mean violation of the coalition
agreement and that the party should first leave the coalition
before supporting the interpellation.

--------------
Comment
--------------


8. (SBU) Both interpellations were doomed from the start. To
be successful, an interpellation motion must receive 46 votes
in favor. LDS (Keber) and ZLSD (Bohinc) together have 45
seats in the National Assembly without the support of the
other two coalition parties and the two ethnic minority
representatives who historically vote with the coalition.
Thus, the two opposition initiatives were intended to serve
mainly as a podium from which to criticize GoS actions on
high profile issues causing public discontent -- health care
reform and the erased.


9. (SBU) An additional, and somewhat unexpected, benefit
that SDS and NSi got from the interpellation is the split it
caused within SLS, with whom they usually compete for votes.
In this regard both parties might see a slight increase in
their popularity in the April public opinion polls, at SLS
expense.


10. (SBU) SLS seems likely to suffer the most from the
entire escapade. While the party could have gained some
voter support by publicly standing up to LDS and ZLSD on an
issue of principle, the abstentions now make it look both
disloyal and weak-kneed. At the same time, the party's last-
minute reversal is unlikely to save it from internal
coalition reprisals. The betrayal has already occurred and
the political circles will no doubt suffer the consequences.
Although SLS won't be kicked out of the coalition, its policy
influence will be significantly reduced and it will be kept
out of the loop on any sensitive political strategy issues --
exactly the consequences it likely would have suffered if it
had supported the interpellations. END COMMENT.

YOUNG


NNNN