Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
04KUWAIT1248 | 2004-04-15 06:20:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Kuwait |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. |
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 KUWAIT 001248 |
1. SUMMARY: Kuwaiti commentators have been rattled by events in Fallujah and the rise of Moqtada al-Sadr. Islamist MPs and others decry what they term a "brutal" US response and have issued press statements calling for Muslims to resist the "US occupation of Iraq" and the presence of US troops in Kuwait, while liberals call for the Kuwaiti government to put conservative elements in their place. Other commentary reflects anxiety that the US will fail in Iraq and retreat from the country, leaving Kuwait to deal with a hostile and destabilized northern neighbor. END SUMMARY. 2. "A Year Of American Failure In Iraq" Dr. Wael al-Hassawi wrote in independent Al-Rai al-A'am (4/12): "A year after the fall of the former Iraqi regime, Baghdad is back to where it started; aircraft bombing various cities, artillery shelling, hundreds of dead in Fallujah and utter bedlam. The reason behind this chaos is the American Administration's blundering approach in running Iraq. Is the Administration deliberately attempting to maintain the status quo, so it can continue its dominance and postpone its withdrawal? The reality is quite the contrary; the United States is living a war of attrition, which brings back memories of Vietnam. Added to that, the United States has no experience in nation building and Iraq is known that since the dawn of civilization, that it is extremely hard to control. The Bush Administration is in an unenviable situation, and may lose the elections due to the deteriorating situation in Iraq." 3. "Blood On The Tigris Banks" Former MP and Islamist Dr. Abdel Muhsin Jamal wrote in independent Al-Qabas (4/12): "What has changed one year after the fall of the former Iraqi regime? Saddam used to kill in secret, whereas now, American aircraft are bombing Iraqi cities, houses, and mosques for the whole world to see. Saddam used to single out Kurds and Iraqi Shia, now Americans, are adding Iraqi Sunnis on that list. The biggest paradox is that a year ago, American forces entered Baghdad with no resistance and very few casualties; today Americans are facing a full-blown national uprising and vicious resistance. President Bush should have celebrated with the Iraqi people the first anniversary of the fall of the former regime and the return of democracy. Except, what we are witnessing is continued bloodshed and more battles." 4. "What Now ... Fallujah?" Nabil Al-Fadhl wrote in independent Al-Rai Al-A'am (4/12): "Fallujah is the center of Islamic radicalism in Iraq before being the center of Baath Party remnants. It is a hotbed of criminality and terrorism. Therefore, we don't see any reason why Kuwaiti Islamic blocs sympathize with them, except if it were sympathy of a Muslim toward another Muslim, and this is the kind of sympathy that sustains the theory of the extremist right in the west that Islam poses a global danger. We would have hoped that Kuwaiti Islamic blocs would distance themselves from the Fallujah events and call on their counterparts to use their better judgment. If American and international forces do not hit Fallujah and Ramadi with an iron fist, the river of blood will continue to run." 5. "New Regime ... Same Old Supporters" Emad al-Saif wrote in independent Al-Qabas (4/12): "What is currently taking place in Iraq is a struggle for power. Events in Fallujah are a natural extension of the culture of violence, obsession with power and absolute duplication of Saddamist ideology. This is natural and expected of a society that has lived for more of thirty years in a background of violence. Events in Fallujah are the crowning of the entire secret plans that have finally come out to claim the biggest chunk out of Iraq. This has exposed the cheap exploitation of religion and loyalty for the sake of power. This also reveals that Iraq if full of new Iraq Saddamists." 6. "The Problem With Individual Dominating Regimes" Ghassam Al-Otaibi wrote in independent Al-Qabas (4/12): "The main problem facing Iraqis, is the political vacuum left by former regimes. This is a similar problem faced by all Arab nations that depend on one all dominating individual dictatorship. Since such rgimes take unilateral actions and deprive their citizens of all rights, these same citizens cannot make right decisions nor can they run their country. That is why it is important for the coalition forces to remain in Iraq, in order to preserve Iraq's national interest and for security to prevail. Those calling for the coalition forces to withdraw, cannot understand the magnitude of the catastrophe which may befall Iraq, because, many radical and terrorist groups are biding their time to pounce on power." 7. "Cowboys In The Land Of The Two Rivers" Kuwait University Academic Dr. Jassem Al-Fuhaid wrote in independent Al-Rai Al-A'am (4/13): "A year after entering Baghdad with their tanks, the American Administration, is exposed for its scandalous blundering in dealing with a complex situation in Iraq. The dominant "cowboy" mentality coupled with arrogance and excessive use of force is prevalent among the American Military, treating the Iraqis as if they were an ignorant bunch of Indians who can be easily tamed by the white man. In light of the current bloody conflict and the rampant chaos in Iraq, will America be able to transfer sovereignty to the Governing Council in seventy- five days?" 8. "A Political Crisis" Amna Al-Mousawi wrote in independent Al-Rai al-A'am (4/13): "Recent events confirm that America is involved in a first class political crisis. By ignoring the international will, Washington is now alone, facing a quagmire. The latest wrong move by Washington was the use of excessive force to subdue the Iraqi people. This, in turn, completely removed the human mask, which Washington conceitedly wore for so long. It has become clear that Bush is no different than Sharon when it comes to accomplishing the Zionist-American secret agenda in the Middle East. Ideally, Iraq should have been the perfect example for change vis--vis the GMEI, but the aim of this concept is to completely erase the Arab identity." 9. "Mixed Affairs" Dr. Yaser Al-Saleh wrote in independent Al-Rai Al-A'am (4/13): "Many Kuwaitis experienced pride and pleasure for Kuwait's active contribution in the war on Iraq, whose conclusion was the end of the former Iraqi regime. Kuwait's classification as a non NATO ally of the United States, require a few commitments which are seen by some Iraqis as aiding and supporting the coalition in killing the Iraqi people. In this context, we mentioned in previously that for us, the right strategic choice is to stand side by side with the Iraqi people. However, if foreign forces were to sustain heavy losses, they may feel it is time to leave the region, as has occurred in other areas around the world, then we would be alone facing our neighbors." 10. "Where Are The Arabs?" Rashed Al-Radaan wrote in independent Al-Watan (4/14): "Arabs will not help the Iraqis one bit. If Iraqis are eager about ridding their country of the occupation, then they are before two options. The first is to negotiate and follow in the path of diplomacy and peaceful resistance until the situation settles down. The second option is armed resistance, no matter what the consequences. Of course the first option is wiser to adopt. Events in Fallujah have proven that duplicity and betrayal amongst Iraqis wanting to settle past disputes were the reasons behind the conflict. Iraqis must adopt peaceful resistance means, such as political pressure, instead of relying on the Arab league or Arab sense of honor." 11. "Has Iraq Entered The No-Choice Tunnel?" President of the American University in Kuwait, Dr. Shafiq al- Ghabra wrote in independent al-Rai Al-A'am (4/14): "Recent events in Iraq represent a race with time, between the American forces and those who oppose their presence. Each party has an agenda of their own on how to reach power. The United States is facing a situation it never expected to face, and the Iraqi people had different expectations especially with the fall of the former Iraqi regime. Recent battles in Iraq indicate that Iraqis are entering a long dark tunnel. In light of present circumstances, the United States is seeking to ascertain a way to withdraw from Iraq. Iraq has become a testing ground of American power, a test for all the parties who oppose the American role regionally and internationally, and a test of American-Israeli and America-Arab relations." Urbancic |