Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04BRUSSELS3948
2004-09-16 15:52:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Brussels
Cable title:  

DEMARCHE RESPONSE: REVISED US VISIT POLICY AND

Tags:  CVIS PREL KOCI EUN USEU BRUSSELS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 003948 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR CA - JJACOBS; EUR/ERA - PCHASE; DHS FOR BTS
- SVERDERY; DOJ FOR CRIMINAL DIVISION - BSWARTZ; THE HAGUE
FOR POL - DMANN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/16/2014
TAGS: CVIS PREL KOCI EUN USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE RESPONSE: REVISED US VISIT POLICY AND
OTHER BORDER MANAGEMENT ISSUES

REF: (A) STATE 195507 (B) THE HAUGE 1775

Classified By: PRMOFF MARC J. MEZNAR. REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 003948

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR CA - JJACOBS; EUR/ERA - PCHASE; DHS FOR BTS
- SVERDERY; DOJ FOR CRIMINAL DIVISION - BSWARTZ; THE HAGUE
FOR POL - DMANN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/16/2014
TAGS: CVIS PREL KOCI EUN USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE RESPONSE: REVISED US VISIT POLICY AND
OTHER BORDER MANAGEMENT ISSUES

REF: (A) STATE 195507 (B) THE HAUGE 1775

Classified By: PRMOFF MARC J. MEZNAR. REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (C) Summary. The initial reaction from the European
Commission on the FBI's enhanced access to US VISIT databases
was low key. Major concerns focused on types of law
enforcement activities for which the data would be used and
about delays at ports of entry following changes on 9/30 and
12/31. The Commission urged the U.S. to step up its
information campaign so that travelers from visa waiver
countries are aware they will be fingerprinted at ports of
entry. New Member States continue to press for a unified EU
approach towards the U.S. visa waiver program and have
indicated they will not agree to changes concerning the
Schengen Agreement's solidarity mechanism. The recent
U.S.-Poland bilateral agreement to screen passengers at the
Warsaw airport has also fueled resentment in European
circles. End Summary.


2. (U) On 9/14, PRMOff delivered reftel talking points to
Diederich Paalman at DG Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
regarding changes to the US VISIT program, including enhanced
FBI access to the database. Paalman referred to the phone
conversation between DHS DAS Verdery and JHA Director General
Jonathan Faull, but said the Commission would prefer to react
after it had a chance to read the revised privacy policy and
related documents (available only after COB in Brussels that
day).

--------------
US VISIT: Workloads of More Concern than Policy Changes
--------------


3. (C) On 9/16, PRMOff met with JHA Director for Immigration,
Asylum and Borders Jean Louis de Brouwer, JHA External
Relations Head of Unit Lotte Knudsen, and JHA
Biometrics/Privacy Policy Officer Silvia Kolligs for a more
in depth discussion. De Brouwer expressed appreciation for
efforts made by the USG to notify the Commission before
changes were publicized. Reactions to the changes themselves
were muted. De Brouwer had two basic questions which PRMOff

answered using the Q & A's included in reftel A: (a) what
"enhanced" access meant and (b) how the information would be
used by the FBI. De Brouwer pressed hardest on the second
point. PRMOff stressed, according to Question 11, that data
would be used "to investigate crimes related to national
security, immigration offenses and other major crimes, such
as murder, rape, robbery, organized crime and drug
trafficking." De Brouwer seemed satisfied that use would not
extend to investigations regarding less serious types of
offenses like civil matters.


4. (C) After making a pro-forma pitch about the importance of
ensuring privacy under the new information sharing
arrangements, de Brouwer focused his comments on upcoming
changes, both on 9/30 and at the end of the year. Regarding
new procedures to enroll VWP travelers in US VISIT as of
9/30, de Brouwer strongly urged the U.S. to intensify its
information campaign to alert VWP travelers to the new
requirements. "What you are doing is perfectly legitimate,
but you need to explain it well (to the traveling public) in
advance," he said. He predicted a spate of highly
unfavorable press articles if certain travelers with strong
privacy instincts -- or "opinion leaders" -- were unaware of
changes at the border and made to surrender prints (or worse,
be turned around at ports of entry).


5. (SBU) PRMOff stressed that previous rollouts involving
digital scans -- at consulates abroad and at POEs for those
entering with visas -- had not resulted in significant public
relations problems. To the contrary, the moves had a very
high level of public acceptance. De Brouwer pointed out that
with the vast increase in numbers exclusively involving
travelers from developed countries (where privacy concerns
are greatest),the dynamic could shift. Kolligs showed a US
VISIT pamphlet she had received during her voluntary visitor
program on biometrics and related privacy concerns,
suggesting they be distributed at airline counters abroad for
travelers headed to the U.S. from VWP countries. Those with
strong objections could decide not to board and thus avoid
unpleasant turn-arounds.


