Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04GUATEMALA2804
2004-11-04 22:29:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Guatemala
Cable title:  

GUATEMALA'S EX-PARAMILITARY GROUPS BLOCK

Tags:  ASEC GT PGOV PHUM PINS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

042229Z Nov 04
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GUATEMALA 002804 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ASEC GT PGOV PHUM PINS
SUBJECT: GUATEMALA'S EX-PARAMILITARY GROUPS BLOCK
TRANSPORTATION COUNTRY-WIDE

REF: GUATEMALA

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GUATEMALA 002804

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ASEC GT PGOV PHUM PINS
SUBJECT: GUATEMALA'S EX-PARAMILITARY GROUPS BLOCK
TRANSPORTATION COUNTRY-WIDE

REF: GUATEMALA


1. Summary. Guatemala's ex-PAC members practically shut down
the nation on November 3 in protests over the Government's
failure to disburse payments promised to them in the 2003
election. These payments have been delayed due to
constitutional challenges to the process. Congress
immediately met to resolve the primary challenge, but many
others remain. The economic damage from the blockades was
significant as the transportation network was paralyzed. The
ex-PAC leaders are likely encouraged by their success and may
use these tactics again if their grievances are not resolved,
given that there is little talk of punishment for the illegal
activity. End summary.

Protests and damages
--------------

2. Veterans of the Civilian Self-defense Patrols (known as
ex-PAC, by their Spanish initials) again protested the
failure of government to approve payments for their service
during the Guatemalan civil war by blocking highways,
airports, seaports, and other transportation infrastructure
on November 2. The protests blocked at least 38 different
highways and facilities throughout Guatemala, disrupting
commerce, transportation, and tourism. Some highways were
blocked at dozens of points, trapping travelers between
blockades. Flights were diverted from the airport serving
major tourist destinations in the north of Guatemala to other
installations.


3. Economic damage from the protests was significant. In at
least one major seaport, no ship could load or unload cargo,
nor could local industrial operations access the port to
process their exports. The paralyzation of the road network
shut down commerce nationwide. Representatives from the
umbrella business chamber CACIF estimated that this type of
interruption costs Guatemalan businesses USD 1.5 million per
day. They further noted that the hardest hit amongst the
victims of these interruptions were the small- and
medium-sized businesses, many of whom deal with perishable
goods.

Reasons for discontent
--------------

4. Payments to the ex-PAC were a major issue in the 2003
presidential campaign. Before the 2003 elections, the former
Portillo Government made the first of a projected three
payments to approximately 500,000 ex-PAC members. (Note: At
their peak in the 1980s, the Guatemalan Army had enrolled 1.2
million members in the PAC, many in an involuntary manner.
End note.) Under President Berger, the new Government passed
a bill to continue the project, however, the Constitutional
Court upheld a privately-mounted legal challenge. The
Guatemalan Constitution requires that new proposals identify
funding sources, which the original ex-PAC payment
authorization bill did not.


5. While the protests and highway blockades passed without
overt violence, the national disruption spurred Congress to
consider immediately the draft revisions to the bill
authorizing issuance of treasury bonds to finance payments in
2004, 2005, and 2006. Congress passed the bill with the
favorable vote of 114 of 120 Members of Congress present in
the late afternoon of November 2, but Government officials
reportedly stated that they would send the revised bill to
the Constitutional Court for review before enacting its
provisions. Indeed, a second constitutional challenge by a
coalition of human rights groups and private citizens remains
pending. While this second challenge includes the funding
issue that Congress ostensibly resolved, it also challenges
the project under more than a dozen other constitutional
provisions.

Comment
--------------

6. Many observers, including Members of Congress, human
rights organizations, and the international community are
repelled by both the general idea of making payments to the
ex-PAC and the specific processes for doing so, which are
rife with potential for abuse. Nonetheless, the Government
cannot go back on its promise to make the payments, given the
ex-PAC demonstrated capability of mobilization and the
percentage of the electorate that stand to gain short-term
benefit from the payments. The Government inherited this
mess from the previous administration, and has neither
sufficient funds nor sufficient support for the project.
They have no choice, however, but to continue anyway.


7. It is unfortunate that it took such significant social
interruption to spur Congress into action. Having rewarded
the ex-PAC for their economically damaging protests,
Guatemala can expect more of the same, particularly as there
has been little discussion of punishment for ex-PAC leaders
for these illegal activities (although the Public Ministry
did request arrest warrants for three of the ex-PAC leaders).
We expect further disruption on the part of ex-PAC members
who did not receive payments in the first tranche, as well as
more wide-spread protest over any delay of further tranches,
which can be expected due to financial and legal
considerations.
HAMILTON