Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04KATHMANDU280
2004-02-10 09:18:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL: SECURITY SOURCES CONFIRM INDIANS HAND OVER

Tags:  PTER PREL NP IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L KATHMANDU 000280 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR SA/INS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2014
TAGS: PTER PREL NP IN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: SECURITY SOURCES CONFIRM INDIANS HAND OVER
TWO MAOIST CENTRAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS

REF: A. 03 KATHMANDU 1649


B. 03 KATHMANDU 2298

Classified By: POL PMAHONEY. REASON: 1.5(B,D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L KATHMANDU 000280

SIPDIS

STATE FOR SA/INS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2014
TAGS: PTER PREL NP IN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: SECURITY SOURCES CONFIRM INDIANS HAND OVER
TWO MAOIST CENTRAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS

REF: A. 03 KATHMANDU 1649


B. 03 KATHMANDU 2298

Classified By: POL PMAHONEY. REASON: 1.5(B,D).


1. (C) Police and Army sources have confirmed that on
February 8 Indian authorities handed over Maoist Politburo
member Matrika Yadav and Maoist Central Advisor Suresh Ale
Magar to the Royal Nepal Army (RNA). Unconfirmed reports
suggested that the Maoists may were captured in the northern
Indian city of Lucknow and were planning to attend a rally to
be held in New Delhi on February 15. (Note: An announcement
of the rally posted on the Maoist website described its
purpose as to "foil the attempt of American imperialism to
infiltrate South Asia through Nepal." End note.) Yadav was
a member of the five-man Maoist negotiating team during the
2003 ceasefire and was released from detention by the
Government of Nepal as a confidence-building measure during
the 2001 ceasefire.


2. (C) Comment: It is widely assumed by many in Nepal
that much of the Maoist leadership spends much of their time
in India. The apparent ease with which Communist Party of
Nepal - United Marxist Leninist General Secretary Madhav
Nepal held a "secret" (but otherwise quite well-publicized)
meeting with Maoist leader Prachanda in Lucknow on November
20 only helped confirm such suspicions (Ref B). That
meeting, coupled with the equally well-advertised Maoist
rally planned in New Delhi, were likely sources of
embarrassment for the Indian government. With these most
recent two arrests, the only three Maoist Central Committee
members currently in custody have been apprehended by Indian
authorities. (Politburo member Chandra Gajurel, arrested in
Chennai on August 20, remains in Indian custody.) The Maoist
propaganda mill has been in overdrive recently threatening a
wide-ranging "shock program" of sabotage, strikes and general
mayhem to commemorate the eighth anniversary of the
insurgency on February 14. Indian cooperation in arresting
this pair--especially so close to this anniversary--is an
important sign of progress.
MALINOWSKI