6. (SBU) The second item of concern connected to 9/30 raised
by de Brouwer was the expectation of long delays at ports of
entry caused by increased US VISIT workloads. Kolligs said
that in a briefing she had received from Cogent Incorporated,
about 70,000 new biometric records are added to the US VISIT
each day. Consequently, the response time has decreased from
15 seconds in March until 20 seconds today. PRMOff pointed
out that even with this increase, the inspector at the port
of entry would be using the response time to conduct an
interview with the passenger in order to determine
admissibility to the U.S. PRMOff predicted that after a
brief period of adjustment to accommodate the increased
number of passengers being enrolled in US VISIT, DHS would
succeed in minimizing delays at POEs.


7. (U) De Brouwer also asked about workload management at
land borders following the expansion of US VISIT at the end
of the year. PRMOff explained that although US VISIT did not
apply to U.S. citizens, most Canadians or Mexicans using the
biometrically enabled border-crossing cards, there was still
a need to plan well for these changes. Because the EU is
intensely interested in the management of land borders (as it
tries to figure out how to cope with its own new external
frontier in the east),de Brouwer requested that the U.S.
make a presentation on this theme at the upcoming CIREFI
(Centre for Information, Discussion and Exchange on the
Crossing of Frontiers and Immigration) meeting with the U.S.
and Canada scheduled for 10/29 in Brussels.

--------------
VWP: Still Causing Angst
--------------


8. (C) De Brouwer used the meeting to discuss several related
issues, particularly in light of the upcoming meetings in The
Netherlands with Secretaries Ridge and Ashcroft. Regarding
the visa waiver program, he said that "pressure is increasing
every month" from the new Member States. De Brouwer reported
that during an internal EU meeting of the SCIFA (Strategic
Committee on Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum) group on
9/15, new members voiced firm opposition to the Commission's
proposal on visa reciprocity which would take the teeth out
of the Schengen agreement's "solidarity mechanism." He said
Poland, Hungary and the Baltic states made it clear they
would not agree to changes which would eliminate the
possibility of automatic imposition of visas on countries
like the U.S. that do not treat citizens of all Schengen
states equally. Responding to a Commission suggestion that
they "use it or lose it," the aggrieved states of Eastern
Europe also made it clear they are not prepared to invoke the
retaliatory mechanism for the time being. (Note. Meanwhile,
the EU scored a small victory with New Zealand's decision to
extend visa waiver equally to all Member States as of April
1, 2005 -- meaning Poland, Slovakia, Cyprus, and the Baltic
states will no longer require visas after that date. End
Note.)


9. (SBU) De Brouwer said that the Commission strongly
supports the idea of the U.S. meeting as a group with the
Member States not on VWP to review the technical criteria of
the program (and, by doing so, send a political message that
there is a certain path towards visa free status). He also
mentioned the political significance of the U.S. meeting
these countries as a group, instead of bilaterally. De
Brouwer asked whether Secretary Ridge would make such an
offer at his upcoming visit in The Hague, as he had heard
from an anonymous source.


10. (U) In the same vein, he urged the U.S. to consider the
Commission's counter-proposal to the U.S. idea of creating a
working group at the expert level to discuss visa issues
(reftel B). Instead of just looking at technical issues
related to information sharing, he said this group could also
discuss VWP and other areas of interest to the EU. PRMOff
explained that VWP was more appropriate to senior level
consultations which are already occurring on a regular basis.


--------------
Poland: Bilateral Agreement Resented
--------------


11. (C) De Brouwer also raised Poland's bilateral agreement
with DHS/CBP for an "Immigration Advisory Program" at the
Warsaw airport. He reported that the Czechs were furious at
this perceived advantage given by the U.S. to Poland (which
they felt would somehow enable Poland to qualify more quickly
for VWP). The Czechs reportedly also complained about
Poland's lack of solidarity by agreeing to such a deal. De
Brouwer said the Commission finds itself in a "rather
ambiguous" situation and inquired whether the U.S. would be
seeking out more countries for bilateral agreements. PRMOff
reviewed the context which led to the bilateral agreement
with Poland, describing it as a re-packaging of existing
programs around the world (i.e., immigration liaison
officers) to help local officials identify fraud and other
problems before boarding. When asked about pre-clearance in
Ireland, de Brouwer noted that Ireland was outside the
Schengen area and thus could do as it pleased. He also said
that the Netherlands might be considered in breach of the
Schengen agreement for programs at Schiphol airport, but
noted there was no written agreement and that the activities
there could be considered experimental or a pilot project.

--------------
Comment
--------------


12. (C) The mild reaction on 9/16 regarding enhanced FBI
access may not fully represent the Commission's feelings once
the news circulates and more information becomes available to
European interlocutors. De Brouwer was evidently more
concerned with the internal deliberations of the SCIFA group
and the pressures of the day (visa reciprocity, treatment of
EU travelers at U.S. borders, etc.). Even de Brouwer's
interest in our management of land borders represents a
pressing problem in Europe: how to deal with communities
that have thrived on cross border movements (i.e., between
Poland and Ukraine, Slovenia and Croatia, etc.). Shortly
after the meeting, USEU was contacted by a reporter asking
about enhanced FBI access; although the reporter would not
name her source, she mentioned it was a European official.
In short, the Commission may take its concerns about
tightened border procedures in the U.S. to the court of
public opinion. Enhanced access to US VISIT will also
certainly be raised during the visits of Secretaries Ridge
and Ashcroft to The Netherlands.

MCKINLEY